Journal of Academic Ethics

, Volume 7, Issue 4, pp 277–285 | Cite as

Students’ Ethical Behavior in Iran



Most of research on fostering ethical behavior among students has taken place in US and Europe. This paper seeks to provide additional information to both educators and organizations about the ethical perceptions of Iranian students by investigating the effect of gender on students’ ethical behavior. The authors developed and administered a quantitative questionnaire to a sample of 203 individuals currently pursuing accredited degrees at one of the public universities in Iran. Statistical analysis revealed that male students have a significantly less ethical behavior in three factors (selfishness, academic cheating and computer ethics) than female students. While the topic of students’ ethical behavior and its relationship with gender has been extensively studied before, there have been contrasting findings by different researchers. This paper is among the very few first researches conducted among Iranian university students to investigate the effects of gender on students’ ethical behavior under the four categories of violation of school regulations, selfishness, academic cheating, and computer ethics, hence making an important contribution to the ethics literature on the developing countries, since the study was conducted in Iran.


Ethical behavior Students’ ethical behavior University students Iran 



The first author, Mr. Mehran Nejati, would like to thank Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) for its support by providing financial support through Vice-Chancellor Award which made this research possible. Also, the third author, Mr. Mostafa Nejati would like to acknowledge Universiti Sains Malaysia (USM) for supporting toward the publication of this paper through USM Fellowship.


  1. AccessMyLibrary, (2004). An honest look at cheating: engineering students are likely to do it. Industrial Engineer. Retrieved August 08, 2009, from
  2. Albaum, G., & Peterson, R. A. (2006). Ethical attitudes of future business leaders: do they vary by gender and religiosity? Business & Society, 45(3), 300–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ameen, E. C., Guffey, D. M., & McMillan, J. J. (1996). Accounting students’ perceptions of questionable academic practices and factors affecting their propensity to cheat. Accounting Education, 5(3), 191–205.Google Scholar
  4. Arlow, P. (1991). Personal characteristics in college students’ evaluations of business ethics and corporate responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baack, D., Fogliasso, C., & Harris, J. (2000). The personal impact of ethical decisions: a social penetration theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(1), 39–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Beltramini, P., Peterson, R., & Kozmetsky, G. (1984). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 3(3), 195–200.Google Scholar
  7. Bernardi, R. A., Giuliano, J. L., Komatsu, E., Potter, B. M., & Yamamoto, S. (2004a). Contrasting the cheating behaviors of college students from the United States and Japan. Global Virtue Ethics Review, 5(4), 5–31.Google Scholar
  8. Bernardi, R. A., Metzger, R. L., Scofield Bruno, R. G., Wade Hoogkamp, M. A., Reyes, L. E., & Barnaby, G. H. (2004b). Examining the decision process of students’ cheating behavior: an empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 50(4), 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Betz, M., O’Connell, L., & Shepard, J. M. (1989). Gender differences in productivity for unethical behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 8(5), 321–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boisvert, R. F., & Irwin, M. J. (2006). Plagiarism on the rise. Communications of the ACM, 49(6), 23–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, Y. J. (1992). The ethical attitudes of students as a function of age, sex, and experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 11(12), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Borkowski, S. C., & Ugras, Y. J. (1998). Business students and ethics: a meta-analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 17(11), 1117–1127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boyd, D. P. (1981). Improving ethical awareness through the business and society course. Business and Society, 20(2), 27–31.Google Scholar
  14. Browning, J., & Zabriskie, N. B. (1983). How ethical are industrial buyers? Industrial Marketing Management, 12, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burnett, M., Keith, K., & Pettijohn, C. (2003). An empirical analysis of factors influencing student reactions to ethical advertising dilemmas: educational experience, work experience, ethical philosophy and demographics. Marketing Education Review, 13(1), 33–46.Google Scholar
  16. Callahan, S. (1990). Is gender germane? Health Progress, 71, 21–24.Google Scholar
  17. Chonko, L. B., & Hunt, S. D. (1985). Ethics and marketing management: an empirical examination. Journal of Business Research, 13(4), 339–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Collins, D. (2000). The quest to improve the human condition: the first 1500 articles published in the Journal of Business Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 26(1), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Davis, S. F., Grover, C. A., Becker, A. H., & McGregor, L. N. (1992). Academic dishonesty: prevalence determinants, techniques, and punishments. Teaching of Psychology, 19(1), 16–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Derry, R. (1989). An empirical study of moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics, 8, 855–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Devonish, D., Alleyne, P. A., Cadogan-McClean, C., & Greenidge, D. (2009). An empirical study of future professionals’ intentions to engage in unethical business practices. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(3), 159–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Dubinsky, A. J., & Levy, M. (1985). Ethics in retailing perceptions of retail salespeople. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 13(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ekin, M. G. S., & Tezolmez, S. H. (1999). Business ethics in turkey: an empirical investigation with special emphasis on gender. Journal of Business Ethics, 18, 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ferrell, O. C., & Skinner, S. J. (1988). Ethical behavior and bureaucratic structure in marketing research organizations. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 103–109.Google Scholar
  25. Fisher, J., Fullerton, S., & Woodbine, G. (1999). Today’s ethical perspective of tomorrow’s business leaders. Irish Marketing Review, 12, 48–54.Google Scholar
  26. Frank, R. H., & Gilovich, T. (1993). Does studying economics inhibit cooperation? The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 7(2), 159–171.Google Scholar
  27. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.Google Scholar
  28. Fritzsche, D. J. (1988). An examination of marketing ethics: role of decision maker, consequences of the decision, management position, sex of the respondents. Journal of Marketing, 8(2), 29–39.Google Scholar
  29. Graham, M. A., Monday, J., O’Brien, K., & Steffen, S. (1994). Cheating at small colleges: an examination of student and faculty attitudes and behaviors. Journal of College Student Development, 35(4), 255–260.Google Scholar
  30. Harris, J. R. (1990). Ethical values of individuals at different levels in the organizational hierarchy of a single firm. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(9), 741–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hart, H. L. A. (1967). The concept of law. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
  32. Hosmer, L. T. (1999). Somebody out there doesn’t like us: a study of the position and respect of business ethics at schools of business administration. Journal of Business Ethics, 22(2), 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Jones, T. M., & Gautschi, F. H. (1988). Will the ethics of business change? A survey of future executives. Journal of Business Ethics, 7(4), 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelley, S. W., Ferrel, O. C., & Skinner, S. J. (1990). Ethical behavior among marketing researchers: an assessment of selected demographic characteristics. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(8), 681–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lane, J. C. (1995). Ethics of business students: some marketing perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 14(7), 571–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee Taylor, S. (2004). Music piracy-differences in the ethical perceptions of business majors and music business majors. Journal of Education for Business, 79(5), 306–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lozano, J. M. (2000). Ethics and organizations. London: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  38. Luthar, H. K., DiBattista, R. A., & Gautschi, T. (1997). Perception of what the ethical climate is and what it should be: the role of gender. Academic status and ethical education. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 205–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Malinowski, C., & Berger, K. A. (1996). Undergraduate student attitudes about hypothetical marketing dilemmas. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(5), 525–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mason, S. E., & Mudrack, P. E. (1996). Gender and ethical orientation: a test of gender and occupational socialization theories. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(6), 599–604.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. McCabe, D., & Trevino, L. K. (1993). Academic dishonesty: honor codes and other contextual influences. Journal of Higher Education, 64(5), 522–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. McCabe, D. L., Trevino, L. K., & Butterfield, K. D. (2001). Cheating in academic institutions: a decade of research. Ethics and Behavior, 11(3), 219–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. McCuddy, M. K., & Peery, B. L. (1996). Selected individual differences and collegians’ ethical beliefs. Journal of Business Ethics, 15(3), 261–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McMurtry, K. (2001). E-Cheating and 21st century challenges. THE Journal, 29(4), 36–41.Google Scholar
