Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 27, Issue 8, pp 509–515 | Cite as

Slow and ultrarapid cryopreservation of biopsied mouse blastocysts and its effect on DNA integrity index

  • Amr Kader
  • Tommaso Falcone
  • Rakesh K. Sharma
  • Devna Mangrola
  • Ashok AgarwalEmail author
Fertility Preservation

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the effect of slow and ultra-rapid freezing on biopsied blastocysts’ DNA integrity.

Methods

Forty eight mouse blastocysts were biopsied of which 16 were cryopreserved by slowly freezing and 17 by vitrification. Fourteen intact blastocysts were slowly cryopreserved and 24 were vitrified. Eighteen fresh intact blastocysts and fifteen biopsied blastocysts served as controls. The DNA integrity index of all blastocysts was evaluated using (TUNEL) staining and confocal imaging

Results

Both slow freezing and vitrification of biopsied blastocysts induced apoptosis to a similar extent. Biopsying blastocysts before vitrification resulted in less apoptosis than vitrification of intact blastocysts.

Conclusion

Slow freezing and vitrification are equal options for preservation of biopsied blastocysts as regards the DNA integrity index (DII). Biopsied blastocysts better tolerate vitrification than intact expanded blastocysts.

Keywords

Blastocyst Vitrification Cryopreservation Media protocol TUNEL Apoptotic index DNA integrity index (DII) 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to acknowledge Dr Hussein Abdelrazik for his assistance in the biopsy procedures.

