Severity of Types of Violations of Research Ethics: Perception of Iranian Master’s Students of Translation
- 200 Downloads
Violations of research ethics including a varieties of plagiarism by students in Iran is a concern which has lately called promising levels of attention as rules are updated and better enforced and more awareness is being raised. As to deal with any problem, a full understanding of its nature is necessary, the current study focused on how a sample of Iranian students construe this phenomenon. To collect the necessary data, an original questionnaire with 34 closed-ended items included the most common instances of violations of research ethics was designed. The items included were mainly varieties of plagiarism identified in the literature. The items were narrowed down with reference to the qualitative data from focus group interviews with a purposive sample of Iranian graduate students. In the main phase of the study, using the questionnaire, quantitative data were obtained from the responses of 274 graduate students of translation studying in various Iranian universities. The findings revealed the participants did not have a fully accurate perception and appreciation of research ethics violation as they failed to distinguish ethically acceptable from unethical conducts. The contributing sample showed indifference to most ethical issues in scholarly publication. Translating a text and presenting it as one’s own in addition to text recycling were identified as the most severe instances perceived. The types, fraudulence, unacknowledged use, duplicate publication, misreferencing, excessive overuse were perceived the most severe to the least severe according to the sample. The typology and the findings on the severity of the types and instances were recommended to be used as an empirically supported guideline for curriculum design of academic writing courses in graduate programs in Iranian universities or similar contexts.
KeywordsViolations of research ethics Plagiarism Types Perception Translation students
The authors are sincerely grateful for the constructive and insightful recommendations of the editor and the anonymous reviewers on the earlier draft of the manuscript.
We also thankfully acknowledge that the current study was supported by a grant-in-aid of research (No. 39116) from Ferdowsi University of Mashhad.
- Adam, L., Anderson, V., & Spronken-Smith, R. (2016). ‘It’s not fair’: policy discourses and students’ understandings of plagiarism in a New Zealand university. Higher Education, 1–16. doi: 10.1007/s10734-016-0025-9.
- Bamford, J., & Sergiou, K. (2005). International students and plagiarism: An analysis of the reasons for plagiarism among international foundation students. Investigations in University Teaching and Learning, 2(2), 17–22.Google Scholar
- Bizhani, M. (2006). ایران و دورنمای پیوستن به قانون کپیرایت [Iran and the prospect of adhering to copyright law]. Journal of Political Economy, 215-216, 204–221.Google Scholar
- Brandt, D. S. (2002). Techman’s techpage: Copyright’s (not so) little cousin, plagiarism. Computers in Libraries, 22(5), 39–41.Google Scholar
- Cattell, R. B. (1996). The Scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2), 245–276. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
- Doró, K. (2014). Why do students plagiarize? EFL undergraduates’ views on the reasons behind plagiarism. Romanian Journal of English Studie, 11(1), 255–263.Google Scholar
- Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Howard, R. M. (2002). Don’t police plagiarism: Just teach! Education Digest, 67(5), 46–49.Google Scholar
- Hrasky, S., & Kronenburg, D. (2011). Curriculum redesign as a faculty-centred approach to plagiarism reduction. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 7(2), 23–36.Google Scholar
- Jafari Sani, H., & Ferasat, M. (2013). بررسی علل سرقت علمی سایبری در دانشجویان پرستاری دانشگاه علوم پزشکی مشهد [ A study on the reasons behind cyber plagiarism among nursing students in Mashhad University of Medical Sciences] paper presented in the first international congress and the sixth National Conference on E-learning in medical sciences, shiraz, Iran.Google Scholar
- Khoshsaligheh, M., Keyvan, S., & Mehdizadkhani, M. (2015). دلایل سرقت علمی توسط دانشجویان تحصیلات تکمیلی رشتههای زبانهای خارجی [reasons of committing plagiarism by graduate students of foreign languages]. In M. Khoshsaligheh (Ed.), Selected papers of 2nd conference on interdisciplinary approaches to language teaching, literature and translation studies (pp. 210–220). Tehran: Khatehsefid.Google Scholar
- Kokkinaki, A. I., Demoliou, C., & Iakovidou, M. (2015). Students’ perceptions of plagiarism and relevant policies in Cyprus. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 11(3), 1–11.Google Scholar
- Lefevere, A. (1992). Translation, rewriting, and the manipulation of literary fame. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Marshall, S., & Garry, M. (2006). NESB and ESB students’ attitudes and perceptions of plagiarism. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 2(1), 26–37.Google Scholar
- Maurer, H. A., Kappa, F., & Zaka, B. (2006). Plagiarism -A survey. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 12(8), 1050–1084.Google Scholar
- Ministry of Science Research and Technology. (2015).دستورالعمل نحوه بررسي تخلفات پژوهشي و مصاديق تخلفات پژوهشي [Regulations for Investigating Violations of Research Ethics and Enumeration of Instances]. Retrieved [August 30, 2015] from http://www.msrt.ir/fa/rppc/pages/files/research.aspx
- Moore, E. (2014). Accuracy of referencing and patterns of plagiarism in electronically published theses. International Journal for Educational Integrity, 10(1), 42–55.Google Scholar
- Ojaqi, R., Keyvanara, M., Cheshmeh Sohrabi, M., & Papi, A. (2012). تحليل آسيب شناسي تقلب و سرقت علمي: بر اساس يك تحقيق كيفي [critical analysis of plagiarism: A qualitative research]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 11(9), 1063–1073.Google Scholar
- Pallant, J. (2016). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (6th ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
- Riasati, M. J., & Rahimi, F. (2013). Why do Iranian postgraduate students plagiarize? A qualitative investigation. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 14(3), 309–317.Google Scholar
- Roig, M. (2006). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. Available from: http://facpub.stjohns.edu/~roigm/plagiarism/Index.html
- Scanlon, P. M., & Neumann, D. R. (2002). Internet plagiarism among college students. Journal of College Student Development, 43(3), 374–385.Google Scholar
- Stepchyshyn, V., & Nelson, R. S. (2007). Library plagiarism policies. Chicago: Association of College & Research Library.Google Scholar
- Trasberg, K., & Ligi, M. (2014). University students’ reasons for committing academic fraud and knowledge about regulations: A qualitative interview study. Educational Studies Moscow, 4, 184–208.Google Scholar
- Wilkinson, J. (2009). Staff and student perceptions of plagiarism and cheating. International Journal of Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, 20(2), 98–105.Google Scholar
- Wood, M. J., & Ross-Kerr, J. (2006). Basic steps in planning nursing research: From question to proposal (6th ed.). Sudbuery: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
- Zamani, B. E., Azimi, S. A., & Soleymani, N. (2012). مقایسه عوامل موثر بر سرقت علمی بر حسب جنسیت و رشته تحصیلی از دیدگاه دانشجویان [differences in students’ viewpoints about effective factors on plagiarism according to their gender and academic discipline]. Ethics in Science & Technology, 7(3), 24–36.Google Scholar
- Zamani, B. E., Azimi, S. A., & Soleymani, N. (2013). علمی دانشجویان دانشگاه اصفهان شناسایی و اولویت بندي عوامل مؤثر بر سرقت [identifying and prioritizing the effective factors affecting the students’ plagiarism in Isfahan University]. Research and Planning in Higher Education, 19(1), 91–110.Google Scholar