Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Valuing Risk: Endorsed Risk Activities and Motives Across Adulthood

  • Published:
Journal of Adult Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study used content analysis of survey responses to help understand attitudes regarding taking risks across the adult lifespan. A sample of 842 U.S. adults ages 18–92 were asked to report their personal philosophy of taking risks, and what risks they felt people their age should take more often. Thematic categories were identified to classify the range of risk activities and explicit motives for taking risks. Responses were coded, and frequencies of those risk activities and motives were compared between young adults (ages 18–29), middle adults (30–59), and older adults (60+). Logistic regression was used to identify linear and curvilinear trends. Interpreting results within a lifespan developmental task framework, we concluded that risk taking may be valued as a way to create opportunities during young adulthood, a means to capitalize on those opportunities in middle adulthood, and as a strategy for managing resources and well-being in late adulthood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnett, J. J. (2000). Emerging adulthood. A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55(5), 469–480.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnett, J. J. (2005). The developmental context of substance use in emerging adulthood. Journal of Drug Issues, 35(2), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, P. B., Reese, H., & Lipsett, L. (1980). Lifespan developmental psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 65–110.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blais, A. R., & Weber, E. U. (2006). A domain-specific risk-taking (DOSPERT) scale for adult populations. Judgment and Decision Making, 1(1), 33–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brandtstädter, J., Rothermund, K., Kranz, D., & Kühn, W. (2010). Final decentrations: Personal goals, rationality perspectives, and the awareness of life’s finitude. European Psychologist, 15(2), 152–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, S., Rosman, A., Seleski, S., Garcia, M., Lee, S., Barnes, J., & Schwartz, A. (2012). A medical risk attitude subscale for DOSPERT. Judgment and Decision Making, 7(2), 189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carstensen, L. L. (1995). Evidence for a life-span theory of socioemotional selectivity. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 4, 151–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dohmen, T., Falk, A., Huffman, D., Sunde, U., Schupp, J., & Wagner, G. G. (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association, 9(3), 522–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, J. (2005). Risk taking as developmentally appropriate experimentation for college students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 20(2), 219–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebner, N. C., Freund, A. M., & Baltes, P. B. (2006). Developmental changes in personal goal orientation from young to late adulthood: From striving for gains to maintenance and prevention of losses. Psychology and Aging, 21(4), 664–678.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elder, G. H., & Rockwell, R. C. (1979). The life-course and human development: An ecological perspective. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 2(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, B. J., Giudice, M. D., Dishion, T. J., Figueredo, A. J., Gray, P., Griskevicius, V., … Wilson, D. S. (2012). The evolutionary basis of risky adolescent behavior: Implications for science, policy, and practice. Developmental Psychology, 48(3), 598–623.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(1), 107–115.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H., & Erikson, J. M. (1998). The life cycle completed (extended version). New York: WW Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Furby, L., & Beyth-Marom, R. (1992). Risk taking in adolescence: A decision-making perspective. Developmental Review, 12(1), 1–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grable, J. E., & Rabbani, A. (2014). Risk tolerance across life domains: Evidence from a sample of older adults. Journal of Financial Counseling and Planning, 25(2), 174.

    Google Scholar 

  • Havighurst, R. J. (1972). Developmental tasks and education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckhausen, J., Wrosch, C., & Schulz, R. (2010). A motivational theory of life-span development. Psychological Review, 117(1), 32–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Hoppmann, C. A., Coats, H. A., & Blanchard-Fields, F. (2008). Goals and everyday problem solving: Examining the link between age-related goals and problem-solving strategy use. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 15(4), 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutteman, R., Hennecke, M., Orth, U., Reitz, A. K., & Specht, J. (2014). Developmental tasks as a framework to study personality development in adulthood and old age. European Journal of Personality, 28(3), 267–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krippendorff, K. (2004). Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton, M. P., Kleban, M. H., Rajagopal, D., & Dean, J. (1992). Dimensions of affective experience in three age groups. Psychology and Aging, 7(2), 171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mata, R., Josef, A. K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Age differences in risky choice: A meta-analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235(1), 18–29.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mather, M., Mazar, N., Gorlick, M. A., Lighthall, N. R., Burgeno, J., Schoeke, A., & Ariely, D. (2012). Risk preferences and aging: The “certainty effect” in older adults’ decision making. Psychology and Aging, 27(4), 801–816.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ravert, R. D., & Gomez-Scott, J. (2015). Why take risks? Four good reasons according to emerging adult college students. Journal of Adolescent Research, 30(5), 565–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ritter, J. O., & Freund, A. M. (2014). Values across adulthood: A neglected developmental construct guiding thought and action over time.In Verhaeghen, P., Hertzog, C.K. (ed.). The Oxford handbook of emotion, social cognition, and problem solving in adulthood.

  • Rolison, J. J., Hanoch, Y., Wood, S., & Liu, P. J. (2013). Risk-taking differences across the adult life span: A question of age and domain. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbt081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romer, D. (2003). Reducing adolescent risk: Toward an integrated approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25(1), 1–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Basic human values: An overview. Retrieved May 23, 2018, from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237364051.

  • Shulman, E. P., Harden, K. P., Chein, J. M., & Steinberg, L. (2015). Sex differences in the developmental trajectories of impulse control and sensation-seeking from early adolescence to early adulthood. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 44(1), 1–17.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Peters, E., Finucane, M. L., & MacGregor, D. G. (2005). Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychology, 24(4S), S35–S40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L. (2010). A dual systems model of adolescent risk-taking. Developmental Psychobiology, 52(3), 216–224.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Steinberg, L., Albert, D., Cauffman, E., Banich, M., Graham, S., & Woolard, J. (2008). Age differences in sensation seeking and impulsivity as indexed by behavior and self-report: Evidence for a dual systems model. Developmental Psychology, 44(6), 1764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme development in qualitative content analysis and thematic analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & Health Sciences, 15(3), 398–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webster, J. D., Westerhof, G. J., & Bohlmeijer, E. T. (2014). Wisdom and mental health across the lifespan. The Journals of Gerontology Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 69(2), 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M. (2007). Sensation seeking and risky behavior. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zuckerman, M., & Kuhlman, D. M. (2000). Personality and risk-taking: Common biosocial factors. Journal of Personality, 68(6), 999–1029.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Human Development & Family Science, University of Missouri, 314 Gentry, Columbia, MO, 65211, USA

    Russell D. Ravert & Lindsey M. Murphy

  2. Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA

    M. Brent Donnellan

Authors
  1. Russell D. Ravert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Lindsey M. Murphy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. Brent Donnellan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Russell D. Ravert.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to report.

Ethical Approval

The authors confirm that the research presented in this article met the ethical guidelines, including adherence to the legal requirements, of the United States and received approval from the Institutional Review Board at University of Missouri.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ravert, R.D., Murphy, L.M. & Donnellan, M.B. Valuing Risk: Endorsed Risk Activities and Motives Across Adulthood. J Adult Dev 26, 11–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-018-9300-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10804-018-9300-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation