Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Optimized Hormonal Stimulation Is Critical for Production of Viable Embryos and Establishment of Subsequent Implantation

  • Assisted Reproduction
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Purpose  : To investigate the effects of follicle number and size at the time of hCG administration, and ovarian stimulation length on the outcome of in vitro fertilization and pregnancy rate.

Methods  : During the ovarian stimulation regimen, the follicular number and size were determined by transvaginal ultrasonographic examination. Ovulation was induced as early as three or more follicles were at least 16 mm in their greatest diameter.

Results  : The fertilization rates were significantly increased with the longer length of stimulation (10–12 days: 75.4% and 13–16 days: 83.2%). However, no significant differences in the chemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, and implantation rates were found between 10–12 days (53.7%, 43.9%, and 21.8%) and 13–16 days (50.0%, 43.8%, and 23.4%) of stimulation. There were no significant differences in fertilization and chemical pregnancy rates between two groups with ≥ and <18 follicles in the ovaries on the day of hCG (human chorionic gonadotrophin) administration. However, the clinical pregnancy and implantation rates (47.2% and 26.0%) in the group with <18 follicles were significantly higher than those (33.3% and 15.5%) in the group with ≥18 follicles, respectively.

Conclusions  : Excessive and rapid ovarian stimulation appears to decrease the survival of embryos at later stages after transfer. The advantage of prolonged stimulation may outweigh the potential adverse effects in some patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Van Wissen B, Eisenberg C, Debey P, Pennehouat G, Auger J, Bomsel-Helmreich O: In vitro DNA fluorescense after in vitro fertilization (IVF) failure. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:564–571

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiu TTY, Tam PPL: A correlation of the outcome of clinical in vitro fertilization with the inositol content and embryotrophic properties of human serum. J Assist Reprod Genet 1992;9:524–530

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Laufer N, DeCherney AH, Tarlatzis BC, Zuckerman AL, et al.: Delaying human chorionic gonadotropin administration in human menopausal gonadotropin-induced cycles decreases successful in vitro fertilization of human oocytes. Fertil Steril 1984;42:198–203

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Clark L, Stanger J, Brinsmead M: Prolonged follicle stimulation decreases pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1991;55:1192–1194

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Catherino WH, Leondires M, McKeeby J, Cruess D, Segars JH, et al.: Prolonged ovarian stimulation in ART cycles does not improve clinical pregnancy rates in poor responders. Fertil Steril 2002;78:S49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dimitry ES, Bates SA, Oskarsson T, Margara R, Winston RML: Programming in vitro fertilization for a 5- or 3-day week. Fertil Steril 1991;55:934–938

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dimitry ES, Oskarsson T, Conaghan J, Margara R, Winston RML: Beneficial effects of a 24-h delay in human chorionic gonadotropin administration during in vitro fertilization treatment cycles. Hum Reprod 1991;6:944–946

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tan SL, Balen A, Hussein E, Mills C, Campbell S, Yovich J, et al.: A prospective randomized study of the optimum timing of human chorionic gonadotropin administration after pituitary desensitization in in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 1992;57:1259–1264

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, van Steirteghem AC: Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermtozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340:17–18

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ben-Rafael Z, Koof GS, Blasco L, Flickinger GL, et al.: Follicular maturation parameters associated with the failure of oocyte retrieval, fertilization, and cleavage in vitro. Fertil Steril 1986;45:51–57

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Battaglia C, Regnani G, Petraglia F, Genazzani AR, Artini PG, Volpe A: The use of a starting dose of recombinant follicle stimulating hormone for controlled ovarian hyperstimulation: A randomized pilot study. Gynecol Endocrinol 2000;14:311–315

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Jones HW Jr, Acosta AA, Andrews MC, Garcia JE, Jones GS, Mayer J, et al.: Three years of in vitro fertilization at Norfork. Fertil Steril 1984;42:826–834

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Crozet N, Kanka J, Motlik, et al.: Nucleolar fine structure and RNA synthesis in bovine oocytes from antral follicles. Gamete Res 1986;14:65–74

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sirard MA, Florman HM, Liebfried-Rutledge ML, et al.: Timing of nuclear progression and protein synthesis necessary for meiotic maturation of bovine oocytes. Biol Reprod 1989;40:1257–1263

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eppig JJ, Schultz RM, O'Brien M, et al.: Relationship between the developmental programs controlling nuclear and cytoplasmic maturation of mouse oocytes. Dev Biol 1994;164:1–9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Ivani KA, Weckstein LN, Walker DM: Effect of length of stimulation in ART cycles on pregnancy rate. Fertil Steril 2003;80:181–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Borm G, Mannaerts B: Treatment with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist ganirelix in women undergoing ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle stimulating hormone is effective, safe, and convenient: Results of a controlled, randomized, multicentre trial. The European Orgalutran Study Group. Hum Reprod 2000;15:1490–1498

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fluker M, Grifo J, Leader A, Levy M, Meldrum D, Muasher SJ, et al.: Efficacy and safety of ganirelix acetate versus leuprolide acetate in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation. Fertil Steril 2001;75:38–45

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Kolibianakis E, Bourgain C, Albano C, Osmanagaoglu K, Smitz J, van Steirteghem A, et al.: Effect of ovarian stimulation with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone, gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists, and human chorionic gonadotropin on endometrial maturation on the day of oocyte pick-up. Fertil Steril 2002;78:1025–1029

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kolibianakis EM, Albano C, Kahn J, Camus M, Tournaye H, van Steriteghem AC, et al.: Exposure to high levels of luteinizing hormone and estradiol in the early follicular phase of gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist cycles is associated with a reduced chance of pregnancy. Fertil Steril 2003;79:873–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Garcia-Velasco JA, Isaza V, Vidal C, Landazabal A, Remohi J, Simon C, et al.: Human ovarian steroid secretion in vivo: Effects of GnRH agonist versus antagonist (cetrorelix). Hum Reprod 2001;16:2533–2539

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Morgan PM, Warikoo PK, Bavister BD: In vitro maturation of ovarian oocytes from unstimulated rhesus monkeys: Assessment of cytoplasmic maturity by embryonic development after in vitro fertilization. Biol Reprod 1991;45:89–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Conceptia Reproductive Clinic, Beausejour Medical Research Institute, Georges-L.-Dumont Hospital, Moncton, Canada

    Tao Tao, Alfred Robichaud, Sylvie Nadeau, Rejean Savoie, Bernard Gallant & Rodney J. Ouellette

  2. Institut de Recherche Médicale Beauséjour, Pavillon Hôtel Dieu, 35 Rue Providence St, Moncton, New Brunswick, E1C 8X3, Canada

    Rodney J. Ouellette

Authors
  1. Tao Tao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Alfred Robichaud
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Sylvie Nadeau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Rejean Savoie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Bernard Gallant
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Rodney J. Ouellette
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rodney J. Ouellette.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tao, T., Robichaud, A., Nadeau, S. et al. Optimized Hormonal Stimulation Is Critical for Production of Viable Embryos and Establishment of Subsequent Implantation. J Assist Reprod Genet 23, 23–28 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-9005-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-9005-1

KEY WORDS:

Search

Navigation