Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The “Spanning Protocol”: A new DNA extraction method for efficient single-cell genetic diagnosis

  • Genetics
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose: We evaluated methods of preparation of DNA from single cells for amplification and preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD), including our “spanning protocol.”

Methods: Dystrophin gene exons 45 and 51 were amplified by nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) from a single lymphocyte or blastomere. Amplification efficiencies were compared between DNA extraction by (A) lysis in distilled water with freeze-thawing and boiling; (B) two-step lysis involving potassium hydroxide and dithiothreitol; and (C) the spanning protocol, using N-lauroylsarcosine.

Results: With method A, amplification efficiency was 66/120 (55%) and false-positive such as amplification failure or allele drop out was 42/120 (35%); with B, 96/120 (80%) and 21/120 (17.5%); and with C, 111/120 (92%) and 5/120 (4.2%), using single blastomeres and unaffected lymphocytes from male. Occurrence of false-negative such as contamination of another DNA with method A was 4/120 (3.3%); with B, 10/120 (8.3%); and with C, 2/120 (1.7%) from using single lymphocytes from affected males.

Conclusion: The spanning protocol was most efficient for extracting DNA from a single cell and should be particularly useful for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hardy K, Winston RM, Handyside AH, et al.: Biopsy of cleavage-stage human embryos and diagnosis of single-gene defects by DNA amplification. Arch Pathol Lab Med 1992;116:388–392

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Verlinsky Y, Kuliev AM: Preimplantation diagnosis of genetic disease: A new technique in assisted reproduction. New York, Wiley-Liss, 1993

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kontogianni EH, Griffin DK, Handyside AH: Identifying the sex of human preimplantation embryos in X-linked disease: Amplification efficiency of Y-specific alphoid repeat from single blastomeres with two lysis protocols. J Assist Reprod Genet 1996;13:125–132

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hardy K, Martin KL, Leese HJ, et al.: Human preimplatation development in vitro is not adversely affected by biopsy at the 8-cell stage. Hum Reprod 1990;5:708–714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Verlinsky Y, Handyside A, Grifo J, et al.: Preimplantation diagnosis of genetic and chromosomal disorders. J Assist Reprod Genet 1993;11:236–243

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hashiba T, Sueoka K, Kuroshima H, et al.: An accurate and rapid gender determination assay in single cells by the capillary polymerase chain reaction method. J Assist Reprod Genet 1999;16:551–554

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Hashiba T, Sueoka K, Kuroshima H, et al.: Accurate multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay for gender determination from a single cell. Gynecol Obstet Invest 2000;49:217–220

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH: DNA amplification of Y-specific sequences for sexing preimplantation human embryos. In Preimplantation genetics, Y Verlinsky, C Strom (eds), New York, Plenum Press, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kontogianni EH, Hardy K, Handyside AH: Co-amplification of X- and Y-specific sequences for sexing preimplantation human embryos. In Preimplantation genetics, Y Verlinsky, C Strom (eds), New York, Plenum Press, 1991

    Google Scholar 

  10. Handyside AH, Kontogianni EH, Handy K, et al.: Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification. Nature 1990;344:768–770

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Grifo JA, Tang YX, Munne S, et al.: Healthy deliveries from biopsied human embryos. Hum Reprod 1994;9:912–916

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Griffin DK, Wilton LJ, Handyside AH, et al.: Dual fluorescent in situ hybridisation for simultaneous detection of X and Y chromosome specific probes for the sexing of human preimplantation embryonic nuclei. Hum Genet 1992;89:18–22

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Griffin DK, Wilton LJ, Handyside AH, et al.: Diagnosis of sex in preimplantation embryos by fluorescent in situ hybridisation. BMJ 1993;306:1382

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hardy K, Winston RML, Handyside AH: Binucleate blastomeres in human preimplantation embryos in vitro: Failure of cytokinesis during early cleavage. J Reprod Fertil 1993;98:549–558

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Grifo JA, Tang YX, Cohen J, et al.: Pregnancy after embryo biopsy and coamplification of DNA from X and Y chromosomes. JAMA 1992;268:727–729

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Handyside AH, Harper J, Winston RML: Preliminary evaluation of the use of in vitro fertilization for preimplantation diagnosis of inherited disease. J Reprod Fertil Abstr Ser 1992;10:53

    Google Scholar 

  17. Girardet A, Catha P, Clavstres M: Montpellier: Rapid detection of the F508 mutation in single cells using DHPLC: Implications for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. J Assist Reprod Genet 2003;20:153–156

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shinichi Tsuchiya.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsuchiya, S., Sueoka, K., Matsuda, N. et al. The “Spanning Protocol”: A new DNA extraction method for efficient single-cell genetic diagnosis. J Assist Reprod Genet 22, 407–414 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-7482-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-005-7482-x

Keywords

Navigation