Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 26, Issue 8, pp 433–436 | Cite as

Blastocyst transfer and gender: IVF versus ICSI

  • Martha Agnes HentemannEmail author
  • Siri Briskemyr
  • Kjell Bertheussen



To investigate the difference in sex ratio in our centre after day 5 embryo transfer among neonates delivered after fresh in vitro fertilization (IVF), fresh intra cytoplasmatic sperminjection (ICSI) and frozen embryo replacement (FER) compared to expected sex ratio in normal population.


Retrospective data after IVF/ICSI/FER therapy from 1995 – 2007 and data from the literature on similar subjects.


Among a total of 420 births after day 5 transfer, there were 225 male and 195 female babies. However, after ICSI alone 30 were female and 21 male. Adding all available data from the literature on gender ratio after long term culture, the ratio of male births to total births (0.545) was significantly (p = 0.004) different from the expected ratio (0.515)


It appears that significantly more males are born than expected after day 5 transfer in IVF. However, a subgroup analysis in our data comparing IVF, ICSI and FER revealed more females born after ICSI and FER, suggesting that further research is needed in this area.


Blastocyst culture IVF/ICSI Sequential culture media Sex ratio 


Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest for any of the submitting authors in reference to the submitted material.


  1. 1.
    Agung B, Otoi T, Wongsrikeao P, et al. Effect of maturation culture period of oocytes on the sex ratio of in vitro fertilized bovine embryos. J Reprod Dev. 2006;52:123–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Alfarawati S, Fragouli E, Katz-Jaffe M, Schoolcraft WB, Munne S, Wells D. Comprehensive cytogenetic analysis of the blastocyst stage: the impact of aneuploidy on embryonic mophology. Human Reproduction, Abstracts of the 25 th Annual Meeting of ESHRE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 28 June - 1 July, 2009;24 supplement 1:i46–7.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson M, Graham J, Tucker M, Krecko T, Levy M, Widra E. Comparison of gender and birth weight following day three and blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(Supplement 1):S179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bermejo-Alvarez P, Rizos D, Rath D, Lonergan P, Gutierrez-Adan A. Can bovine in vitro-matured oocytes selectively process X- or Y-sorted sperm differentially? Biol Reprod. 2008;79:594–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bermejo-Alvarez P, Rizos D, Rath D, Lonergan P, Gutierrez-Adan A. Epigenetic differences between male and female bovine blastocysts produced in vitro. Physiol Genomics. 2008;32:264–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bertheussen K. Growth of cells in a new defined protein-free medium. Cytotechnology. 1993;11:219–31.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bertheussen K, Forsdahl F, Maltau JM. In vitro fertilization. New media for embryo culture to the blastocyst stage. Proceedings of the 10th World Congress of in Vitro Fertilization and Assisted Reproduction, Vancouver (Canada), May 24–28: 1997;199–204.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chang HJ, Lee JR, Jee BC, Suh CS, Kim SH. Impact of blastocyst transfer on offspring sex ratio and the monozygotic twinning rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2008.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Csokmay JM, Hill MJ, Cioppettini FV, Miller KA, Scott RT, Jr., Frattarelli JL. Live birth sex ratios are not influenced by blastocyst-stage embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2008.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dumoulin JC, Derhaag JG, Bras M, et al. Growth rate of human preimplantation embryos is sex dependent after ICSI but not after IVF. Hum Reprod. 2005;20:484–91.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grech V, Savona-Ventura C, Vassallo-Agius P. Research pointers: Unexplained differences in sex ratios at birth in Europe and North America. BMJ. 2002;324:1010–1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gutierrez-Adan A, Granados J, Pintado B, De La FJ. Influence of glucose on the sex ratio of bovine IVM/IVF embryos cultured in vitro. Reprod Fertil Dev. 2001;13:361–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gutierrez-Adan A, Lonergan P, Rizos D, et al. Effect of the in vitro culture system on the kinetics of blastocyst development and sex ratio of bovine embryos. Theriogenology. 2001;55:1117–26.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hentemann M, Bertheussen K. New media for culture to blastocyst. Fertil Steril. 2009;91:878–83.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Holst N, Bertheussen K, Forsdahl F, Hakonsen MB, Hansen LJ, Nielsen HI. Optimization and simplification of culture conditions in human in vitro fertilization (IVF) and preembryo replacement by serum-free media. