Advertisement

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 24, Issue 4, pp 107–109 | Cite as

Legal and ethical issues in the international transaction of donor sperm and eggs

  • Boon Chin Heng
Around the World

Abstract

Pertinent ethical and legal issues in the international transaction of donor sperm and eggs are discussed. Firstly, there may be legislative and ethical “contradiction” by the local health authority in permitting import of donor gametes, due to varying policies on donor reimbursement in different countries. This is particularly significant in countries where the underlying principle of gamete donation is altruistic motivation, and where reimbursement is given only for direct “out-of-pocket” expenses i.e. traveling costs. Secondly, there is a lack of clear and coherent internationally-binding legislation and regulatory guidelines overseeing the exchange of donor gametes across international borders. In particular, provisions should be made for donor traceability if gametes are sourced from abroad. Thirdly, in the case of “frozen-egg donation” from abroad, patients must rightfully be informed that current cryopreservation technology is still sub-optimal, and all studies have consistently shown that the chances of conception are always lower with “frozen-eggs” compared to freshly-retrieved eggs. Finally, regulatory safeguards should be put in place to prevent fertility clinics and medical professionals from “re-selling” imported donor gametes at a profit to the patient, since it would be thoroughly unprofessional for them to earn a profit simply through the ‘brokerage’ of donated human material.

Keywords

Eggs Ethics Export Gametes Import Legal Sperm 

References

  1. 1.
    Fishman RH. Infertility doctors use egg donors worldwide. Lancet 1999;353(9154):736.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zachary GP. Global sperm trade a fertile business. WALL STREET JOURNAL. Friday, January 7, 2000. Accessible at: http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?fileu=/examiner/archive/2000/01/07/NEWS7186.dtl&type=printable (Date accessed on 28 September 2006).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Daniels KR. To give or sell human gametes–the interplay between pragmatics, policy and ethics. J Med Ethics 2000;26(3):206–11.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daniels K, Feyles V, Nisker J, Perez-y-Perez M, Newton C, Parker JA, Tekpetey F, Haase J. Sperm donation: implications of Canada’s Assisted Human Reproduction Act 2004 for recipients, donors, health professionals, and institutions. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2006;28(7):608–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sauer MV. Reproductive prohibition: restricting donor payment will lead to medical tourism. Hum Reprod 1997;12(9):1844–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Budev MM, Arroliga AC, Falcone T. Ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. Crit Care Med 2005;33(10 Suppl):S301–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Jonge C, Barratt CL. Gamete donation: a question of anonymity. Fertil Steril 2006;85(2):500–1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dyer C. Shortage of sperm donors predicted when anonymity goes. BMJ. 2004;328(7434):244. No abstract available.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pinnelli A, Di Cesare M. Human fertility: sociodemographic aspects. Contraception 2005;72(4):303–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    The SEED report. The Human Fertilization and Embryology Authority (HFEA) of the United Kingdom, October 2005. Acessible at: http://www.hfea.gov.uk/cps/rde/xbcr/SID-3F57D79B-F1C961A1/hfea/SEEDReport05.pdf (Date accessed: 28 September 2006).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Willing R. U.S. sperm banks to give gift of life to the U.K. USA TODAY, 14 August 2002. Acessible at: http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/2002-08-14-spermbank_x.htm (Date accessed: 28 September 2006).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Browne A. Sperm firm gears up for new Viking invasion of Britain. THE TIMES, 27 November 2004. Accessible at: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,3-1376204,00.html (Date accessed: 28 September 2006).Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    The Sperm Bank of NY, Inc. website. Accessible at: http://www.sperm1.com/sbny/donor.html#Anchor-When-60463 (Date accessed: 28 September 2006).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burgermeister J. Doctors hail new EU directive on tissues and cells. BMJ 2004;328(7430):10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cryo Eggs International Inc. website. Accessible at: www. cryoeggsintl.com (Date accessed: 28 September 2006).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    The Donor Egg Bank Inc. website. Accessible at: www. donoreggbankinc.com (Date accessed: 28 September 2006).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Koutlaki N, Schoepper B, Maroulis G, Diedrich K, Al-Hasani S. Human oocyte cryopreservation: past, present and future. Reprod Biomed Online. 2006;13(3):427–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Porcu E, Venturoli S. Progress with oocyte cryopreservation. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2006;18(3):273–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations