Abstract
Introduction
The purpose of this retrospective analysis is to compare the efficiency of hCG-induced natural and Clomiphene citrate (CC) cycles in normovulatory patients undergoing frozen embryo transfer (FET).
Materials and methods
It was retrospectively conducted in the Dutchspeaking Free University of Brussels and covered the period from April 2003 to August 2006. In particular, 428 day-three FET cycles belonging to the two comparative groups were recruited. Of these FET cycles, 261 were hCG-induced natural and 167 clomiphene citrate-induced cycles.
Results
No statistically significant difference was observed in live birth rate between CC and natural group (22.2% versus 22.6%), respectively (P = 0.708). Except for the number of embryos transferred (1.72 ± 0.46 for CC group versus 1.63 ± 0.48 for natural group, P = 0.045), no other parameters seem to influence the outcome.
Discussion
To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to investigate which of the above mentioned regimens is optimal for normo-ovulatory women in FET cycles. A similar delivery outcome was observed for hCG–induced natural and CC-induced cycles used for endometrial preparation in FET.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Trounson A, Mohr L. Human Pregnancy following cryopreservation, thawing and transfer of an eight-cell embryo. Nature. 1983;305:707–9.
Cohen J, Simons RF, Edwards RG, Fehilly CB, Fishel SB. Pregnancies following the frozen storage of expanding human blastocysts. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1985;2:59–64.
Tiitinen A, Halttunen M, Harkki P, Vuoristo P, Hyden-Granskog C. Elective single embryo transfer: the value of cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:1140–4.
Sutcliffe AG, D’Souza SW, Cadman J, Richards B, McKinlay IA, Lieberman B. Minor congenital anomalies, mayor congenital malformations and development in children conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:3332–7.
Wada I, Macnamee MC, Wick K, Bradfield JM, Brinsden PR. Birth characteristics and perinatal outcome of babies conceived from cryopreserved embryos. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:543–6.
Mandelbaum J. Embryo and oocyte cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:43–7.
Lieberman BA, Trouo SA, Matson PL. Cryopreservation of embryos and pregnancy rates after IVF (Letter). Lancet. 1992;340:116.
Horne G, Critchlow JD, Neuman MC, Edozien L, Matson PL, Lieberman BA. A prospective evaluation of cryopreservation strategies in a two-embryo transfer program. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:117–9.
Nardo LG, Nikas G, Makrigiannakis A. Molecules in blastocyst implantation. Role of matrix metalloproteinases, cytokines and growth factors. J Reprod Med. 2003;48:137–47.
Ghobara T, Vandekerckhove P. Cycle regimens for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (Review). The Cochrane Library. 2008;Issue 2.
Morozov V, Ruman J, Kenigsberg D, Moodie G, Brenner S. Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Gen. 2007;24:119–23.
Gelbaya T, Nardo L, Hunter H, Fitzgerald CT, Horne G, Pease EE, et al. Cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer in natural cycle or down-regulated hormonally controlled cycles: a retrospective study. Fertil Steril. 2006;85:603–9.
al-Shawaf T, Yang D, al-Magud Y, Seaton A, Iketubosin F, Craft I. Ultrasonic monitoring during replacement of frozen/thawed embryos in natural and hormone replacement cycles. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:2068–74.
Thibault C, Levasseur MC. Ovulation. Hum Reprod. 1988;3:513–23.
Weissman A, Levin D, Ravhon A, Eran H, Golan A, Levran D. What is the preferred method for timing natural cycle frozen-thawed embryo transfer? Reprod Bio Med Online. 2009;19:66–7.
Dickey RP, Olar TT, Curole DN, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproduction technologies. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:418–21.
Geier A, Lunenfeld B, Pariente C, Kotev-Emeth S, Shadmi A, Kokia E, et al. Estrogen receptor binding material in blood of patients after clomiphene citrate administration: detection by a radioreceptor assay. Fertil Steril. 1987;47:778–84.
