Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 65–68 | Cite as

Endometrial receptivity is preserved in Diethylstilbestrol-associated and other Müllerian anomalies: Evidence from tubal embryo transfer

  • Eliran Mor
  • Melanie Landay
  • Richard J. Paulson



To report implantation and pregnancy rates following TET in women with anomalous uteri, and to compare these with previously reported rates following trans-cervical ET.

Materials and Methods

Between 1995 and 2003, 12 TET procedures were performed in seven women with Müllerian anomalies. Tubal ET was performed via laparoscopy 48 h after standard IVF in 3 cycles in two patients, whereas in 9 cycles in five patients, TET was performed 24 h or 48 h following oocyte donation.


Of the seven patients, 5 (71%) had a history of 15 failed cycles with trans-cervical ET. The 12 TET procedures resulted in eleven clinical pregnancies (92%; 95% CI: 63, 99%). There were seven deliveries/ongoing pregnancies (58%; 95% CI: 27%, 85%).


We observed high implantation and ongoing pregnancy rates in women with Müllerian anomalies, suggesting that 1) endometrial receptivity in anomalous uteri is preserved, and 2) transfer efficiency is reduced but may be restored with the use of TET.


Diethylstilbestrol Endometrial receptivity Müllerian anomalies Tubal embryo transfer 


  1. 1.
    Acién P. Incidence of Mullerian defects in fertile and infertile women. Hum Reprod. 1997;12:1372–6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/12.3.423.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heinonen PK, Kuismanen K, Ashorn R. Assisted reproduction in women with uterine anomalies. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2000;89:181–4. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00198-0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lavergne N, Aristizabal J, Zarka V, Erny R, Hedon B. Uterine anomalies and in vitro fertilization: what are the results? Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1996;68:29–34. doi: 10.1016/0301-2115(96)02459-1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Attia KI, Hug-Koronya M, Ginsburg ES, Hornstein MD. Effects of müllerian anomalies on in vitro fertilization outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2001;18:544–7. doi: 10.1023/A:1011950202480.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Karande VC, Lester RG, Muasher SJ, Jones DL, Acosta AA, Jones HW Jr. Are implantation and pregnancy outcome impaired in diethylstilbesterol-exposed women after in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer? Fertil Steril. 1990;54:287–91.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noyes N, Liu HC, Sultan K, Rosenwaks Z. Endometrial pattern in diethylstilbesterol-exposed women undergoing in-vitro fertilization may be the most significant predictor of pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod. 1996;11:2719–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Pal L, Shifren JL, Isaacson KB, Chang Y, Marean M, Leykin L, Toth TL. Outcome of in vitro fertilization in diethylstilbesterol-exposed daughters: experience in the nineties. J Assist Reprod Genet. 1997;14:513–7. doi: 10.1023/A:1021175326230.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kerjean A, Poirot C, Epelboin S, Jouannet P. Effect of in-utero diethylstilbestrol exposure on human oocyte quality and fertilization in a programme of in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:1578–81. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.6.1578.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Muasher SJ, Garcia JE, Jones HW Jr. Experience with diethylstilbestrol-exposed infertile women in an program of in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 1984;42:20–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Paulson RJ, Sauer MV, Lobo RA. Factors affecting embryo implantation after human in vitro fertilization: a hypothesis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1990;163:2020–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Habana AE, Palter SF. Is tubal embryo transfer of any value? A meta-analysis and comparison with the Society of Assisted Reproductive Technology database. Fertil Steril 2001;76:286–93. doi: 10.1016/S0015-0282(01)01879-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eliran Mor
    • 1
  • Melanie Landay
    • 1
  • Richard J. Paulson
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyUniversity of Southern California Keck School of MedicineLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations