Beyond Castration and Culling: Should We Use Non-surgical, Pharmacological Methods to Control the Sexual Behavior and Reproduction of Animals?
- 20 Downloads
This paper explores ethical issues raised by the application of non-surgical, pharmaceutical fertility control to manage reproductive behaviors in domesticated and wild animal species. We focus on methods that interfere with the effects of GnRH, making animals infertile and significantly suppressing sexual behavior in both sexes. The paper is anchored by considering ethical issues raised by four diverse cases: the use of pharmaceutical fertility control in (a) male slaughter pigs, (b) domesticated stallions and mares, (c) male companion dogs and (d) female white-tailed deer. Ethical concerns explored include animals’ welfare, the possible violation of animals’ rights, including rights to life, reproduction and bodily integrity; and potential concerns about loss of wildness. We compare ethical concerns about pharmaceutical fertility control with alternative strategies for managing animals’ reproductive behavior including (where appropriate) spaying and neutering, sex separation, sex sorting, culling, and doing nothing. The paper concludes that there are some cases where pharmaceutical fertility control is the best ethical choice in current circumstances; but that there are other cases where alternative choices, including doing nothing, would be ethically preferable. This suggests that in ethical terms a case-by-case approach should be taken to the use of pharmaceutical fertility control in animals.
KeywordsAnimal ethics Animal welfare Animal rights Animal fertility control Animal contraception Spaying and neutering
We are grateful to the participants of the Second Annual Bovay Workshop on Engineering and Applied Ethics, especially Bernice Bovenkerk and Josh Milburn, for comments on this paper. We also want to thank Joyce Briggs and Valerie Benka from the Alliance for Contraception in Cats and Dogs, and the referees for this journal, for their comments and suggestions. Finally we would like to thank Sara V. Kondrup for help with reviewing literature and references.
- Appleby, M. C., & Sandøe, P. (2002). Philosophical debate on the nature of well-being: Implications for animal welfare. Animal Welfare, 11(3), 283–294.Google Scholar
- Boonin, D. (2003). Robbing PETA to Spay Paul: Do animal rights include reproductive rights? Between the Species, 13(3), 1–8.Google Scholar
- Clutton-Brock, J. (1992). How the wild beasts were tamed. New Scientist, 133(1808), 31–33.Google Scholar
- Cochrane, A. (2012). Animal rights without liberation: Applied ethics and human obligations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Cooley, D. M., Beranek, B. C., Schlittler, D. L., Glickman, N. W., Glickman, L. T., & Waters, D. J. (2002). Endogenous gonadal hormone exposure and bone sarcoma risk. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers and Prevention, 11(11), 1434–1440.Google Scholar
- Ditchkoff, S. S., Welch, E. R., Jr., Lochmiller, R. L., Masters, R. E., Starry, W. R., & Dinkines, W. C. (1998). Wounding rates of white-tailed deer with traditional archery equipment. Proceedings of the Annual Conference of the Southeastern Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies, 52, 244–248.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, S., & Kymlicka, W. (2011). Zoopolis: Towards a political theory of animal rights. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Donaldson, S., Kymlicka, W., & Taylor, A. (2014). An interview with Sue Donaldson and Will Kymlicka. Between the Species, 17(1), 140–165.Google Scholar
- European Commission. (2017). Alternatives to pig castration. European declaration on alternatives to surgical castration of pigs. https://ec.europa.eu/food/animals/welfare/practice/farm/pigs/castration_alternatives_en. Accessed May 30, 2017.
- Evans, J. M., & Sutton, D. J. (1989). The use of hormones, especially progestagens, to control oestrus in bitches. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility (United Kingdom), 39, 163–173.Google Scholar
- Francione, G. L., & Charlton, A. E. (2016). The case against pets. Resource document. Aeon. https://aeon.co/essays/why-keeping-a-pet-is-fundamentally-unethical. Accessed May 30, 2017.
- Gong, J. G., Campbell, B. K., Bramley, T. A., Gutierrez, C. G., Peters, A. R., & Webb, R. (1996). Suppression in the secretion of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone, and ovarian follicle development in heifers continuously infused with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist. Biology of Reproduction, 55(1), 68–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Humane Society International. (2017). Street animal welfare. http://www.hsi.org/issues/street_dog/factsheets/street_animal_welfare.html. Accessed May 30, 2017.
- Jackman, J., & Rowan, A. (2007). Free-roaming dogs in developing countries: The benefits of capture, neuter, and return programs. In D. J. Salem & A. N. Rowan (Eds.), The state of the animals 2007 (pp. 55–78). Washington, DC: Humane Society Press.Google Scholar
- Kirkpatrick, J. (1999). Urban deer contraception: The seven stages of grief. In P. Cohn (Ed.), Ethics and wildlife (pp. 205–208). New York: The Edwin Mellen Press.Google Scholar
- Kirkpatrick, J., & Turner, J. (1991). Reversible contraception in non-domestic animals. Journal of Zoo and Wildife Medicine, 22(4), 392–408.Google Scholar
- Lund, E. M., Armstrong, P. J., Kirk, C. A., & Klausner, J. S. (2006). Prevalence and risk factors for obesity in adult dogs from private US veterinary practices. International Journal of Applied Veterinary Medicine, 4(2), 3–5.Google Scholar
- Misdorp, W., Romijn, A., & Hart, A. A. (1990). Feline mammary tumors: A case-control study of hormonal factors. Anticancer Research, 11(5), 1793–1797.Google Scholar
- Nussbaum, M. (1999). Sex and social justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Regan, T. (1983). The case for animal rights. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
- Sandøe, P., Corr, S., & Palmer, C. (2016). Companion animal ethics. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Schneider, R., Dorn, C. R., & Taylor, D. O. N. (1969). Factors influencing canine mammary cancer development and postsurgical survival. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 43(6), 1249–1261.Google Scholar
- Webel, S. K., & Squires, E. L. (1982). Control of the oestrous cycle in mares with altrenogest. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility. Supplement, 32, 193–198.Google Scholar
- White Buffalo. (n.d.). Deer management techniques. Surgical sterilization. Resource document. http://docs.wixstatic.com/ugd/7d2503_02cd71aab82c4014b2917b5e06c121a6.pdf. Accessed May 30, 2017.