Zayed F, Lenton EA, Cooke ID. Natural cycle in-vitro fertilization in couples with unexplained infertility: impact of various factors on outcome. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:2402–7.
Kosmas IP, Janssens R, De Munck L, Al Turki H, Van der Elst J, Tournaye H, et al. Ultrasound-guided embryo transfer does not offer any benefit in clinical outcome: a randomized controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1327–34.
Van Landuyt L, De Vos A, Joris H, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem A. Blastocyst formation in in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: influence of the fertilization procedure. Fertil Steril. 2005;83:1397–403.
Van Den Abbeel E, Van Steirteghem A. Zona pellucida damage to human embryos after cryopreservation and the consequences for their blastomere survival and in-vitro viability. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:373–8.
Gordts S, Campo R, Puttemans P, Brosens I, Valkenburg M, Norre J, et al. Belgian legislation and the effect of elective single embryo transfer on IVF outcome. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;10:436–41.
Saldeen P, Sundstrom P. Would legislation imposing single embryo transfer be a feasible way to reduce the rate of multiple pregnancies after IVF treatment? Hum Reprod. 2005;20:4–8.
Van Voorhis BJ, Syrop CH, Allen BD, Sparks AE, Stovall DW. The efficacy and cost effectiveness of embryo cryopreservation compared with other assisted reproductive techniques. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:647–50.
Katsoff B, Check JH, Choe JK, Wilson C. A novel method to evaluate pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization to enable to better understanding of the true efficacy of the procedure. Cl and Exp Obst and Gyn. 2005;32:213–6.
Mandelbaum J, Junca A, Placchot M, Alnot MO, Alvarez S, Debache C, et al. Human embryo cryopreservation, extrinisic and intrinisic parameters of success. Hum Reprod. 1987;2:709–14.
Loh SKE, Ganesan G, Leong N. Clomid versus hormone endometrial preparation in FET cycles. Abstract book of the 17th World Congress on Fertility Sterility (IFFS) 2001;3.
Van Der Auwera I, Meuleman C, Koninckx P. Human menopausal gonadotrophin increases pregnancy rate in comparison with clomiphene citrate during replacement cycles of frozen/thawed pronucleate ova. Hum Reprod. 1994;9:1556–60.
Gonen Y, Casper RF. Sonographic determination of a possible adverse effect of clomiphene citrate on endometrial growth. Hum Reprod. 1990;5:670–4.
Rogers PAW, Polson D, Murphy CR, Hosie M, Susil B, Leoni M, et al. Correlation of endometrial histology, morphology, and ultrasound appearance after different stimulation protocols for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1991;55:583–7.
Licht P, Fluhr H, Neuwinger J, Wallwiener D, Wildt L. Is human chorionic gonadotropin directly involved in the regulation of human implantation? Review. Mol Cel Endocrin. 2007;15:85–92.
Queenan JT, Ramey JW, Seltman HJ, Eure L, Veeck LL, Muasher SJ. Transfer of cryopreserved-thawed embryos in a natural cycle or a programme cycle with exogenous hormonal replacement yields similar pregnancy results. Fertil Steril. 1994;62:545–50.
Karlstrom PO, Bergh T, Forsberg AS, Sandkvist U, Wikland M. Prognostic factors for the success rate of embryo freezing. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1263–6.
Wang JX, Yap YY, Matthews CD. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: influence of clinical factors on implantation rate and risk of multiple conception. Hum Reprod. 2001;16:2316–9.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Capsule Similar delivery outcome between hCG–induced natural and CC-induced cycles used for endometrial preparation in normo-ovulatory women in FET.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kyrou, D., Fatemi, H.M., Blockeel, C. et al. Transfer of cryopreserved - thawed embryos in hCG induced natural or clomiphene citrate cycles yields similar live birth rates in normo-ovulatory women. J Assist Reprod Genet 27, 683–689 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9464-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-010-9464-x