Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

, Volume 23, Issue 4, pp 161–169 | Cite as

Power Doppler ultrasound assessment of follicular vascularity in the early follicular phase and its relationship with outcome of in vitro fertilization

  • S. M. Shrestha
  • M. F. Costello
  • P. SjoblomEmail author
  • G. McNally
  • M. Bennett
  • S. J. Steigrad
  • G. J. Hughes
Assisted Reproduction

Objective: To determine whether ovarian perifollicular blood flow (PFBF) in the early follicular phase (EFP) was associated with treatment outcome.

Design: Retrospective longitudinal cohort study.

Setting: Tertiary referral centre/university hospital.

Patients: Thirty-four women underwent 37 IVF cycles, which resulted in 35 embryo transfers.

Interventions: Serial transvaginal scans using power Doppler ultrasound during the follicular phase. Ovarian PFBF of follicles ≥5 mm was subjectively assessed using a modified grading system (grades 0–4).

Main outcome measures: Ovarian PFBF and pregnancy.

Results: Treatment cycles were retrospectively divided into two groups: Group 1 (n=20) had cycles with at least one small (5–10 mm) or medium (11–14 mm) size follicle(s) of high grade (2–4) PFBF on cycle day 5 or 6 or 7; and Group 2 (n=17), had cycles that did not. Group 1 had a significantly higher proportion of high grade large follicles in the late follicular phase (35% vs. 21%) (OR 2.0; 95% CI 1.1–3.7) and higher clinical pregnancy rate (47% vs. 12%) (OR 6.3; CI 1.1–35.7) compared to Group 2.

Conclusion: High grade ovarian PFBF in the EFP during IVF is associated with both high grade PFBF in the late follicular phase and a higher clinical pregnancy rate.


Early follicular phase IVF perifollicular vascularity power Doppler ultrasound pregnancy rate 



The authors wish to thank Dr Gillian Heller, Senior Lecturer, Department of Statistics, Macquarie University, Australia for her kind help in statistical analysis. The authors also would like to acknowledge the IVF Australia-Eastern Suburb clinic nurse coordinators Di Craven, Mary O’Neil and Robyn Grant for their kind cooperation.


