Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Achieving high survival rate following cryopreservation after isolation of prepubertal mouse spermatogonial cells

  • ANIMAL EXPERIMENTATION
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Isolating spermatogonia cells with high purity and viability and achieving better survival rate following cryopreservation

Methods

Isolating the cells by Magnetic Activating Cell Sorting (MACS) method using anti CD49f (α6 integrin) antibody and Dynabeads and freezing in DMSO-based freezing mediums containing three different FBS concentrations of 50%, 60% and 70%.

Results

The mean (±SD) purity of the isolated cells was 92.52 ± 3.57 (range 92.43–98.25). The cells frozen in group I, II and III had mean 39.60 ± 1.48 (range 37.98–41.62), 89.05 ± 3.83 (range 80.83–90.33) and 90.52 ± 1.71 (range 89.07–92.52) viability, respectively.

Conclusion

Higher viable cell counts and purity can be attained by the use of α6 integrin and magnetic beads. After the thawing of spermatogonial cells, optimum viability was achieved in freezing media containing 60% FBS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kanatsu-Shinohara M, et al. Long-term proliferation in culture and germline transmission of mouse male germline stems cells. Biol Reprod. 2003;69(2):612–6. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.103.017012.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Griswold MD. The central role of Sertoli cells in spermatogenesis. Semin Cell Dev Biol. 1998;9(4):411–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Geens M, et al. Spermatogonial survival after grafting human testicular tissue to immunodeficient mice. Hum Reprod. 2006;21(2):390–6. doi:10.1093/humrep/dei412.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Agarwal A, et al. Fertility after cancer: a prospective review of assisted reproductive outcome with banked semen specimens. Fertil Steril. 2004;81(2):342–8. doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2003.07.021.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bleyer WA. Epidemiologic impact of children with brain tumors. Childs Nerv Syst. 1999;15(11–12):758–63. doi:10.1007/s003810050467.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Howell S, Shalet S. Gonadal damage from chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1998;27(4):927–43. doi:10.1016/S0889-8529(05)70048-7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meistrich ML. Effects of chemotherapy and radiotherapy on spermatogenesis. Eur Urol. 1993;23(1):136–41. discussion 142.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Aslam I, et al. Fertility preservation of boys undergoing anti-cancer therapy: a review of the existing situation and prospects for the future. Hum Reprod. 2000;15(10):2154–9. doi:10.1093/humrep/15.10.2154.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wallace WH, Thomson AB. Preservation of fertility in children treated for cancer. Arch Dis Child. 2003;88(6):493–6. doi:10.1136/adc.88.6.493.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tournaye H, et al. Preserving the reproductive potential of men and boys with cancer: current concepts and future prospects. Hum Reprod Update. 2004;10(6):525–32. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmh038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brinster RL, Zimmermann JW. Spermatogenesis following male germ-cell transplantation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1994;91(24):11298–302. doi:10.1073/pnas.91.24.11298.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schlatt S, et al. Germ cell transfer into rat, bovine, monkey and human testes. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(1):144–50. doi:10.1093/humrep/14.1.144.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Radford J. Restoration of fertility after treatment for cancer. Horm Res. 2003;59(Suppl 1):21–3. doi:10.1159/000067840.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Radford J, Shalet S, Lieberman B. Fertility after treatment for cancer. Questions remain over ways of preserving ovarian and testicular tissue. BMJ. 1999;319(7215):935–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Tres LL, Kierszenbaum AL. Viability of rat spermatogenic cells in vitro is facilitated by their coculture with Sertoli cells in serum-free hormone-supplemented medium. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1983;80(11):3377–81. doi:10.1073/pnas.80.11.3377.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Nagano M, et al. Culture of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Tissue Cell. 1998;30(4):389–97. doi:10.1016/S0040-8166(98)80053-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Izadyar F, et al. Isolation and purification of type A spermatogonia from the bovine testis. Reproduction. 2002;124(1):85–94. doi:10.1530/rep.0.1240085.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. van Pelt AM, et al. Isolation of the synchronized. A spermatogonia from adult vitamin A-deficient rat testes. Biol Reprod. 1996;55(2):439–44. doi:10.1095/biolreprod55.2.439.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Izadyar F, et al. Proliferation and differentiation of bovine type A spermatogonia during long-term culture. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(1):272–81. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.102.004986.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Shinohara T, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Functional analysis of spermatogonial stem cells in Steel and cryptorchid infertile mouse models. Dev Biol. 2000;220(2):401–11. doi:10.1006/dbio.2000.9655.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Nagano M, et al. Maintenance of mouse male germ line stems cells in vitro. Biol Reprod. 2003;68(6):2207–14. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.102.014050.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Growth factors essential for self-renewal and expansion of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(47):16489–94. doi:10.1073/pnas.0407063101.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kubota H, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Culture conditions and single growth factors affect fate determination of mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Biol Reprod. 2004;71(3):722–31. doi:10.1095/biolreprod.104.029207.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Creemers LB, et al. Maintenance of adult mouse type A spermatogonia in vitro: influence of serum and growth factors and comparison with prepubertal spermatogonial cell culture. Reproduction. 2002;124(6):791–9. doi:10.1530/rep.0.1240791.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Hofmann MC, Braydich-Stolle L, Dym M. Isolation of male germ-line stem cells; influence of GDNF. Dev Biol. 2005;279(1):114–24. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.12.006.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Ryu BY, et al. Phenotypic and functional characteristics of spermatogonial stem cells in rats. Dev Biol. 2004;274(1):158–70. doi:10.1016/j.ydbio.2004.07.004.