Skip to main content
Log in

Interval double transfer improves treatment success in patients with repeated IVF/ET failures

  • Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To examine whether double transfer of embryos on day 2–3 and on day 5 after ovum pick-up (OPU) improves IVF/ET success rates in patients with multiple consecutive IVF failures

Methods

Consecutive IVF failures patients (7.6 ± 0.5) undergoing IVF/ET cycles were treated with interval double transfer on day 2–3 and on day 5 after OPU. Matched patients, that had embryos transferred only once on day 2 or 3 served as controls.

Results

Baseline and cycle characteristics were similar in the study group and controls. The total pregnancy rate was 44.6% in the study group and 24.2% in the controls (p = 0.001), and the clinical pregnancy rates were 38.5% and 19.6%, respectively (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Patients with multiple consecutive IVF/ET failures, treated with the interval double transfer approach had significantly improved cycle success rates compared with regular day 2 or 3 embryo transfer protocol.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Requena A, Martinez-Salazar FJ, Landazabal A, Remohi J, et al. High doses of gonadotrophins combined with stop versus non-stop protocol of GnRH analogue administration in low responder IVF patients: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Hum Reprod. 2000;15:2292–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Garcia-Velasco JA, Moreno L, Pacheco A, Guillen A, Duque L, Requena A, et al. The aromatase inhibitor letrozole increases the concentration of intraovarian androgens and improves in vitro fertilization outcome in low responder patients: a pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2005;84:82–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim CH, Chae HD, Chang YS. Pyridostigmine cotreatment for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation in low responders undergoing in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1999;71:652–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Moreno C, Ruiz A, Simon C, Pellicer A, Remohi J. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection as a routine indication in low responder patients. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:2126–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pinkas H, Orvieto R, Avrech OM, Rufas O, Ferber A, Ben-Rafael Z, et al. Gonadotropin stimulation following GnRH-a priming for poor responders in in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer programs. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2000;14:11–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Requena A, Neuspiller F, Cobo AC, Aragones M, Remohi J, Simon C, et al. The potential use of maturation in vitro of human oocytes in low responder patients. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2000;17:239–44.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Abramovici H, Dirnfeld M, Weisman Z, Sorokin Y, Lissak A, Rofe A, et al. Pregnancies following the interval double-transfer technique in an in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer program. J In Vitro Fert Embryo Transf. 1988;5:175–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Loutradis D, Drakakis P, Dallianidis K, Bletsa SR, Milingos S, Doumplis N, et al. A double embryo transfer on days 2 and 4 or 5 improves pregnancy outcome in patients with good embryos but repeated failures in IVF or ICSI. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2004;31:63–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ledee-Bataille N, Dubanchet S, Coulomb-L’hermine A, Durand-Gasselin I, Frydman R, Chaouat G. A new role for natural killer cells, interleukin (IL)-12, and IL-18 in repeated implantation failure after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:59–65.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Romero R, Espinoza J, Mazor M. Can endometrial infection/inflammation explain implantation failure, spontaneous abortion, and preterm birth after in vitro fertilization? Fertil Steril. 2004;82:799–804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Inagaki N, Stern C, McBain J, Lopata A, Kornman L, Wilkinson D. Analysis of intra-uterine cytokine concentration and matrix-metalloproteinase activity in women with recurrent failed embryo transfer. Hum Reprod. 2003;18:608–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. Dramatic declines in implantation and pregnancy rates in patients who undergo repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization with blastocyst transfer after one or more failed attempts. Fertil Steril. 2001;76:538–42.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Meldrum DR, Silverberg KM, Bustillo M, Stokes L. Success rate with repeated cycles of in vitro fertilization–embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 1998;69:1005–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Wright VC, Schieve LA, Reynolds MA, Jeng G. Assisted reproductive technology surveillance—United States, 2002. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2005;54:1–24.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Peterson CM, Reading JC, Hatasaka HH, Parker Jones K, Udoff LC, Adashi EY, et al. Use of outcomes-based data in reducing high-order multiple pregnancies: the role of age, diagnosis, and embryo score. Fertil Steril. 2004;81:1534–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Machtinger R, Dor J, Margolin M, Levron J, Baum M, Ferber B, et al. Sequential transfer of day 3 embryos and blastocysts after previous IVF failures despite adequate ovarian response. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13:376–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Barash A, Dekel N, Fieldust S, Segal I, Schechtman E, Granot I. Local injury to the endometrium doubles the incidence of successful pregnancies in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2003;79:1317–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bungum M, Bungum L, Humaidan P, Yding Andersen C. Day 3 versus day 5 embryo transfer: a prospective randomized study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2003;7:98–104.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Karaki RZ, Samarraie SS, Younis NA, Lahloub TM, Ibrahim MH. Blastocyst culture and transfer: a step toward improved in vitro fertilization outcome. Fertil Steril. 2002;77:114–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Papanikolaou EG, Kolibianakis EM, Tournaye H, Venetis CA, Fatemi H, Tarlatzis B, et al. Live birth rates after transfer of equal number of blastocysts or cleavage-stage embryos in IVF. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod. 2008;23:91–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

Tatyana Cohen and Ariela Carmon from IVF laboratory and Esther Eshkol is thanked for editorial assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Almog.

Additional information

Capsule Patients with consecutive repeated IVF/ET failures, treated with the interval double transfer had significantly improved cycle success rates compared with regular day 3 embryo transfer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Almog, B., Levin, I., Wagman, I. et al. Interval double transfer improves treatment success in patients with repeated IVF/ET failures. J Assist Reprod Genet 25, 353–357 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-008-9237-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-008-9237-y

Keywords

Navigation