Facing the Future: Generativity, Stagnation, Intended Legacies, and Well-Being in Later Life

Abstract

Older adults often contemplate the kind of legacy they would like to leave for subsequent generations. Research provides some evidence for relationships between expressions of intended legacies and generativity (caring for the next generation), and how generativity is related to well-being. The current study aims to expand the literature concerning the role of generativity and its counterpart, stagnation, in the likelihood and frequency of expressions of intended legacies (what individuals wish to leave behind when they die), and to parse each factor’s relationship to well-being among older women. Data were drawn from the combined 2014 data collections from the Radcliffe College Class of 1964 and the Women’s Life Paths Study (N = 204; Mage = 68.93). We used newly developed Q-sort measures of generativity and stagnation, and coded legacy from responses to open-ended questions. This study assessed three types of legacy: one that is meaningful in a personal way (personal), a contribution to the common good (broader), and a combination of personal and broader (composite). Although both generativity and stagnation showed some initial association with personal and total legacy, only stagnation was consistently negatively associated with the likelihood of expressing a legacy, frequency of legacy expression, and well-being. The contribution of psychosocial factors to legacy expression, and the utility of examining generativity and stagnation separately, is discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Ackerman, S., Zuroff, D. C., & Moskowitz, D. S. (2000). Generativity in midlife and young adults: Links to agency, communion, and subjective well-being. The International Journal of Aging and Human Development,50(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025406071489.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Block, J. (1961). The Q-sort method in personality assessment and psychiatric research. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Block, J. (2008). The Q-sort in character appraisal: Encoding subjective impressions of persons quantitatively. Washington, D.C: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley, C. L. (1996). Generativity status measure. Interview and scoring manual. Unpublished manuscript, Simon Fraser University.

  5. Bradley, C. L., & Marcia, J. E. (1998). Generativity-stagnation: A five-category model. Journal of Personality,66, 39–64. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.t01-2-00002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cole, E. R., & Stewart, A. J. (1996). Meanings of political participation among Black and White women: Political identity and social responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,71, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.1.130.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cox, K. S., Wilt, J., Olson, B., & McAdams, D. P. (2010). Generativity, the big five, and psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults. Journal of Personality,78, 1185–1208. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00647.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diener, E. D., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., & Griffin, S. (1985). The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,49(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ekerdt, D. J., Luborsky, M., & Lysack, C. (2012). Safe passage of goods and self during residential relocation in later life. Ageing & Society,32, 833–850. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Erikson, E. H. (1950). Childhood and society. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Erikson, E. H. (1974). Dimensions of a new identity. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Erikson, E. H. (1980). Identity and the life cycle. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Erikson, E. H. (1982). The life cycle completed. New York, NY: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grossbaum, M. F., & Bates, G. W. (2002). Correlates of psychological well-being at midlife: The role of generativity, agency and communion, and narrative themes. International Journal of Behavioral Development,26(2), 120–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/01650250042000654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hawley, G. A. (1988). Measures of psychosocial development. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hunter, E. G. (2007–2008). Beyond death: Inheriting the past and giving to the future, transmitting the legacy of one’s self. Omega, 56, 313–329. https://doi.org/10.2190/om.56.4.a.

  17. Hunter, E. G., & Rowles, G. D. (2005). Leaving a legacy: Toward a typology. Journal of Aging Studies,19, 327–347. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2004.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Huta, V., & Zuroff, D. C. (2007). Examining mediators of the link between generativity and well-being. Journal of Adult Development,14, 47–52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-007-9030-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Jia, F., Soucie, K., Alisat, S., & Pratt, M. (2016). Sowing seeds for future generations: Development of generative concern and its relation to environmental narrative identity. International Journal of Behavioral Development,40(5), 466–470. https://doi.org/10.1177/0165025415611260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kane, R. A. (1996). From generation to generation: Thoughts on legacy. Generations,20, 5–9.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kivnick, H. Q. (1996). Remembering and being remembered: The reciprocity of psychological legacy. Generations,20, 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Kotre, J. (1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lang, F. R., & Carstensen, L. L. (2002). Time counts: future time perspective, goals, and social relationships. Psychology and Aging,17(1), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. MacDermid, S. M., Franz, C. E., & De Reus, L. A. (1998). Generativity: At the crossroads of social roles and personality. In D. P. McAdams & E. de St. Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation (pp. 181–226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  25. McAdams, D. P. (2001). The psychology of life stories. Review of General Psychology,5, 100–122. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.2.100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McAdams, D. P., & de St Aubin, E. (1992). A theory of generativity and its assessment through self-report, behavioral acts, and narrative themes in autobiography. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,62(6), 1003–1015. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. McAdams, D. P., de St. Aubin, E., & Logan, R. L. (1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging,8(22), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.8.2.221.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Newton, N. J., & Jones, B. K. (2016). Passing on: Personal attributes associated with midlife expressions of intended legacies. Developmental Psychology,52(2), 341–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039905.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Newton, N. J., & Stewart, A. J. (2011). Coding manual for legacy themes. Unpublished manuscript, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.

