Skip to main content
Log in

Outcome of frozen-thawed blastocysts derived from gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist or antagonist cycles

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this retrospective study was to compare the outcome of frozen-thawed blastocysts derived from the cycles using controlled ovarian stimulation with GnRH agonists vs. GnRH antagonists.

Methods: Survival, pregnancy and cumulative live birth rates in 231 freeze-thaw cycles derived from the GnRH agonist cycles (GnRH agonist group), and in 175 freeze-thaw cycles derived from the GnRH antagonist cycles (GnRH antagonist group) were compared.

Results: In the GnRH agonist group significantly higher proportion of blastocysts survived the thawing procedure than in the GnRH antagonist group (86.1% versus 78.5%; p < 0.01). The differences in cumulative live birth rates did not differ significantly between the groups: in the GnRH agonist group the cumulative live birth rate was 16.5%, and in the GnRH antagonist group it was 14.2%.

Conclusions: Frozen-thawed blastocysts derived from the GnRH agonist cycles have better survival rates and similar cumulative live birth rates than those derived from the GnRH antagonist cycles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Felberbaum RE, Ludwig M, Lunenfeld B, Diedrich K: GnRH antagonists in assisted reproduction. In: Lunenfeld B, editor. GnRH analogues. The state of the Art 2001. London, The Parthenon Publishing Group; 2002. pp. 71–86

  2. Tarlatzis BC: The use of GnRH antagonists in ovarian stimulation for assisted reproduction techniques. In: Meden-Vrtovec H, Pirc M, Trenkič M, editors. Proceedings of 2nd International Symposium on Assisted Reproduction of Slovenian Association of Reproductive Medicine. Ljubljana, Slovenian Association of Reproductive Medicine; 1999. p. 31

  3. Daya S: GnRH agonists versus antagonists in assisted reproduction—A systematic review. In: Lunenfeld B, Emons G, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on GnRH analogues in cancer and human reproduction. Final Program & Book of Abstracts. Salzburg, Kenes International; 2005. p. A100

  4. Diedrich K, Felberbaum R, Schultze-Mosgau A, Griesinger G: GnRH agonist vs. GnRH antagonist: Is there a difference in the clinical results? Data from the German IVF registry (DIR). In: Lunenfeld B, Emons G, editors. Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on GnRH analogues in cancer and human reproduction. Final Program & Book of Abstracts. Salzburg, Kenes International; 2005. p. A44

  5. Medved R, Meden-Vrtovec H: Clinical experiences with GnRH antagonist administration in ART procedures. In: Meden-Vrtovec H, editor. Proceedings of the 3rd International Symposium on Assisted Reproduction of Slovenian Association of Reproductive Medicine. Ljubljana, Slovenian Association of Reproductive Medicine; 2003. pp. 43–5

  6. Nikolettos N, Asimakopoulos B, Simopoulou M, Al-Hasani S, Diedrich K: Gonadotropin releasing hormone antagonists and cryopreservation outcome: A review. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2004;270:69–73

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Meden-Vrtovec H, Virant-Klun I, Tomaževič T et al: Programme of in vitro fertilization at the department of obstetrics and gynaecology in Ljubljana. Zdrav Vestn 2001;70:89–95

    Google Scholar 

  8. Virant-Klun I, Tomazevic T, Bacer-Kermavner L, Mivsek J, Valentincic-Gruden B, Meden-Vrtovec H: Successful freezing and thawing of blastocysts cultured in sequential media using a modified method. Fertil Steril 2003;79:1428–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Tomaževič T, Geršak K, Meden-Vrtovec H et al: Clinical parameters to predict the success of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer in the natural cycle. Assist Reprod 1999;9:149–56

    Google Scholar 

  10. Medved R: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists vs. agonists in in vitro fertilization. Master Thesis. Ljubljana, Medicinska fakulteta Univerze v Ljubljani; 2002

  11. Albano C, Felberbaum RE, Smitz J et al: Ovarian stimulation with HMG: Results of a prospective randomised phase III European study comparing the luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH)-antagonist cetrorelix and the LHRH-agonist buserelin. Hum Reprod 2000;15:526–31

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. The European Orgalutran® Study Group, Borm G, Mannaerts B: Treatment with the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe and convenient: results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1490–8

    Google Scholar 

  13. Olivennes F, Belaisch-Allart J, Emperaire JC et al: Prospective, randomized, controlled study of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer with a single dose of a luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LH-RH) antagonist (cetrorelix) or a depot formula of an LH-RH agonist (triptorelin). Fertil Steril 2000;73:314–20

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. The European and Middle East Orgalutran® Study Group: Comparable clinical outcome using the GnRH antagonist ganirelix or a long protocol of the GnRH agonist triptorelin for the prevention of premature LH surges in women undergoing ovarian stimulation. Hum Reprod 2001;16:644–51

    Google Scholar 

  15. The North American Ganirelix Study Group: Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 2001;75:38–45

    Google Scholar 

  16. Al-Inany H, Aboulghar M: GnRH antagonist in assisted reproduction: a Cochrane review. Hum Reprod 2002;17:874–85

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Hernandez ER: Embryo implantation and GnRH antagonists. Embryo implantation: the Rubicon for GnRH antagonists. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1211–6

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Seelig AS, Al-Hasani S, Katalinic A et al: Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists or antagonists in the collecting cycle. Fertil Steril 2002;77:472–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nikolettos N, Al-Hasani S, Felberbaum R et al: Comparison of cryopreservation outcome with human pronuclear stage oocytes obtained by the GnRH antagonist, Cetrorelix, and GnRH agonists. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2000;93:91–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Asimakopoulos B, Nikolettos N, Al-Hasani S: Outcome of cryopreserved pronuclear oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation with either HMG or recFSH and the GnRH-antagonist cetrorelix. Reprod Biomed Online 2002;5(Suppl 1,3):52–6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kol S, Lightman A, Hillensjo T et al: High doses of gonadotrophin-releasing hormone antagonist in in-vitro fertilization cycles do not adversely affect the outcome of subsequent freeze-thaw cycles. Hum Reprod 1999;14:2242–4

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Zikopoulos K, Kolibianakis EM, Camus M et al: Duration of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist administration does not affect the outcome of subsequent frozen-thawed cycles. Fertil Steril 2004;81:473–5

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank all members of our IVF team for assistance in the study, to Mojca Pirc, B.A., for editing, and to Dr. Ivan Verdenik, E.E., Ph.D., for assistance with statistical analyses.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert Medved.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Medved, R., Virant-Klun, I., Meden-Vrtovec, H. et al. Outcome of frozen-thawed blastocysts derived from gonadotropin releasing hormone agonist or antagonist cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 23, 275–279 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9051-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-006-9051-3

Keywords

Navigation