Skip to main content
Log in

Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome

  • Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective: To compare natural vs. hormone replacement treatment (HRT) for cryo-thaw embryo transfer cycles in patients with frozen embryos from previous ART. Design and Settings: Retrospective chart review of 164 patients (242 cycles) who underwent natural or HRT cryo-thaw embryo transfer between January 2002 and April 2005. Main Outcome Measures: Pregnancy rates per transfer in natural and HRT cryo-thaw cycles. Results: The pregnancy rate per transfer was higher with natural cycles (36.76% vs. 22.99%, P = 0.0298). There was no statistical difference in mean age, endometrial thickness, and average embryo quality in successful cycles. Mean endometrial thickness prior to transfer was greater in natural cycles (9.95 vs. 8.89 mm, P < 0.001). Mean serum estradiol levels were higher in the HRT group prior to transfer (526.1 vs. 103.8 pg/ml, P < 0.001), and were found to be lower in women who achieved pregnancy (337.1 vs. 433.3 pg/ml, P = 0.0136). Conclusion: Hormone replacement in preparation for cryo-thaw transfer of embryos was found to be associated with decreased pregnancy rates in comparison to natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer. Greater endometrial thickness was achieved with lower serum estradiol levels in patients undergoing natural cycles, suggesting that higher estradiol levels during HRT cycle may interfere with the window of implantation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. http://www.cdc.gov/ART/ART2003/section3.htm

  2. Wang JX, Yap YY, Matthews CD. Frozen-thawed embryo transfer: influence of clinical factors on implantation rate and risk of multiple conception. Hum Reprod 2001;16(11):2316–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dickey RP, Olar TT, Curole DN, Taylor SN, Rye PH. Endometrial pattern and thickness associated with pregnancy outcome after assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod 1992;7(3):418–21

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Noyes N, Liu HC, Sultan K, Schattman G, Rosenwaks Z. Endometrial Thickness appears to be a significant factor in embryo implantation in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1995;10(4):919–22

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Oehninger S, Mayer J, Muasher S. Impact of different clinical variables on pregnancy outcome following embryo cryopreservation. Mol Cell Endocrinol 2000;169(1–2):73–7

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Queenan JT Jr, Veeck LL, Seltman HJ, Muasher SJ. Transfer of cryopreserved-thawed pre-embryos in a natural cycle or a programmed cycle with exogenous hormonal replacement yields similar pregnancy results. Fertil Steril 1994;62(3):545–50

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sathanandan M, Macnamee MC, Rainsbury P, Wick K, Brinsden P, Edwards RG. Replacement of frozen-thawed embryos in artificial and natural cycles: A prospective semi-randomized study. Hum Reprod 1991;6(5):685–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. al-Shawaf T, Yang D, al-Magid Y, Seaton A, Iketubosin F, Craft I. Ultrasonic monitoring during replacement of frozen/thawed embryos in natural and hormone replacement cycles. Hum Reprod 1993;8(12):2068–74

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tanos V, Friedler S, Zajicek G, Neiger M, Lewin A, Schenker JG. The impact of endometrial preparation on implantation following cryopreserved-thawed-embryo transfer. Gynecol Obstet Invest 1996;41(4):227–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Loh SK, Leong NK. Factors affecting sussecc in an embryo cryopreservation programme. Ann Acad Med, Singapore 1999;28(2):260–5

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sathanandan M, Macnamee MC, Rainsbury P, Wick K, Brinsden P, Edwards RG. Replacement of frozen-thawed embryos in artificial and natural cycles: a prospective semi-randomized study. Hum Reprod 1991;6(5):685–7

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Adams SM, Terry V, Hosie MJ, Gayer N, Murphy CR. Endometrial response to IVF hormonal manipulation: Comparative analysis of menopausal, down regulated and natural cycles. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2004;2:21

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ma WG, Song H, Das SK, Paria BC, Dey SK. Estrogen is a critical determinant that specifies the duration of the window of uterine receptivity for implantation. Proc National Acad Sci, USA 2003;100(5):2963–8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Leal Almeida M, Saucedo de la Llata E, Batiza Resendiz V, Santos Haliscak R, Galache Vega P, Hernandez Ayup S. Endometrial thickness. Prognostic factor in assisted reproduction? [Spanish] Ginecologia y Obstetricia de Mexico 2004;72:116–9

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rashidi BH, Sadeghi M, Jafarabadi M, Tehrani Nejad ES. Relationships between pregnancy rates following in vitro fertilization or intracytoplasmic sperm injection and endometrial thickness and pattern. European J Obstetrics, Gynecol, Reprod Biol 2005;120(2):179–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Elizur SE, Lerner-Geva L, Levron J, Shulman A, Bider D, Dor J. Factors predicting IVF treatment outcome: a multivariate analysis of 5310 cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2005;10(5):645–9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jansen RP. The effect of female age on the likelihood of a live birth from one in-vitro fertilisation treatment. Med J Australia 2003;178(6):258–61

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Miles RA et al. Pharmacokinetics and endometrial tissue levels of progesterone after administration by intramuscular and vaginal routes: a comparative study. Fertil Steril 1994;62(3):485–90

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vadim Morozov.

Additional information

Financial disclosure: none of the above authors had any financial interests with commercial companies.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morozov, V., Ruman, J., Kenigsberg, D. et al. Natural cycle cryo-thaw transfer may improve pregnancy outcome. J Assist Reprod Genet 24, 119–123 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9100-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9100-y

Keywords

Navigation