Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 28, Issue 2, pp 157–166 | Cite as

Evaluation of maturation competence of metaphase II oocytes in mice based on the distance between pericentriolar materials of meiotic spindle

Distance of PCM during oocyte maturation
  • Chizuka SakaiEmail author
  • Yumi Hoshino
  • Yusuke Sato
  • Eimei Sato
Gamete Biology

Abstract

Purpose

To ascertain whether metaphase II (MII) spindle shape influences oocyte competence, we examined the meiotic spindle organization in in vivo ovulated (IVO) oocytes and in spontaneously matured or follicle stimulating hormone (FSH)-induced oocytes.

Methods

FSH-induced oocytes matured in Waymouth’s MB752/1 or human tubal fluid (HTF) media and oocytes matured spontaneously in the basal medium were obtained, and spindles were detected by immunofluorescence. To evaluate the fertilization-associated differences in spindle morphology, we performed in vitro fertilization and analysed integrin mRNA expression.

Results

The distance between the pericentriolar materials (PCMs) in oocytes matured under all conditions was initially more, but it reduced gradually and increased again thereafter. Therefore, oocytes exhibiting a reduction in the distance between PCMs had the highest development rate to blastocyst in each condition.

Conclusion

These results indicate that the ‘maturation competence’ of MII oocytes can be evaluated on the basis of the distance between PCMs.

Keywords

In vitro maturation Maturation competence Meiotic spindle Mouse oocyte Pericentriolar materials 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Grant to E. Sato (No. 21248032). This work was also supported in part by Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (B) to Y. Hoshino (No. 21780250) from the Ministry of Education, Science, and Culture, Japan.

References

  1. 1.
    Pincus G, Enzmann V. The comparative behavior of mammalian eggs in vivo and in vitro. J Exp Med. 1935;62:655–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Downs SM, Daniel SA, Eppig JJ. Induction of maturation in cumulus cell-enclosed mouse oocytes by follicle-stimulating hormone and epidermal growth factor: evidence for a positive stimulus of somatic cell origin. J Exp Zool. 1988;245:86–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fan HY, Sun QY. Involvement of mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade during oocyte maturation and fertilization in mammals. Biol Reprod. 2004;70:535–47.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Su YQ, Wigglesworth K, Pendola FL, O’Brien MJ, Eppig JJ. Mitogen-activated protein kinase activity in cumulus cells is essential for gonadotropin-induced oocyte meiotic resumption and cumulus expansion in the mouse. Endocrinology. 2002;143:2221–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dekel N, Galiani D, Sherizly I. Dissociation between the inhibitory and the stimulatory action of cAMP on maturation of rat oocytes. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 1988;56:115–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Horner K, Livera G, Hinckley M, Trinh K, Storm D, Conti M. Rodent oocytes express an active adenylyl cyclase required for meiotic arrest. Dev Biol. 2003;258:385–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Albertini DF, Sanfins A, Combelles CM. Origins and manifestations of oocyte maturation competencies. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;6:410–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wassarman PM, Jovine L, Qi H, Williams Z, Darie C, Litscher ES. Recent aspects of mammalian fertilization research. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2005;234:95–103.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Eppig JJ, O’Brien MJ. Comparison of preimplantation developmental competence after mouse oocyte growth and development in vitro and in vivo. Theriogenology. 1998;49:415–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mermillod P, Oussaid B, Cognie Y. Aspects of follicular and oocyte maturation that affect the developmental potential of embryos. J Reprod Fertil Suppl. 1999;54:449–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moor R, Dai Y. Maturation of pig oocytes in vivo and in vitro. Reprod Suppl. 2001;58:91–104.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Trounson A, Anderiesz C, Jones G. Maturation of human oocytes in vitro and their developmental competence. Reproduction. 2001;121:51–75.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edwards RG. Maturation in vitro of mouse, sheep, cow, pig, rhesus monkey and human ovarian oocytes. Nature. 1965;208:349–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sutton ML, Gilchrist RB, Thompson JG. Effects of in-vivo and in-vitro environments on the metabolism of the cumulus-oocyte complex and its influence on oocyte developmental capacity. Hum Reprod Update. 2003;9:35–48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Telfer EE. In vitro models for oocyte development. Theriogenology. 1998;49:451–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Barnes F, Endebrock M, Looney C, Powell R, Westhusin M, Bondioli K. Embryo cloning in cattle: the use of in vitro matured oocytes. J Reprod Fertil. 1993;97:317–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bousquet D, Twagiramungu H, Morin N, Brisson C, Carboneau G, Durocher J. In vitro embryo production in the cow: an effective alternative to the conventional embryo production approach. Theriogenology. 1999;51:59–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    De Rycke M, Liebaers I, Van Steirteghem A. Epigenetic risks related to assisted reproductive technologies: risk analysis and epigenetic inheritance. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:2487–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Albertini DF, Barrett SL. The developmental origins of mammalian oocyte polarity. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2004;15:599–606.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sanfins A, Lee GY, Plancha CE, Overstrom EW, Albertini DF. Distinctions in meiotic spindle structure and assembly during in vitro and in vivo maturation of mouse oocytes. Biol Reprod. 2003;69:2059–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Combelles CM, Carabatsos MJ, London SN, Mailhes JB, Albertini DF. Centrosome-specific perturbations during in vitro maturation of mouse oocytes exposed to cocaine. Exp Cell Res. 2000;260:116–26.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hoshino Y, Sato E. Protein kinase B (PKB/Akt) is required for the completion of meiosis in mouse oocytes. Dev Biol. 2008;314:215–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sutherland AE, Calarco PG, Damsky CH. Developmental regulation of integrin expression at the time of implantation in the mouse embryo. Development. 1993;119:1175–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Almeida EA, Huovila AP, Sutherland AE, Stephens LE, Calarco PG, Shaw LM, et al. Mouse egg integrin alpha 6 beta 1 functions as a sperm receptor. Cell. 1995;81:1095–104.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang Q, Sun QY. Evaluation of oocyte quality: morphological, cellular and molecular predictors. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2007;19:1–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wang WH, Meng L, Hackett RJ, Odenbourg R, Keefe DL. The spindle observation and its relationship with fertilization after intracytoplasmic sperm injection in living human oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2001;75:348–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Coticchio G, Sereni E, Serrao L, Mazzone S, Iadarola I, Borini A. What criteria for the definition of oocyte quality? Ann NY Acad Sci. 2004;1034:132–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Choi T, Fukasawa K, Zhou R, Tessarollo L, Borror K, Resau J, et al. The Mos/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway regulates the size and degradation of the first polar body in maturing mouse oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:7032–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Choi T, Rulong S, Resau J, Fukasawa K, Matten W, Kuriyama R, et al. Mos/mitogen-activated protein kinase can induce early meiotic phenotypes in the absence of maturation-promoting factor: a novel system for analyzing spindle formation during meiosis I. