Becoming Generative: Socializing Influences Recalled in Life Stories in Late Midlife
Through content analysis of adult autobiographies, this study explored possible developmental antecedents of generativity—an adult’s commitment to caring for and contributing to the well-being of future generations. A sample of 158 African-American and Euro-American adults in their late 50s completed self-report measures of generativity and various forms of societal engagement, and then each participant was interviewed in depth to tell the story of his or her life. Replicating past studies, generativity was positively associated with current political and civic engagement and with involvement in religious institutions. For the entire sample, high levels of generativity were predicted by narrative accounts of positive socializing influences coming from the family, teachers and mentors, the education system, and other valued societal institutions. Among the African-American subsample, however, socioeconomic status trumped these positive socializing influences as a strong statistical predictor of generativity, even as African-Americans scored higher than Euro-Americans on both generativity and positive socializing influences. Gender differences also emerged. The results suggest that both social class and positive socializing influences from individuals and institutions may shape generativity for midlife American adults and that these developmental relationships may differ as a function of race/ethnicity and gender.
KeywordsGenerativity Socializing influences Race differences Gender differences Life stories
This study was funded by a grant to the second author from the Foley Family Foundation to establish the Foley Center for the Study of Lives. The authors would like to thank Gina Logan for coordinating this study and Josh Swenson for assistance in data coding.
- de St. Aubin, E., McAdams, D. P., & Kim, T. C. (Eds.) (2004). The generative society: Caring for future generations. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
- Dillon, M. & Wink, P. (2004). American religion, generativity, and the therapeutic culture. In E. de St. Aubin, D.P. McAdams, & K. Tae-Chang (Eds.), The generative society: Caring for future generations (153–174). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and Society. (2nd ed.) New York, Norton & Co.Google Scholar
- Erikson, E. H. (1969). Ghandi’s truth. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
- Franz, C. E., McClelland, D. C., & Weinberger, J. (1991) Childhood antecedents of conventional social accomplishment in midlife adults: A 36-year prospective study. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 586-595.Google Scholar
- Josselson, R., Lieblich, A., & McAdams, D. P. (Eds.). (2003). Up close and personal: The teaching and learning of narrative research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
- Keyes, C. L. M. & Ryff, C. D. (1998). Generativity in adult lives: Social structural contours and quality of life consequences. In E. de St. Aubin & D.P. McAdams (Eds.), Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation (227-263). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- Kotre, J. (1984). Outliving the self: Generativity and the interpretation of lives. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
- MacDermid, S. M., Franz, C. E., & De Reus, L. (1998) Generativity: At the crossroads of social roles and personality. In D.P. McAdams & E. de St. Aubin (Eds.), Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation. (pp. 181-226). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
- McAdams, D. P. (1993). The stories we live by: Personal myths and the making of the self. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- McAdams, D. P. (2001). Generativity in midlife. In M. E. Lachman (Ed.), Handbook of midlife development (pp. 395–443). New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- McAdams, D. P. (2008). Personal narratives and the life story. In O.P. John, R.W. Robins & L.A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research. (3rd Ed., pp. 241–261). New York, Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- McAdams, D. P., & de St. Aubin, E. (Eds.). (1998). Generativity and adult development: How and why we care for the next generation. Washington: American Psychological Association Press.Google Scholar
- McAdams, D. P., Reynolds, J., Lewis, M., Patten, A., & Bowman, P. J. (2001). When bad things turn good and good things turn bad: Sequences of redemption and contamination in life narrative, and their relation to psychosocial adaptation in midlife adults and in students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27, 474–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Rossi, A. (Ed.). (2001). Caring and doing for others: Social responsibility in the domains of family, work, and community. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Stewart, A. J., Franz, C. E., & Layton, L. (1988). The changing self: Using personal documents to study lives. Journal of Personality, 23, 435–449.Google Scholar
- The Center for Information & Research on Civic Learning and Engagement. (2002). The civic and political health of the nation: A generational report. New Brunswick, NJ: S. Keeter, C. Zukin, M. Andolina, & K. Jenkins. Retrieved from http://www.civicyouth.org/research/products/Civic_Political_Health.pdf.
- Wisconsin Longitudinal Study (WLS) Questionnaires. (2003-2005). Hauser, R. M. and Sewell, W. H. (Principal investigators.) Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin-Madison, WLS. Retrieved from: http://www.ssc.wisc.edu/wlsresearch/documentation/questionnaires/mail2k.html.