A comparative study of the coagulation behaviour of marine microalgae
Coagulation is an important step in the harvesting of algal biomass. This paper presents experimental results for a variety of prospective marine microalgal species using several inorganic and organic coagulants. Tetraselmis suecica and Chlorococcum sp. are readily coagulated using alum or iron(III) sulphate without any pH adjustment; doses of 3–5 mg L−1 or 0.2 mmol m−2 of Al3+ or Fe3+ yielding cell recoveries above 90 % after only 5-min settling. Nannochloropsis salina, Dunaliella tertiolecta and Isochrysis galbana are harder to coagulate and require at least two times more coagulant to achieve similar recoveries. Several cationic polyacrylamides were investigated but were less effective than Al3+ or Fe3+. Addition of NaOH to control pH improved the coagulation efficiency of N. salina but not of D. tertiolecta. The high coagulant demand of N. salina is due in part to its small size and large surface area, while that of D. tertiolecta may be attributable to its high production of extracellular polymer. The implications of cell surface properties for coagulation efficiency are discussed. At the coagulant doses used herein, settled cells remain viable. Resuspension is a potential problem with some species, arising either from cell motility or from flotation of flocs by oxygen bubbles generated by photosynthesis. These effects can be eliminated by small additions of chlorine or by settling the algae in the dark.
KeywordsMicroalgae Dewatering Harvesting Coagulation Flocculation Biofuels
This work was funded by an ARC linkage grant with financial support from Biofuels Pty Ltd. We thank Tina Hines and Kerrie Browne at Water Studies Centre for DOC and Fe analyses. Al analyses were performed by ALS Laboratory Group, Springvale, Victoria, Australia. The authors also thank Sherrie Caarels for her monitoring work and maintenance of the algal cultures.
- Bernhardt H, Clasen J (1991) Flocculation of micro-organisms. J Water Supply Res Technol 40(2):76–87Google Scholar
- Bhaskar PV, Bhosle NB (2005) Microbial extracellular polymeric substances in marine biogeochemical processes. Curr Sci India 88:45–53Google Scholar
- Gelin F, Boogers L, Noordeloos AAM, Sinninghe Damsté JS, Riegman R, De Leeuw JW (1996) Resistant biomacromolecules in marine microalgae of the classes Eustigmatophyceae and Chlorophyceae: geochemical implications. Org Ceochem 26:659–675Google Scholar
- Hunter RJ (2001) Foundations of colloid science. Oxford University Press, New York, p 616Google Scholar
- Huntsman SA (1972) Organic excretion by Dunaliella tertiolecta. J Phycol 8:59–63Google Scholar
- Kormas KA (2005) Bacterioplankton growth on extracellular organic carbon from marine microalgal cultures. Biol Mar 46:241–251Google Scholar
- McGarry M (1970) Algal flocculation with aluminum sulfate and polyelectrolytes. Res J Water Pollut C 42:191–201Google Scholar
- Pieterse AJH, Cloot A (1997) Algal cells and coagulation, flocculation and sedimentation processes. Water Sci Technol 36:111–118Google Scholar
- Plummer JD, Edzwald JK (2002) Effects of chlorine and ozone on algal cell properties and removal of algae by coagulation. J Water Supply Res Technol 51:307–318Google Scholar
- Tenney M, Echelberger W, Schuessler R, Pavoni J (1969) Algal flocculation with synthetic organic polyelectrolytes. Appl Environ Microbiol 18:965–971Google Scholar
- Wijffels RH, Barbosa MJ (2010) An outlook on microalgal biofuels. Science 329:796Google Scholar