Abstract
The increasing availability of clinical assisted reproduction has led to an accumulated surplus of frozen embryos within fertility clinics worldwide. Couples that have attained success in clinical assisted reproduction, and have no further desire to reproduce; are often faced with an agonizing dilemma on what to do with their surplus frozen embryos—whether to simply discard them, or donate either for scientific research or to other infertile couples. There is a risk that persons or institutions directly involved in procuring donated embryos will prioritize their own interests over the informed choice of the patient to donate either for scientific research or to other infertile couples. Very often, formerly infertile couples who have attained reproductive success feel an overwhelming sense of gratitude to the fertility doctor handling their treatment. Hence, there is a risk of medical professionals exercising undue influence on their former patients, to sway the final decision to their preferred outcome. In the private practice setting, the preferred outcome would likely be donation for the treatment of other infertile couples; whilst in the case of medical professionals affiliated with research or academic institutions, the preferred outcome would likely be donation for stem cell research.
References
Edwards RG, Beard HK. Destruction of cryopreserved embryos. UK law dictated the destruction of 3000 cryopreserved human embryos. Hum Reprod. 1997;12(1):3–5.
Bankowski BJ, Lyerly AD, Faden RR, Wallach EE. The social implications of embryo cryopreservation. Fertil Steril 2005;84(4):823–32.
Hammarberg K, Tinney L. Deciding the fate of supernumerary frozen embryos: a survey of couples’ decisions and the factors influencing their choice. Fertil Steril 2006;86(1):86–91
Bangsboll S, Pinborg A, Yding Andersen C, Nyboe Andersen A. Patients’ attitudes towards donation of surplus cryopreserved embryos for treatment or research. Hum Reprod 2004;19(10):2415–9.
McMahon CA, Gibson FL, Leslie GI, Saunders DM, Porter KA, Tennant CC. Embryo donation for medical research: attitudes and concerns of potential donors. Hum Reprod 2003;18(4):871–7.
Nachtigall RD, Becker G, Friese C, Butler A, MacDougall K. Parents’ conceptualization of their frozen embryos complicates the disposition decision. Fertil Steril 2005;84(2):431–4.
Janssens PM, Simons AH, van Kooij RJ, Blokzijl E, Dunselman GA. A new Dutch Law regulating provision of identifying information of donors to offspring: background, content and impact. Hum Reprod 2006;21(4):852–6.
Hampton T. Anonymity of gamete donations debated. JAMA 2005;294(21):2681–3.
Guerin JF. The Donation of Gametes is Possible without Paying Donors: Experience of the French CECOS Federation. Centre for the Cryopreservation of Eggs and Semen. Hum Reprod 1998;13(5):1129–30.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Heng, B.C. Donation of surplus frozen embryos for stem cell research or fertility treatment—Should medical professionals and healthcare institutions be allowed to exercise undue influence on the informed decision of their former patients?. J Assist Reprod Genet 23, 381–382 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9070-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9070-0