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1990;7:47–53.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kausche A, Jones GM, Trounson AO, Figueiredo F, MacLachlan V, Lolatgis N. Sex ratio and birth weights of infants born as a result of blastocyst transfers compared with early cleavage stage embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:688–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Luna M, Duke M, Copperman A, Grunfeld L, Sandler B, Barritt J. Blastocyst embryo transfer is associated with a sex-ratio imbalance in favor of male offspring. Fertil Steril. 2007;87:519–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Meintjes M, Crider-Pirkle S, Ward D, Rodriguez J, Chantilis S, Madden J. Sex ratio and birth weight outcome when considering blastocyst expansion, multiple gestation, and facility. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(Supplement 1):S147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Menezo YJ, Chouteau J, Torello J, Girard A, Veiga A. Birth weight and sex ratio after transfer at the blastocyst stage in humans. Fertil Steril. 1999;72:221–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mercader A, Gamiz P, de los Santos M, Remohii J, Pellicer A. Sex ratio after day 2, day 3, or blastocyst transfer and cleavage stage transfer. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(Supplement 1):S261–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Milki AA, Jun SH, Hinckley MD, Westphal LW, Giudice LC, Behr B. Comparison of the sex ratio with blastocyst transfer and cleavage stage transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2003;20:323–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nedambale TL, Dinnyes A, Yang X, Tian XC. Bovine blastocyst development in vitro: timing, sex, and viability following vitrification. Biol Reprod. 2004;71:1671–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:1139–46.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Quintans CJ, Donaldson MJ, Blanco LA, Sergio PR. Deviation in sex ratio after selective transfer of the most developed cocultured blastocysts. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1998;15:403–4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ray PF, Conaghan J, Winston RM, Handyside AH. Increased number of cells and metabolic activity in male human preimplantation embryos following in vitro fertilization. J Reprod Fertil. 1995;104:165–71.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Richter KS, Anderson M, Osborn BH. Selection for faster development does not bias sex ratios resulting from blastocyst embryo transfer. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;12:460–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Rodriguez HF, Bustillo M, La Palme J, Riley E, Eisermann J, Thompson K. Clinical outcomes with transfer of blastocyst or cleavage stage embryos: high order pregnancies, newborn weights and sex ratios. Fertil Steril. 2001;76(Supplement 1):S170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Schwarzler P, Zech H, Auer M, et al. Pregnancy outcome after blastocyst transfer as compared to early cleavage stage embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2004;19:2097–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Tarin JJ, Bernabeu R, Baviera A, Bonada M, Cano A. Sex selection may be inadvertently performed in in-vitro fertilization-embryo transfer programmes. Hum Reprod. 1995;10:2992–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Weston G, Osianlis T, Catt J, and Vollenhoven B. Blastocyst transfer does not cause a sex-ratio imbalance. Fertil Steril. 2008.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Wilson M, Hartke K, Kiehl M, Rodgers J, Brabec C, Lyles R. Integration of blastocyst transfer for all patients. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:693–6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wilson M, Hartke K, Kiehl M, Rodgers J, Brabec C, Lyles R. Transfer of blastocysts and morulae on day 5. Fertil Steril. 2004;82:327–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Zini A, Boman JM, Belzile E, Ciampi A. Sperm DNA damage is associated with an increased risk of pregnancy loss after IVF and ICSI: systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:2663–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Zini A and Sigman M. Are Tests of Sperm DNA Damage Clinically Useful? Pros and Cons. J Androl. 2008.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Martha Agnes Hentemann
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Siri Briskemyr
    • 2
  • Kjell Bertheussen
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, IVF-unit, University Hospital of Northern Norway, and Institute of Clinical MedicineUniversity of TromsøTromsøNorway
  2. 2.University Hospital of Northern NorwayTromsøNorway
  3. 3.IVF-department, University Hospital of Northern NorwayTromsøNorway

Personalised recommendations