  45. Mirshekary, S., & Lawrence, A. D. K. (2009). Academic and business ethical misconduct and cultural values: a cross national comparison. Journal of Academic Ethics, 7(3), 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mitroff, I. I. (1983). Stakeholders of the organizational mind. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  47. Mudrack, P. E. (1993). An investigation into the acceptability of workplace behaviors of a dubious ethical nature. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(7), 517–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Muncy, J. A., & Vitell, S. J. (1992). Consumer ethics: an investigation of the ethical beliefs of the final consumer. Journal of Business Research, 24(3), 297–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Newstead, S. E., Franklyn-Stokes, A., & Armstead, P. (1996). Individual differences in student cheating. Journal of Education & Psychology, 88(2), 229–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Nonis, S., & Swift, C. O. (2001). An examination of the relationship between academic dishonesty and workplace dishonesty: a multicampus investigation. Journal of Education for Business, 69–76.Google Scholar
  51. Pass, S., & Willingham, W. (2009). Teaching ethics to high school students. The social studies, January/February.Google Scholar
  52. Peterson, R. A., Beltramini, R. F., & Kozmetsky, G. (1991). Concerns of college students regarding business ethics: a replication. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(10), 733–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Peterson, D. K., Rhoads, A., & Vaught, B. C. (2001). Belief in universal ethics: gender differences, influence of referent others, and ethical beliefs of business professionals. Business and Professional Ethics Journal, 20, 47–62.Google Scholar
  54. Reiss, M., & Mitra, K. (1998). The effects of individual difference factors on the acceptability of ethical and unethical workplace behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 17, 1581–1593.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Robert J. Rutland Institute for Ethics. (2004). Academic integrity initiative. CD-ROM and booklet. Clemson: Clemson University.Google Scholar
  56. Robin, D., & Babin, L. (1997). Making sense of the research on gender and ethics in business: a critical analysis and extension. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7(4), 68–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Roxas, M. L., & Stoneback, J. Y. (2004). The importance of gender across cultures in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 149–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Ruegger, D., & King, E. W. (1992). A study of the effect of age and gender upon student business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 11, 179–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ryan, L. V., & Ciavarella, M. A. (2002). Tapping the source of moral approbation: the moral referent group. Journal of Business Ethics, 38(1/2), 179–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sankaran, S., & Tung, B. (2003). Relationship between student characteristics and ethics: implications for educators. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30(3), 11–22.Google Scholar
  61. Shepard, J. M., & Hartenian, L. S. (1990). Egoistic and ethical orientations of university students toward work-related decisions. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(4), 303–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Siegfried, R. M. (2004). Student attitudes on software piracy and related issues of computer ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 6(4), 215–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Sikula, A., & Costa, A. D. (1994). Are women more ethical than men? Journal of Business Ethics, 13(11), 859–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Sims, R. L. (1993). The relationship between academic dishonesty and unethical business practices. Journal of Education for Business, 68(4), 207–212.Google Scholar
  65. Singer, P. A. (1993). A companion to ethics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  66. Singhapakdi, A., & Marta, J. K. M. (2005). Comparing marketing students with practitioners on some key variables of ethical decisions. Marketing Education Review, 15(3), 13–25.Google Scholar
  67. Smith, P. L., & Oakley, E. F., III. (1997). Gender related differences in ethical and social values of business students: implications for management. Journal of Business Ethics, 16(1), 37–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Smith, A., & Rogers, V. (2000). Ethics-related responses to specific situation vignettes: evidence of gender-based differences and occupational socialization. Journal of Business Ethics, 28(1), 74–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. St. Pierre, K., Nelson, E., & Gabbin, A. (1990). A study of the ethical development of accounting majors in relation to other business and non-business disciplines. The Accounting Educators’ Journal (Summer), 23–35.Google Scholar
  70. Stanga, K. G., & Turpen, R. A. (1991). Ethical judgments on selected accounting issues: an empirical study. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(10), 739–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Stevenson, T. H., & Bodkin, C. D. (1996). University Students’ perceptions regarding ethics and acceptability of sales practices: a scenario based study of gender effects. Marketing Education Review, 6(3), 1–13.Google Scholar
  72. Touche Ross. (1988). Ethics in American Business An opinion survey of key business leaders on ethical standards and behavior. Touche-Ross Foundation.Google Scholar
  73. Tsalikis, J., & Oritz-Buonafina, M. (1990). Ethical beliefs’ differences of males and females. Journal of Business Ethics, 9(6), 509–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. West, T., Ravenscroft, S. P., & Shrader, C. B. (2004). Cheating and moral judgment in the college classroom: a natural experiment. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(2), 173–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Whipple, T. W., & Wolf, D. D. (1991). Judgments of marketing students about ethical issues in marketing research: a comparison to marketing practitioners. Journal of Marketing Education, 13(1), 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. White, C. S., & Dooley, R. S. (1993). Ethical or practical: an empirical study of students’ choices in simulated business scenarios. Journal of Business Ethics, 12(8), 643–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zopiatis, A. A., & Krambia-Kapardis, M. (2008). Ethical behavior of tertiary education students in Cyprus. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 647–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementUniversiti Sains MalaysiaMindenMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Economics, Management and AccountingYazd UniversityYazdIran

Personalised recommendations