The interactions between Chlorella vulgaris and algal symbiotic bacteria under photoautotrophic and photoheterotrophic conditions
- 1.6k Downloads
A Chlorella vulgaris ATCC 13482 culture was semi-continuously cultivated for 18 months in a 4-L photobioreactor and formed associated consortia with other symbionts. Three symbiotic bacterial strains were isolated on heterotrophic medium agar plates. Based on 16S rDNA analysis, they were found to show closest similarity to Pseudomonas alcaligenes, Elizabethkingia miricola and Methylobacterium radiotolerans. C. vulgaris was co-cultured with each bacterial strain, and it was found that the symbiotic bacterium Pseudomonas sp. had a growth-promoting effect on C. vulgaris while the other two inhibited algal growth. The interactions between C. vulgaris and Pseudomonas sp. were further investigated under different cultivation conditions. The co-culture resulted in 1.4 times greater algal cell concentration than that of C. vulgaris alone under photoautotrophic condition. In contrast, the algal cell concentration was lower in the co-culture compared with single algal culture when glucose was supplied in the medium (photoheterotrophic). Under both cultivation conditions, the number of Pseudomonas sp. increased at the beginning of experiment, and then decreased. However, the bacterial number decreased to almost zero under photoheterotrophic conditions, while the growth of bacteria went into a stationary phase under photoautotrophic conditions. The chlorophyll content in C. vulgaris cell was higher in co-culture than in single algal culture. Algal cells in photoautotrophic condition showed higher photosynthetic efficiency compared to those in photoheterotrophic condition. Extracellular organic carbon dissolved in the medium continuously increased under photoautotrophic condition. The mutualistic and competing relationships between C. vulgaris and symbiotic bacteria observed in this study could aid our understanding of algae–bacteria interactions in nature as well as broadening its practical applications.
KeywordsMicroalgae Chlorella vulgaris Symbiotic bacteria Interactions
We acknowledge the funding support under the grant number R302000011112 and the research scholarship for Mr. Zhi Guo from the National University of Singapore. This research is also supported by the National Research Foundation Singapore under its CREATE Programme (Singapore–Peking University Research Centre for a Sustainable Low Carbon Future).
- Cosgrove J, Borowitzka MA (2011) Chlorophyll fluorescence terminology: an introduction. In: Suggett DJ, Prášil O, Borowitzka MA (eds) Chlorophyll a fluorescence in aquatic sciences. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–17Google Scholar
- Czerpak R, Krotke A, Mical A (1999) Comparison of stimulatory effect of auxins and cytokinins on protein, saccharides and chlorophylls content in Chlorella pyrenoidosa Chick. Pol Arch Hydrobiol 46:71–82Google Scholar
- de-Bashan LE, Moreno M, Hernandez JP, Bashan Y (2002) Removal of ammonium and phosphorus ions from synthetic wastewater by the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris coimmobilized in alginate beads with the microalgae growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. Water Res 36:2941–2948PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Guillard RRL (2005) Purification methods for microalgae. In: Andersen RA (ed) Algal culturing techniques. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, pp 117–132Google Scholar
- Imai I, Ishida Y, Sakaguchi K, Hata Y (1995) Algicidal marine-bacteria isolated from northern Hiroshima bay, Japan. Fisheries Sci 61:628–636Google Scholar
- Lee YK, Shen H (2004) Basic culturing techniques. In: Richmond A (ed) Handbook of microalgal culture: biotechnology and applied phycology. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, pp 40–56Google Scholar
- Paerl HW (1976) Specific associations of blue-green algae Anabaena and Aphanizomenon with bacteria in freshwater blooms. J Phycol 12:431–435Google Scholar
- Suminto, Hirayama K (1997) Application of a growth-promoting bacteria for stable mass culture of three marine microalgae. Hydrobiologia 358:223–230Google Scholar