  30. Newton, N. J., Stewart, A. J., & Vandewater, E. A. (under review). “Age is opportunity”: Women’s personality trajectories from mid- to later-life.

  31. Ochse, R., & Plug, C. (1986). Cross-cultural investigation of the validity of Erikson’s theory of personality development. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,50(6), 1240–1252. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.50.6.1240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Peterson, B. E. (2002). Longitudinal analysis of midlife generativity, intergenerational roles, and caregiving. Psychology and Aging,17(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.17.1.161.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Peterson, B. E., & Klohnen, E. C. (1995). Realization of generativity in two samples of women at midlife. Psychology and Aging,10(1), 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.10.1.20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Peterson, B. E., Smirles, K. A., & Wentworth, P. A. (1997). Generativity and authoritarianism: Implications for personality, political involvement, and parenting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,72, 1202–1216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Peterson, B. E., & Stewart, A. J. (1996). Antecedents and contexts of generativity motivation at midlife. Psychology and Aging,11, 21–33. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.11.1.21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Rubinstein, R. L. (1996). Childlessness, legacy, and generativity. Generations,20, 58–60.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Smith, C. P., Feld, S. C., & Franz, C. E. (1992). Methodological considerations: Steps in research employing content analysis systems. In C. P. Smith (Ed.), Motivation and Personality: Handbook of thematic content analysis (pp. 515–536). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Stewart, A. J. (1978). A longitudinal study of coping styles in self-defining and socially defined women. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology,46(5), 1079–1084. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.46.5.1079.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Stewart, A. J. (1980). Personality and situation in the prediction of women’s life patterns. Psychology of Women Quarterly,5(2), 195–206. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1980.tb00956.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stewart, A. J., & Vandewater, E. A. (1993). The Radcliffe class of 1964: Career and family social clock projects in a transitional cohort. In K. D. Hulbert & D. T. Schuster (Eds.), Women’s lives through time: Educated American women of the twentieth century (pp. 235–258). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Stewart, A. J., & Vandewater, E. A. (1998). The course of generativity. In D. P. McAdams & E. de St. Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation, (pp. 75–100). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

  42. Stewart, A. J., & Vandewater, E. A. (1999). “If I had it to do over again…”: Midlife review, midcourse corrections, and women’s well-being in midlife. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,76(2), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.2.270.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Tangri, S. S., & Jenkins, S. R. (1986). Stability and change in role innovation and life plans. Sex Roles,14(11–12), 647–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00287695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Van Hiel, A., Mervielde, I., & De Fruyt, F. (2006). Stagnation and generativity: Structure, validity, and different relationships with adaptive and maladaptive personality. Journal of Personality,74(2), 543–573. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00384.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Vandewater, E. A., & Stewart, A. J. (1998). Making commitments, creating lives: Linking women’s roles and personality at midlife. Psychology of Women Quarterly,22(4), 717–738. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-6402.1998.tb00187.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Williams, B., Woodby, L., & Drentea, P. (2010). Ethical capital: ‘What’s a poor man got to leave?’. Sociology of Health & Illness,32(6), 880–897. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9566.2010.01246.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Winter, D. G. (1973). The power motive. New York, NY: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Zacher, H., Schmitt, A., & Gielnik, M. M. (2012). Stepping into my shoes: Generativity as a mediator of the relationship between business owners’ age and family succession. Ageing & Society,32, 673–696. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0144686X11000547.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicky J. Newton.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Legacy coding scheme

Legacy typeDefinitionExamples
PersonalRespondent expresses concerns about making a lasting contribution that is related to his or herself or is solely meaningful in a personal way“I hope I can continue to contribute to the education of midwives and nurse practitioners for many years.”
“I am writing the book I have had (unknown to me) inside me all my life, the story of a family dealing with bipolar disorder and the gifts and tragedies it confers on the people who have it.”
BroaderRespondent expresses concerns about making a lasting contribution for people or places outside of her immediate circle of care, or for the greater good“Volunteer in areas of my strengths = curriculum development, fund-raising, grant-writing for causes I believe in (anti-racism, sexism, homophobia, colonialism).”
“Be involved in helping the poor, the homeless, the hungry.”
CompositeRespondent expresses concerns for both personal legacy and broader legacy; can be in a single statement (1) or with respect to one particular situation (2)“The drafting and passing of local ordinances to maintain a sustainable high quality of eco-friendly life in my jurisdiction has been a gratifying achievement.”
“I hope to develop a website and blog which present my mentoring innovation and creativity focusing on international human rights and social justice.”

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Newton, N.J., Chauhan, P.K. & Pates, J.L. Facing the Future: Generativity, Stagnation, Intended Legacies, and Well-Being in Later Life. J Adult Dev 27, 70–80 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-019-09330-3

Download citation

Keywords

  • Legacy
  • Generativity
  • Stagnation
  • Well-being
  • Older women