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Shinohara T, et al. Spermatogonial stem cell enrichment by multiparameter selection of mouse testis cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2000;97(15):8346–51. doi:10.1073/pnas.97.15.8346.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. van der Wee KS, et al. Immunomagnetic isolation and long-term culture of mouse type A spermatogonia. J Androl. 2001;22(4):696–704.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. von Schonfeldt V, et al. Magnetic cell sorting is a fast and effective method of enriching viable spermatogonia from Djungarian hamster, mouse, and marmoset monkey testes. Biol Reprod. 1999;61(3):582–9. doi:10.1095/biolreprod61.3.582.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Aponte PM, et al. Spermatogonial stem cells: characteristics and experimental possibilities. APMIS. 2005;113(11–12):727–42. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0463.2005.apm_302.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Izadyar F, et al. Development of a cryopreservation protocol for type A spermatogonia. J Androl. 2002;23(4):537–45.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Kanatsu-Shinohara M, et al. Restoration of fertility in infertile mice by transplantation of cryopreserved male germline stem cells. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(12):2660–7. doi:10.1093/humrep/deg483.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Shinohara T, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. beta1- and alpha6-integrin are surface markers on mouse spermatogonial stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1999;96(10):5504–9. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.10.5504.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Kanatsu M, Nishikawa SI. In vitro analysis of epiblast tissue potency for hematopoietic cell differentiation. Development. 1996;122(3):823–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Bunge RG, Sherman JK. Fertilizing capacity of frozen human spermatozoa. Nature. 1953;172(4382):767–8. doi:10.1038/172767b0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Fossa SD, Aass N, Molne K. Is routine pre-treatment cryopreservation of semen worthwhile in the management of patients with testicular cancer? Br J Urol. 1989;64(5):524–9. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.1989.tb05292.x.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Royere D, et al. Cryopreservation of spermatozoa: a 1996 review. Hum Reprod Update. 1996;2(6):553–9. doi:10.1093/humupd/2.6.553.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Lass A, Akagbosu F, Brinsden P. Sperm banking and assisted reproduction treatment for couples following cancer treatment of the male partner. Hum Reprod Update. 2001;7(4):370–7. doi:10.1093/humupd/7.4.370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Geens M, et al. The efficiency of magnetic-activated cell sorting and fluorescence-activated cell sorting in the decontamination of testicular cell suspensions in cancer patients. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(3):733–42. doi:10.1093/humrep/del418.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Ehmcke J, Wistuba J, Schlatt S. Spermatogonial stem cells: questions, models and perspectives. Hum Reprod Update. 2006;12(3):275–82. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmk001.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. de Rooij DG, Russell LD. All you wanted to know about spermatogonia but were afraid to ask. J Androl. 2000;21(6):776–98.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bucci LR, et al. Isolation and biochemical studies of enriched populations of spermatogonia and early primary spermatocytes from rat testes. Biol Reprod. 1986;34(1):195–206. doi:10.1095/biolreprod34.1.195.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Bellve AR, et al. Spermatogenic cells of the prepuberal mouse. Isolation and morphological characterization. J Cell Biol. 1977;74(1):68–85. doi:10.1083/jcb.74.1.68.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Dym M, et al. Expression of c-kit receptor and its autophosphorylation in immature rat type A spermatogonia. Biol Reprod. 1995;52(1):8–19. doi:10.1095/biolreprod52.1.8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Dirami G, et al. Effects of stem cell factor and granulocyte macrophage-colony stimulating factor on survival of porcine type A spermatogonia cultured in KSOM. Biol Reprod. 1999;61(1):225–30. doi:10.1095/biolreprod61.1.225.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Ogawa T, et al. Xenogeneic spermatogenesis following transplantation of hamster germ cells to mouse testes. Biol Reprod. 1999;60(2):515–21. doi:10.1095/biolreprod60.2.515.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Dobrinski I, Avarbock MR, Brinster RL. Germ cell transplantation from large domestic animals into mouse testes. Mol Reprod Dev. 2000;57(3):270–9. doi:10.1002/1098-2795(200011)57:3<270::AID-MRD9>3.0.CO;2-Z.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Brook PF, et al. Isolation of germ cells from human testicular tissue for low temperature storage and autotransplantation. Fertil Steril. 2001;75(2):269–74. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(00)01721-0.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Nagano M, McCarrey JR, Brinster RL. Primate spermatogonial stem cells colonize mouse testes. Biol Reprod. 2001;64(5):1409–16. doi:10.1095/biolreprod64.5.1409.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Nagano M, Patrizio P, Brinster RL. Long-term survival of human spermatogonial stem cells in mouse testes. Fertil Steril. 2002;78(6):1225–33. doi:10.1016/S0015-0282(02)04345-5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Schlatt S, et al. Germ cell transplantation into X-irradiated monkey testes. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(1):55–62. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.1.55.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Shinohara T, et al. Birth of offspring following transplantation of cryopreserved immature testicular pieces and in-vitro microinsemination. Hum Reprod. 2002;17(12):3039–45. doi:10.1093/humrep/17.12.3039.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. freshney, culture of animal cells : a manual of basic techniques 5ed. 2006. 175.

Download references

Acknowledgment

The author would like to thank Dr Reza Omani Samani, Dr. Daneshzadeh, Dr. Khakzad, Miss Shabani and Dr. Afshani for their creative ideas and practical help and support during the time of study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Firooz Jannat Alipoor.

Additional information

Capsule In this study spermatogonia cells from mouse testis were isolated by MACS method and the effect of FBS concentration on cell survival was assessed during cryopreservation.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Alipoor, F.J., Gilani, M.A.S., Eftekhari-Yazdi, P. et al. Achieving high survival rate following cryopreservation after isolation of prepubertal mouse spermatogonial cells. J Assist Reprod Genet 26, 143–149 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9298-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-009-9298-6

Keywords

Navigation