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1996;93:4730–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Barrett SL, Albertini DF. Allocation of gamma-tubulin between oocyte cortex and meiotic spindle influences asymmetric cytokinesis in the mouse oocyte. Biol Reprod. 2007;76:949–57.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ibanez E, Sanfins A, Combelles CM, Overstrom EW, Albertini DF. Genetic strain variations in the metaphase-II phenotype of mouse oocytes matured in vivo or in vitro. Reproduction. 2005;130:845–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Schatten H, Sun QY. The functional significance of centrosomes in mammalian meiosis, fertilization, development, nuclear transfer, and stem cell differentiation. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2009;50:620–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Gueth-Hallonet C, Antony C, Aghion J, Santa-Maria A, Lajoie-Mazenc I, Wright M, et al. Gamma-Tubulin is present in acentriolar MTOCs during early mouse development. J Cell Sci. 1993;105(Pt 1):157–66.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Palacios MJ, Joshi HC, Simerly C, Schatten G. Gamma-tubulin reorganization during mouse fertilization and early development. J Cell Sci. 1993;104(Pt 2):383–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Carabatsos MJ, Combelles CM, Messinger SM, Albertini DF. Sorting and reorganization of centrosomes during oocyte maturation in the mouse. Microsc Res Tech. 2000;49:435–44.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kim NH, Funahashi H, Prather RS, Schatten G, Day BN. Microtubule and microfilament dynamics in porcine oocytes during meiotic maturation. Mol Reprod Dev. 1996;43:248–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Le Guen P, Crozet N. Microtubule and centrosome distribution during sheep fertilization. Eur J Cell Biol. 1989;48:239–49.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Long CR, Pinto-Correia C, Duby RT, Ponce de Leon FA, Boland MP, Roche JF, et al. Chromatin and microtubule morphology during the first cell cycle in bovine zygotes. Mol Reprod Dev. 1993;36:23–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Calarco PG. Centrosome precursors in the acentriolar mouse oocyte. Microsc Res Tech. 2000;49:428–34.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Combelles CM, Albertini DF. Microtubule patterning during meiotic maturation in mouse oocytes is determined by cell cycle-specific sorting and redistribution of gamma-tubulin. Dev Biol. 2001;239:281–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Messinger SM, Albertini DF. Centrosome and microtubule dynamics during meiotic progression in the mouse oocyte. J Cell Sci. 1991;100(Pt 2):289–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Van Blerkom J. Microtubule mediation of cytoplasmic and nuclear maturation during the early stages of resumed meiosis in cultured mouse oocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1991;88:5031–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Sanfins A, Plancha CE, Overstrom EW, Albertini DF. Meiotic spindle morphogenesis in in vivo and in vitro matured mouse oocytes: insights into the relationship between nuclear and cytoplasmic quality. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2889–99.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Plancha CE, Sanfins A, Rodrigues P, Albertini D. Cell polarity during folliculogenesis and oogenesis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:478–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Maro B, Howlett SK, Webb M. Non-spindle microtubule organizing centers in metaphase II-arrested mouse oocytes. J Cell Biol. 1985;101:1665–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Schatten H, Schatten G, Mazia D, Balczon R, Simerly C. Behavior of centrosomes during fertilization and cell division in mouse oocytes and in sea urchin eggs. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:105–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Schuh M, Ellenberg J. Self-organization of MTOCs replaces centrosome function during acentrosomal spindle assembly in live mouse oocytes. Cell. 2007;130:484–98.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Miao YL, Kikuchi K, Sun QY, Schatten H. Oocyte aging: cellular and molecular changes, developmental potential and reversal possibility. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15:573–85.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Miao YL, Sun QY, Zhang X, Zhao JG, Zhao MT, Spate L, et al. Centrosome abnormalities during porcine oocyte aging. Environ Mol Mutagen. 2009;50:666–71.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Sun QY, Schatten H. Regulation of dynamic events by microfilaments during oocyte maturation and fertilization. Reproduction. 2006;131:193–205.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Wang WH, Meng L, Hackett RJ, Keefe DL. Developmental ability of human oocytes with or without birefringent spindles imaged by Polscope before insemination. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1464–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Coticchio G, Sciajno R, Hutt K, Bromfield J, Borini A, Albertini DF. Comparative analysis of the metaphase II spindle of human oocytes through polarized light and high-performance confocal microscopy. Fertil Steril. 2010;93:2056–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chizuka Sakai
    • 1
    Email author
  • Yumi Hoshino
    • 1
  • Yusuke Sato
    • 1
  • Eimei Sato
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Animal Reproduction, Graduate School of Agricultural ScienceTohoku UniversitySendaiJapan

Personalised recommendations