Who Cares about Farmed Fish? Citizen Perceptions of the Welfare and the Mental Abilities of Fish
- 547 Downloads
This paper explores citizens’ views about the welfare of farmed fish and the mental abilities of fish with a large survey data sample from Finland (n = 1,890). Although studies on attitudes towards animal welfare have been increasing, fish welfare has received only limited empirical attention, despite the rapid expansion of aquaculture sector. The results show that the welfare of farmed fish is not any great concern in the Finnish society. The analysis confirms the distinct character given to farmed fish compared to traditional farmed animals. Salmon are rated low in their mental abilities, including the capacity to feel pain, which may weaken ethical concerns for fish welfare. When analyzing the social determinants surrounding the rating of the welfare of farmed fish, it was shown that fish welfare attitudes follow general animal welfare attitudes regarding age and place of residence as fish welfare tends to be rated more negatively among younger age groups and among urban residents. However, no clear connection could be identified between gender and the rating of fish welfare, which may suggest that the distinct cultural categorization of fish diminishes the typical gender difference identified in animal attitudes. It is concluded that in order to improve awareness about fish welfare, there is a need to increase dissemination of scientific knowledge about fish and their welfare. Moreover, further research should be directed toward studying the moral positioning of fish and the distinct moral categorization they receive.
KeywordsAnimal attitudes Fish welfare Mental abilities of fish Farmed fish Conceptions of animals
We would like to thank two referees for their helpful comments and suggestions. We also want to thank the Academy of Finland for their financial support for the project Politicised Animals—the Consumer and Farm Animals (128122), which enabled us to gather the material for this research.
- Baruch, Y. (1999). Response rate in academic studies—a comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4), 421–438.Google Scholar
- Bergqvist, J., Gunnarsson, S. (2011). Finfish aquaculture: Animal welfare, the environment, and ethical implications. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. doi: 10.1007/s10806-011-9346-y.
- Bshary, R., Wickler, W., & Fricke, H. (2002). Fish cognition: A primate’s eye view. Animal Cognition, 5(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
- Cottee, S. (2010). Are fish the victims of ‘speciesism’? A discussion about fear, pain and animal consciousness. Fish Physiology and Biochemistry. doi 10.1007/s10695-010-9449-59.
- EC European Commission (2007) Attitudes of consumers towards the welfare of farmed animals. http://ec.europa.eu/food/animal/welfare/survey/sp_barometer_fa_en.pdf. Accessed 10 November 2011.
- EFSA. (2009). Scientific opinion of the panel on animal health and welfare on a request from European Commission on general approach to fish welfare and to the concept of sentience in fish. The EFSA Journal 954, 1–26.Google Scholar
- FAO. (2010). The state of world fisheries and aquaculture. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome.Google Scholar
- FGFRI. (2009). Recreational fishing 2008. Helsinki: Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute.Google Scholar
- FGFRI. (2010). Finnish fisheries statistics. Helsinki: Finnish Game and Fisheries Research Institute.Google Scholar
- Fiddes, N. (1991). Meat: A natural symbol. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Franklin, A. (1999). Animals and modern cultures: A sociology of human-animal relations in modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fraser, D. (2008). Understanding animal welfare. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Herzog, H., & Galvin, S. (1997). Common sense and the mental lives of animals: An empirical approach. In R. Mitchell, N. Thompson, & N. L. Miles (Eds.), Anthropomorhism, anecdotes, and animals (pp. 237–253). Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
- Kjaernes, U. (2011). Ethics and action: A relational perspective on consumer choice in the European politics of food. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics. doi 10.1007/s10806-011-9315-5.
- Knight, S., Vrij, A., Bard, K. & Brandon, D. (2009). Science versus human welfare? Understanding attitudes toward animal use. Journal of Social Issues 65(3), 463–483.Google Scholar
- Lauenstein, V., & Olie, F. (2010). Fish welfare in aquaculture—slipping off the agenda? In H. Lelieveldt (Ed.), What’s on the Menu? A comparative analysis of the agenda-setting dynamics of sustainable meat, fish in four European countries (pp. 85–104). Middelburg: Roosevelt Academy.Google Scholar
- Martelli, G. (2009). Consumers’ perception of farm animal welfare: An Italian and European Perspective. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 8, 31–41.Google Scholar
- Miele, M., Veissier, I., Evans, A., & Botreau, R. (2011). Animal welfare: Establishing a dialogue between science and society. Animal Welfare, 20(1), 103–117.Google Scholar
- Miura, A., Bradshawtt, J., & Tanidat, H. (2002). Childhood experiences and attitudes towards animal issues: A comparison of young adults in Japan and the UK. Animal Welfare, 11(4), 437–448.Google Scholar
- Paul, E., & Serpell, J. (1993). Childhood pet keeping and humane attitudes in young adulthood. Animal Welfare, 2(4), 321–337.Google Scholar
- Salmi, P., & Ratamäki, O. (2011). Fishing culture, animal policy, and new governance: A case study of voluntary catch-and-release fishing in Finland. In T. Beard, R. Arlinghaus, & S. G. Sutton (Eds.), The angler in the environment social, economic, biological, and ethical dimensions (pp. 235–249). Maryland: American Fisheries Society.Google Scholar
- Thomas, K. (1983). Man and the natural world: Changing attitudes in England (pp. 1500–1800). London: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Vanhonacker, F., Verbeke, W., van Poucke, E., & Tuyttens, F. (2007). Segmentation based on consumers’ perceived importance and attitude toward farm animal welfare. International Journal of Sociology of Food and Agriculture, 15(3), 91–107.Google Scholar
- Vialles, N. (1987/1994). Animal to edible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original French publication 1987).Google Scholar