  1. 1.
    Adamson D, Lancaster P, de Mouzon J (Coordinator), Nygren K-G (Chairman), Zegers-Hochschild F: (International working group for registrars on assisted reproduction and IFFS task force). World collaborative report on assisted reproductive technology, 1998. In DL Healy, GT Kovacs, R McLachlan, O Rodriguez-Armas (eds), Reproductive medicine in the twenty first century. The Parthenon Publishing Group Ltd., UK, 2001:209–219Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gregory L: Ovarian markers of implantation potential in assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod 1998;13(suppl. 4):117–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Michael AE, Gregory L, Walker SM, Antoniw JW, Shaw RW, Edwards CR, et al.: Ovarian 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase: Potential predictor of conception by in-vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer. Lancet 1993;342:711–712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gregory L, Booth AD, Wells C, Walker SM: A study of the cumulus-corona cell complex in in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer; a prognostic indicator of the failure of implantation. Hum Reprod 1994;9:1308–1317PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chui DK, Pugh ND, Walker SM, Gregory L, Shaw RW: Follicular vascularity—the predictive value of transvaginal power Doppler ultrasonography in an in-vitro fertilization programme: a preliminary study. Hum Reprod 1997;12:191–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bhal PS, Pugh ND, Chui DK, Gregory L, Walker SM, Shaw RW: The use of transvaginal power Doppler ultrasonography to evaluate the relationship between perifollicular vascularity and outcome in in-vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1999;14:939–945PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Borini A, Maccolini A, Tallarini A, Bonu MA, Sciajno R, Flamigni C: Perifollicular vascularity and its relationship with oocyte maturity and IVF outcome Ann N Y Acad Sci 2001;943:64–67PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Barnett SB, Ter Haar GR, Ziskin MC, Rott HD, Duck FA, Maeda K: International recommendations and guidelines for the safe use of diagnostic ultrasound in medicine. Ultrasound Med Biol 2000;26:355–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zaidi J, Jurkovic D, Campbell S, Pittrof R, McGregor A, Tan SL: Description of circadian rhythm in uterine artery blood flow during the peri-ovulatory period. Hum Reprod 1995;10:1642–1646PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    McDicken WN: Processing of Doppler signals. Diagnostic Ultrasonics-Principles and Use of Instruments, 3rd edn., Churchill Livingstone, Edinburgh, 1991,231–247Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weiner Z, Thaler I, Levron J, Lewit N, Itskovitz-Eldor J: Assessment of ovarian and uterine blood flow by transvaginal color Doppler in ovarian-stimulated women: correlation with the number of follicles and steroid hormone levels. Fertil Steril 1993;59:743–749PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gosling RG, Dunbar G, King DH, Newman DL, Side CD, Woodcock JP, et al.: The quantitative analysis of occlusive peripheral arterial disease by a non-intrusive ultrasonic technique. Angiology 1971;22:52–55PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Maulik D: Haemodynamic interpretation of the arterial Doppler waveform. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 1993;3219–3227Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Taylor KJ, Burns PN, Wells PN, Conway DI, Hull MG: Ultrasound Doppler flow studies of the ovarian and uterine arteries. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1985;92:240–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kupesic S, Kurjak A: Uterine and ovarian perfusion during the periovulatory period assessed by transvaginal color Doppler. Fertil Steril 1993;60:439–443PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Coulam CB, Goodman C, Rinehart JS: Colour Doppler indices of follicular blood flow as predictors of pregnancy after in-vitro fertilization and embryo transfer. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1979–1982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Huey S, Abuhamad A, Barroso G, Hsu MI, Kolm P, Mayer J, et al. Perifollicular blood flow Doppler indices, but not follicular pO2, pCO2, or pH, predict oocyte developmental competence in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1999;72: 707– 712PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    MacSweeney JE, Cosgrove DO, Arenson J: Colour Doppler energy (power) mode ultrasound. Clin Radiol 1996;51:387–390PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rubin JM, Bude RO, Carson PL, Bree RL, Adler RS: Power Doppler US: a potentially useful alternative to mean frequency-based color Doppler US. Radiology 1994;190:853–856PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Costello MF, Sjoblom P, Shrestha SM: Use of Doppler ultrasound imaging of the ovary during IVF treatment as a predictor of success. In KA Rao, PR Brinsden, H Sathananthan (eds), The Infertility Manual, JAYPEE Brothers Medical Publishers, New Delhi, 2003, 344–349Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Van Blerkom J: Intrafollicular influences on human oocyte developmental competence: perifollicular vascularity, oocyte metabolism and mitochondrial function. Hum Reprod 2000;15 (suppl. 2):173–188PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Anasti JN, Kalantaridou SN, Kimzey LM, George M, Nelson LM: Human follicle fluid vascular endothelial growth factor concentrations are correlated with luteinization in spontaneously developing follicles. Hum Reprod 1998;13:1144–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Findlay JK: Angiogenesis in reproductive tissues. J Endocrinol 1986;111:357–366PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Gordon JD, Shifren JL, Foulk RA, Taylor RN, Jaffe RB: Angiogenesis in the human female reproductive tract. Obstet Gynecol Survey 1995;50:688–697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hazzard TM, Stouffer RL: Angiogenesis in ovarian follicular and luteal development. Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2000;14:883–900PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zaidi J, Barber J, Kyei-Mensah A, Bekir J, Campbell S, Tan SL: Relationship of ovarian stromal blood flow at the baseline ultrasound scan to subsequent follicular response in an in vitro fertilization program. Obstet Gynecol 1996;88:779–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Bassil S, Wyns C, Toussaint-Demylle D, Nisolle M, Gordts S, Donnez J: The relationship between ovarian vascularity and the duration of stimulation in in-vitro fertilization. Hum Reprod 1997;12:1240–1245PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Engmann L, Sladkevicius P, Agrawal R, Bekir JS, Campbell S, Tan SL: Value of ovarian stromal blood flow velocity measurement after pituitary suppression in the prediction of ovarian responsiveness and outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment. Fertil Steril 1999;71:22–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Altundag M, Levi R, Adakan S, Goker EN, Killi R, Ozcakir T,et al.: Intraovarian stromal artery Doppler indices in predicting ovarian response. J Reprod Med 2002;47:886–890PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Dickey RP: Doppler ultrasound investigation of uterine and ovarian blood flow in infertility and early pregnancy. Hum Reprod Update 1997;3:467–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. M. Shrestha
    • 1
    • 2
  • M. F. Costello
    • 1
    • 2
  • P. Sjoblom
    • 1
    • 2
    • 4
    Email author
  • G. McNally
    • 3
  • M. Bennett
    • 1
  • S. J. Steigrad
    • 2
  • G. J. Hughes
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Women's and Children's HealthUniversity of New South WalesSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Reproductive Medicine and IVFMaroubraAustralia
  3. 3.Department of Medical ImagingRoyal Hospital for WomenRandwickAustralia
  4. 4.Fertility Centre Scandinavia StockholmStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations