Journal of Adult Development

, Volume 22, Issue 4, pp 206–220 | Cite as

Values and Personal Life Investment in Middle-Age: Measures and Relations



The present study analyzed the factor structure of Schwartz Value Survey (SVS; 46 items) and the personal life investment (PLI; 10 items) scale, as well as the mutual relations between these two measures. The 50-year-old participants (n = 217–224) were drawn from the ongoing Finnish Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Personal and Social Development. For the SVS, the confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) supported the 14-factor structure: achievement, tradition, stimulation, hedonism, security, conformity, power, universalism (with sub-factors of societal concern, tolerance and protecting nature), benevolence (with sub-factors of caring and dependability) and self-direction (with sub-factors of autonomy of action and autonomy of thought). Using these 14 factors, the CFA confirmed the existence of higher-order factors with both two (person-focused and social-focused dimensions) and four factors (self-transcendence, self-enhancement, conservation and openness to change). In assessing personal life investments, three factors emerged using CFA: soul-searching (items of cognition, independence, life reflection and death), basic needs (sexuality, family and work) and pleasure (health, leisure and friends). The three PLI factors and 14 SVS items related to each other in some ways. For example, soul-searching correlated statistically significantly and positively with all three of universalism’s sub-factors (societal concern, tolerance, and protecting nature). Basic needs correlated positively with achievement and benevolence (dependability). Finally, pleasure correlated positively, for example, with benevolence (caring), and hedonism.


Values Personal life investment Factor structure Middle-age 



The preparation of this article was funded by the Academy of Finland through grants (118316 and 135347) awarded to Katja Kokko. We appreciate Professor Lea Pulkkinen’s contribution to the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Personality and Social Development (JYLS) over the years, and the Academy of Finland’s grant (127125) awarded to her for the most recent data collection of the Jyväskylä Longitudinal Study of Personality and Social Development in 2009.


  1. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  2. Allport, G. W., & Vernon, P. E. (1931). A study of values. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
  3. Baltes, P. B., & Mayer, K. U. (Eds.). (1999). The Berlin aging study: Aging from 70 to 100. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Beiser, M. (1974). Components and correlates of mental well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 15, 320–327.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caprara, G. V., Caprara, M., & Steca, P. (2003). Personality’s correlates of adult development and aging. European Psychologist, 8, 131–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Costa, P. T, Jr, & McCrae, R. R. (2001). A theoretical context for adult temperament. In T. D. Wachs & G. A. Kohnstamm (Eds.), Temperament in context (pp. 1–21). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  9. Datler, G., Jagodzinski, W., & Schmidt, P. (2013). Two theories on the test bench: Internal and external validity of the theories of Ronald Inglehart and Shalom Schwartz. Social Science Research, 42, 906–925.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Davidov, E. (2008). A cross-country and cross-time comparison of the human values measurement with the second round of the European Social Survey. Survey Research Methods, 2, 33–46.Google Scholar
  11. Davidov, E., Schmidt, P., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Bringing values back in: The adequacy of the European Social Survey to Measure Values in 20 Countries. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72(3), 420–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1995). Human autonomy: The basis for true self-esteem. In M. Kernis (Ed.), Efficacy, agency, and self-esteem (pp. 31–49). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  13. Dubow, E. F., Huesmann, L. R., Boxer, P., Pulkkinen, L., & Kokko, K. (2006). Middle childhood and adolescent contextual and personal predictors of adult educational and occupational outcomes: A mediational model in two countries. Developmental Psychology, 42, 937–949.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Feather, N. T. (1975). Values in education and society. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  15. Fischer, R. (2012). Value isomorphism in the European Value Survey: Exploration of meaning shifts in values across levels. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology,. doi: 10.1177/0022022111413276.Google Scholar
  16. Fontaine, J. R. J., Poortinga, Y. H., Delbeke, L., & Schwartz, S. H. (2008). Structural equivalence of the values domain across cultures: Distinguishing sampling fluctuations from meaningful variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 39, 345 doi: 10.1177/0022022108318112.
  17. Ford, K., & Chamratrithirong, A. (2012). Midlife sexuality among Thai adults: Adjustment to aging in the Thai family context. Sexuality and Culture, 16, 158–171.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Gott, M., & Hinchliff, S. (2003). How important is sex in later life? The views of older people. Social Science and Medicine, 56, 1617–1628.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indices in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (1993). A dark side of the American dream: correlates of financial success as a central life aspiration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 410–422.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kenny, D. A. (2014). Measuring model fit—in webpage.
  22. Knoppen, D., & Saris, W. E. (2009). Do we have to combine values in the Schwartz’ human values scale? A comment on the Davidov studies. Survey Research Methods, 3, 91–103.Google Scholar
  23. Kokko, K., Pulkkinen, L., Huesmann, L. R., Dubow, E. F., & Boxer, P. (2009). Intensity of aggression in childhood as a predictor of different forms of adult aggression: A two-country (Finland and United States) analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence, 19, 9–34.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Lachman, M. E. (2004). Development in midlife. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 305–331.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Lovejoy, A. O. (1950). Terminal and adjectival values. The Journal of Philosophy, 47, 593–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Markus, H. R., Ryff, C. D., Curhan, K.,& Palmersheim, K. (2004). In their own words: Well-being at midlife among high school and college-educated adults. See Brim et al. 2004 (pp. 273–319).Google Scholar
  27. Maslow, A. H. (Ed.). (1959). New knowledge in human values. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  28. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T, Jr. (1999). A five-factor theory of personality. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 139–153). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  29. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998–2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  30. Pitkänen, T., Kokko, K., Lyyra, A.-L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2008). A developmental approach to alcohol drinking behaviour in adulthood: A follow-up study from age 8 to age 42. Addiction, 103(Suppl I), 48–68.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Pulkkinen, L. (2006). The Jyväskylä longitudinal study of personality and social development. In L. Pulkkinen, J. Kaprio, & R. J. Rose (Eds.), Socioemotional development and health from adolescence to adulthood (pp. 29–55). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pulkkinen, L., Fyrstén, S., Kinnunen, U., Kinnunen, M-L., Pitkänen, T., & Kokko, K. (2003). 40 + Erään ikäluokan selviytymistarina. [40 + A successful transition to middle adulthood in a cohort of Finns] (Rep. No. 349). Jyväskylä, Finland: Reports from the Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  33. Pulkkinen, L., & Kokko, K. (2010). Keski-ikä elämänvaiheena [Middle age as a stage of life]. Reports from the Department of Psychology, University of Jyväskylä, Jyväskylä.Google Scholar
  34. Puohiniemi, M. (1995). Values, consumer attitudes and behavior: An application of Schwartz’s value theory to the analysis of consumer behavior and attitudes in two national samples. Doctoral dissertation, University of Helsinki, Department of Social Psychology.Google Scholar
  35. Räikkönen, E., Kokko, K., Chen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2012). Patterns of adult roles, their antecedents and psychosocial well-being correlates among Finns born in 1959. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 3, 211–227.Google Scholar
  36. Rescher, N. (1969). Introduction to value theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  37. Roberts, B. W., & Robins, R. W. (2000). Broad dispositions, broad aspirations: The intersection of personality traits and major life goals. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1284–1296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Rohan, M. J. (2000). A rose by any name? The values construct. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 255–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rokeach, M. (1973). The nature of human values. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rokeach, M., & Ball-Rokeach, S. J. (1989). Stability and change in American value priorities. American Psychologist, 44, 775–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Ryan, R. M., Chirkov, V. I., Little, T. D., Sheldon, K. M., Timoshina, E., & Deci, E. L. (1999). The American dream in Russia: Extrinsic aspirations and well-being in two cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 1509–1524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schindler, I. (2005). Late-life development of personal life investment: The “musts” and “cans” of aging. Dresden, Germany: TUDpress (Dresden University Press). 5935.pdf
  44. Schindler, I., Nesselroade, J. R., & Staudinger, U. M. (2006). Development and structural dynamics of personal life investment in old age. Psychology and Aging, 21, 737–753.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Schindler, I., & Staudinger, U. M. (2008). Obligatory and optional personal life investments in old and very old age: Validation and functional relations. Motivation and Emotion, 32, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Schmuck, P., Kasser, T., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic goals: Their structure and relationship to well-being in German and U.S. college students. Social Indicators Research, 50, 225–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  48. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the content and structure of values? Journal of Social Issues, 50, 19–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schwartz, S. H. (1999). Cultural value differences: Some implications for work. Applied Psychology: An International Journal, 48, 23–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwartz, S. H. (2005). Basic human values: Their content and structure across cultures. In A. Tamayo & J. Porto (Eds.), Valores e trabalbo (Values and work) (pp. 21–55). Brasilia: Editora Vozes.Google Scholar
  51. Schwartz, S. H. (2006). Les valeurs de base de la personne: Theorie, measures et applications [Basic human values: Theory, measurement, and applications]. Revue francaise desociologie, 42, 249–288.Google Scholar
  52. Schwartz, S. H. (2007). Value orientations: Measurement, antecedents and consequences across nations. In R. Jowell, C. Roberts, R. Fitzgerald, & G. Eva (Eds.), Measuring attitudes cross-nationally. Lessons from the European Social Survey (pp. 169–203). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward a theory of the universal content and structure of values: Extensions and cross-cultural replications. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 878–891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Schwartz, S. H., & Boehnke, K. (2004). Evaluating the structure of human values with confirmatory factor analysis. Journal of Research in Personality, 38, 230–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Schwartz, S. H., Puohiniemi, M., & Puohiniemi, E. (2011). Kulttuuriset arvo-orientaatiot: kansallisten erojen luonne ja seuraukset. [Cultural value orientations: Nature and implications of national differences]. Espoo: Limor kustannus.Google Scholar
  57. Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Identifying culture-specifics in the content and structure of values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26, 92–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Schwartz, S. H., Vecchione, M., Fischer, R., Ramos, A., Demirutku, K., Dirilen-Gumus, O., et al. (2012). Refining the theory of basic individual values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 663–688.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Seligman, C., Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.). (1996). The psychology of values: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 8). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  60. Smith, P. B., & Schwartz, S. H. (1997). Values. In J. W. Berry, M. H. Segall, & C. Kagitcibasi (Eds.), Social behavior and applications: Vol. III of handbook of cross-cultural psychology (2nd ed., pp. 77–118). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  61. Statistics Finland. (2006). Suomen tilastollinen vuosikirja 2006 [Statistical Yearbook of Finland 2006]. Hämeenlinna: Karisto Oy.Google Scholar
  62. Staudinger, U. M., & Fleeson, W. (1996). Self and personality in old and very old age: A sample case of resilience? Development and Psychopathology, 8, 867–885.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Staudinger, U. M., Freund, A. M., Linden, M., & Maas, I. (1999). Self, personality, and life regulation: Facets of psychological resilience in old age. In P. B. Baltes & K. U. Mayer (Eds.), The Berlin aging study: Aging from 70 to 100 (pp. 302–328). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland
  2. 2.Gerontology Research Center, Department of Health SciencesUniversity of JyväskyläJyväskyläFinland

Personalised recommendations