Purpose : To compare outcomes in patients with unexplained infertility undergoing conventional in vitro fertilization (IVF) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).
Methods : Sixty women with unexplained infertility in a Canadian tertiary-level clinic were randomized to IVF or ICSI. Subjects underwent downregulation with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist prior to initiation of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone. The primary outcome measure was fertilization rate. Secondary outcomes included implantation rate, embryo quality, clinical pregnancy rate, and live birth rate.
Results : There was no statistically significant difference in fertilization rate (77.2% IVF vs. 82.4% ICSI), implantation rate (38.2% IVF vs. 44.4% ICSI), clinical pregnancy rate (50% in each group), or live birth rate (46.7% IVF vs. 50% ICSI). There were two cases of failed fertilization in the IVF group. There was no significant difference in embryo quality between groups.
Conclusions : There were no differences in clinical outcomes associated with IVF versus ICSI in the treatment of unexplained infertility.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
Fishel S, Aslam I, Lisi F, Rinaldi L, Timson J, Jacobson M, Gobetz L, Green S, Campbell A, Lisi R: Should ICSI be the treatment of choice for all cases of in-vitro conception? Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1278–1283
Khamsi F, Yavas Y, Roberge S, Wong J, Lacanna I, M: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection increased fertilization and good-quality embryo formation in patients with non-male factor indications for in vitro fertilization: A prospective randomized study. Fertil Steril 2001; 75:342–347
World Health Organization: WHO Laboratory Manual for the Examination of Human Sperm and Sperm–Cervical Mucus Interaction. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press, 1992.
Bhattacharya S, Hamilton M, Shaaban M, Khalaf Y,, Ghobara T, Braude P, Kennedy R, Rutherford A, Hartshorne G, Templeton A: Conventional in-vitro fertilisation versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection for the treatment of non-male factor infertility: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2001; 357:2075–2079
Bukulmez O, Yarali H, Yucel A, Sari T, Gurgan T: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection versus in vitro fertilization for patients with a tubal factor as their sole cause of infertility: A prospective, randomized trial. Fertil Steril 2000; 73:38–42
Aboulghar M, Mansour R, Serour G, Sattar M, Amin Y: Intracytoplasmic sperm injection and conventional in vitro fertilization for sibling oocytes in cases of unexplained infertility and borderline semen. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996; 13:38–42
Ruiz A, Remohi J, Minguez Y, Guanes P, Simon C, Pellicer A: The role of in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection in couples with unexplained infertility after failed intrauterine insemination. Fertil Steril 1987; 68:171–173
Bonduelle M, Camus M, de Vos A, Staessen C, Tournaye H, van Assche E, Verheyen G, Devroey P, Liebaers I, van Steirteghem A: Seven years of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and follow-up of 1987 subsequent children. Hum Reprod 1999; 14(Suppl 1):243–264
Loft A, Petersen K, Erb K, Mikkelsen A, Grinsted J, Hald F, Hindkjaer J, Nielsen KM, Lundstrom P, Gabrielsen A, Lenz S, Hornnes P, Ziebe S, Erjdrup HB, Lindhard A, Zhou Y, Nyboe Andersen A: A Danish national cohort of 730 infants born after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) 1994–1997. Hum Reprod 1999; 14:2143–2148
Manning M, Lissens W, Bonduelle M, Camus M, de Rijcke M, Liebaers I, van Steirteghem A: Study of DNA-methylation patterns at chromosome 15q11–q13 in children born after ICSI reveals no imprinting defects. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6:1049–1053
Wennerholm U, Bergh C, Hamberger L, Lundin K, Nilsson L, Wikland M, Kallen B. Incidence of congenital malformations in children born after ICSI. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:944–948
Shoukir Y, Chardonnens D, Campana A, Sakkas D: Blastocyst development from supernumerary embryos after intracytoplasmic sperm injection: A paternal influence? Hum Reprod 1998; 13:1632–1637
Perry A, Wakayama T, Kishikawa H, Kasai T, Okabe M, Toyoda Y, Yanagimachi R: Mammalian transgenesis by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Science 1999; 284:1180–1183
Chan A, Luetjens C, Dominko T, Ramalho-Santos J, Simerly C, Hewitson L, Schatten G: Foreign DNA transmission by ICSI: Injection of spermatozoa bound with exogenous DNA results in embryonic GFP expression and live rhesus monkey births. Mol Hum Reprod 2000; 6:26–33
Griffiths T, Murdoch A, Herbert M: Embryonic development in vitro is compromised by the ICSI procedure. Hum Reprod 2000; 15:1592–1596
Dumoulin J, Coonen E, Bras M, Bergers-Janssen J, Ignoul-Vanvuchelen R, van Wissen L, Geraedts JP, Evers JL: Embryo development and chromosomal anomalies after ICSI: Effect of the injection procedure. Hum Reprod 2001; 16:306–312
Gordon J: Micromanipulation of gametes and embryos may be a risk for human germ-line gene transfer. Fertil Steril 2002; 78:455–459
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
We wish to acknowledge Serono Canada Inc. for their financial support, Cheryl Swaby, R. N. and Joan Auckland, R. N. for their assistance in study coordination, and Monica Jack for reviewing this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Foong, S.C., Fleetham, J.A., O’Keane, J.A. et al. A prospective randomized trial of conventional in vitro fertilization versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection in unexplained infertility. J Assist Reprod Genet 23, 137–140 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-9008-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-9008-y