Advertisement

Reproduction beyond menopause: how old is too old for assisted reproductive technology?

  • David Banh
  • Dara L. Havemann
  • John Y. Phelps
Assisted Reproduction

Abstract

Background

Due to the recent media attention on postmenopausal women giving birth, there has been an increased scrutiny on the utility and safety of assisted reproductive technology in postmenopausal women.

Objective

The purpose of this commentary is to discuss the following: 1) the limitations and complications of ART in women of advanced reproductive age; 2) the balance between the welfare of the mother and that of the child; 3) the double standards of advanced reproductive age; and 4) the importance of financial and social support systems and preconception counseling with advanced reproductive age.

Conclusion

When providing in-vitro fertilization services to women of advanced reproductive age, special considerations must be given to ensure the welfare of mother and the child and that the principles of beneficence and nonmaleficence are guaranteed.

Keywords

Ethics In-vitro fertilization Postmenopausal reproduction Child welfare 

References

  1. 1.
    Jones B. Oldest woman to give birth dies, leaving twins. USA Today. July 15, 2009. Available at http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2009-07-15-spain-oldest-woman-birth_N.htm. Accessed September 27, 2009.
  2. 2.
    Woman in India ‘has twins at 70’. BBC News. July 5, 2008. Available at http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/2/hi/south_asia/7491782.stm. Accessed September 27, 2009.
  3. 3.
    Check JH, Nowroozi K, Barnea ER, Shaw KJ, Sauer MV. Successful delivery after age 50: a report of two cases as a result of oocyte donation. Obstet Gynecol. 1993;81:835–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Antinori S, Versaci C, Gholami GH, Panci C, Caffa B. Oocyte donation in menopausal women. Hum Reprod. 1993;8:1487.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Pregnancy after age 50: application of oocyte donation to women after natural menopause. Lancet. 1993;341:321–3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Sauer MV, Paulson RJ, Lobo RA. Pregnancy in women 50 or more years of age: outcomes of 22 consecutively established pregnancies from oocyte donation. Fertil Steril. 1995;64:111–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Daar JF. Reproductive technologies and the law. Newark: LexisNexis/Matthew Bender; 2005.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Faddy MJ, Gosden RG, Gougeon A, Richardson SJ, Nelson JF. Accelerated disappearance of ovarian follicles in mid-life: implications for forecasting menopause. Hum Reprod. 1992;7:1342–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arias E. United States life tables, 2004. National vital statistics reports. Hyattsville: National Center for Health Statistics; 2007.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    World Health Organization. The global burden of disease: 2004 update. Geneva: WHO; 2008.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Roy A. Specificity of risk factors for depression. Am J Psychiatry. 1981;138:959–61.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Melhem NM, Walker M, Moritz G, Brent DA. Antecedents and sequelae of sudden parental death in offspring and surviving caregivers. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2008;162:403–10.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Salihu HM, Shumpert MN, Slay M, Kirby RS, Alexander GR. Childbearing beyond maternal age 50 and fetal outcomes in the United States. Obstet Gynecol. 2003;102:1006–14.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nabukera S, Wingate MS, Alexander GR, Salihu HM. First-time births among women 30 years and older in the United States: patterns and risk of adverse outcomes. J Reprod Med. 2006;51:676–82.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority. Code of practice. 8th ed. London: Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority; 2009.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    American Medical Association. Principles of Medical Ethics. American Medical Association; 2001. Available at http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/physician-resources/medical-ethics/code-medical-ethics/principles-medical-ethics.shtml. Accessed April 1, 2010.
  17. 17.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. The burden of chronic diseases and their risk factors: national and state perspectives 2002. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; 2002.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Mental health: a report of the surgeon general—executive summary. Rockville: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, Center for Mental Health Services, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Mental Health; 1999.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Unverzagt FW, Gao S, Baiyewu O, Ogunniyi AO, Gureje O, Perkins A, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment. Neurology. 2001;57:1655–62.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Naylor Jr DF, Olson MM. Critical care obstetrics and gynecology. Crit Care Clin. 2003;19:127–49.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Banh
    • 1
  • Dara L. Havemann
    • 1
  • John Y. Phelps
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics & GynecologyThe University of Texas Medical BranchGalvestonUSA

Personalised recommendations