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson RA, Pickering S. The current status of preimplantation genetic screening: British fertility society policy and practice guidelines. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2008;11:71–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Harper J, Sermon K, Geraedts J, Vesela K, Harton G, Thornhill A, et al. What next for preimplantation genetic screening? Hum Reprod. 2008;23:478–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Twisk M, Mastenbroek S, van Wely M, Heineman MJ, Van der Veen F, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening for abnormal number of chromosomes (aneuploidies) in in vitro fertilisation or intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;CD005291.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    De Vos A, Van Steirteghem A. Aspects of biopsy procedures prior to preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat Diagn. 2001;21:767–80.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gardner DK. Textbook of assisted reproductive techniques: laboratory and clinical perspectives. 3rd ed. London: Informa Healthcare; 2009.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ogilvie CM, Braude PR, Scriven PN. Preimplantation genetic diagnosis—an overview. J Histochem Cytochem. 2005;53:255–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Tarin JJ, Conaghan J, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Human embryo biopsy on the 2nd day after insemination for preimplantation diagnosis: removal of a quarter of embryo retards cleavage. Fertil Steril. 1992;58:970–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Liu J, Van den Abbeel E, Van Steirteghem A. The in-vitro and in-vivo developmental potential of frozen and non-frozen biopsied 8-cell mouse embryos. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1481–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    McArthur SJ, Leigh D, Marshall JT, Gee AJ, De Boer KA, Jansen RP. Blastocyst trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic diagnosis for familial monogenic disorders and chromosomal translocations. Prenat Diagn. 2008;28:434–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kokkali G, Traeger-Synodinos J, Vrettou C, Stavrou D, Jones GM, Cram DS, et al. Blastocyst biopsy versus cleavage stage biopsy and blastocyst transfer for preimplantation genetic diagnosis of beta-thalassaemia: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:1443–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    de Boer KA, Catt JW, Jansen RP, Leigh D, McArthur S. Moving to blastocyst biopsy for preimplantation genetic diagnosis and single embryo transfer at Sydney IVF. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:295–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fernandez-Gonzalez R, Moreira PN, Perez-Crespo M, Sanchez-Martin M, Ramirez MA, Pericuesta E, et al. Long-term effects of mouse intracytoplasmic sperm injection with DNA-fragmented sperm on health and behavior of adult offspring. Biol Reprod. 2008;78:761–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Moley KH. Oocyte and preimplantation embryo perturbations: long-term effects on offspring. Preface. Semin Reprod Med. 2008;26:141–2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Park ES, Hwang WS, Kang SK, Lee BC, Han JY, Lim JM. Improved embryo development with decreased apoptosis in blastomeres after the treatment of cloned bovine embryos with beta-mercaptoethanol and hemoglobin. Mol Reprod Dev. 2004;67:200–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pomar FJ, Teerds KJ, Kidson A, Colenbrander B, Tharasanit T, Aguilar B, et al. Differences in the incidence of apoptosis between in vivo and in vitro produced blastocysts of farm animal species: a comparative study. Theriogenology. 2005;63:2254–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Joris H, Van den Abbeel E, Vos AD, Van Steirteghem A. Reduced survival after human embryo biopsy and subsequent cryopreservation. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:2833–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Edgar DH, Archer J, Gook DA, Jericho H, Wilton L, Bourne H. Survival and developmental potential of stored human early cleavage stage embryos. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004;115 Suppl 1:S8–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Zheng WT, Zhuang GL, Zhou CQ, Fang C, Ou JP, Li T, et al. Comparison of the survival of human biopsied embryos after cryopreservation with four different methods using non-transferable embryos. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:1615–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Parriego M, Sole M, Aurell R, Barri PN, Veiga A. Birth after transfer of frozen-thawed vitrified biopsied blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2007;24:147–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Magli MC, Gianaroli L, Grieco N, Cefalu E, Ruvolo G, Ferraretti AP. Cryopreservation of biopsied embryos at the blastocyst stage. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:2656–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tominaga K, Iwaki F, Hochi S. Conventional freezing of in vitro-produced and biopsied bovine blastocysts in the presence of a low concentration of glycerol and sucrose. J Reprod Dev. 2007;53:443–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    McArthur SJ, Leigh D, Marshall JT, de Boer KA, Jansen RP. Pregnancies and live births after trophectoderm biopsy and preimplantation genetic testing of human blastocysts. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:1628–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kader A, Agarwal A, Abdelrazik H, Sharma RK, Ahmady A, Falcone T. Evaluation of post-thaw DNA integrity of mouse blastocysts after ultrarapid and slow freezing. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:2087–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zech NH, Lejeune B, Zech H, Vanderzwalmen P. Vitrification of hatching and hatched human blastocysts: effect of an opening in the zona pellucida before vitrification. Reprod Biomed Online. 2005;11:355–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kader A, Sharma RK, Falcone T, Agarwal A. Mouse blastocyst previtrification interventions and DNA integrity. Fertil Steril. 2009.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jansen RP, Bowman MC, de Boer KA, Leigh DA, Lieberman DB, McArthur SJ. What next for preimplantation genetic screening (PGS)? Experience with blastocyst biopsy and testing for aneuploidy. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1476–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Jones GM, Cram DS, Song B, Kokkali G, Pantos K, Trounson AO. Novel strategy with potential to identify developmentally competent IVF blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:1748–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Vanderzwalmen P, Bertin G, Debauche C, Standaert V, van Roosendaal E, Vandervorst M, et al. Births after vitrification at morula and blastocyst stages: effect of artificial reduction of the blastocoelic cavity before vitrification. Hum Reprod. 2002;17:744–51.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mukaida T, Oka C, Goto T, Takahashi K. Artificial shrinkage of blastocoeles using either a micro-needle or a laser pulse prior to the cooling steps of vitrification improves survival rate and pregnancy outcome of vitrified human blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2006;21:3246–52.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hiraoka K, Kinutani M, Kinutani K. Blastocoele collapse by micropipetting prior to vitrification gives excellent survival and pregnancy outcomes for human day 5 and 6 expanded blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2884–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amr Kader
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
  • Tommaso Falcone
    • 1
  • Rakesh K. Sharma
    • 1
  • Devna Mangrola
    • 1
  • Ashok Agarwal
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Center For Reproductive Medicine, Glickman Urological & Kidney Institute and Obstetrics and Gynecology and Women’s Health InstituteCleveland ClinicClevelandUSA
  2. 2.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyWest Virginia UniversityMorgantownUSA
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyAlexandria UniversityAlexandriaEgypt

Personalised recommendations