Allied Health Professionals’ Knowledge and Use of ASD Intervention Practices

  • Jessica Paynter
  • Rhylee Sulek
  • Sarah Luskin-Saxby
  • David Trembath
  • Deb Keen
Original Paper

Abstract

Allied health professionals (AHPs) are trusted sources of information and intervention for clients with autism spectrum disorder. However, the level of implementation of empirically-supported therapies and the accuracy of the knowledge they use to inform intervention selection is largely unknown. The present study explored the accuracy of AHPs’ knowledge and use of practices, and explored links to individual attitudes and organisational culture. Overall results from the 156 AHPs surveyed suggested general accuracy of knowledge, and use of empirically supported treatments, with accuracy linked to use. Use of practices unsupported by research was linked to organisational culture and openness to new interventions. The presence of misinformation and the impact on selection and use of effective practices are discussed.

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorder Allied health professionals Knowledge translation Implementation science Evidence-based practice 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank the allied health professionals who participated in this research.

Author Contributions

JP conceived the study, co-ordinated the study, assisted with design and completion of statistical analyses, and drafted the manuscript. RS collected and analysed data and contributed to manuscript preparation. SL-S contributed to manuscript preparation and interpretation of findings. DT assisted with the design and co-ordination of the study, selection of analyses, and contributed to manuscript preparation. DK assisted with the design and co-ordination of the study, selection of analyses, and contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. Aarons, G. A. (2004). Mental health provider attitudes toward adoption of evidence-based practice: The Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale (EBPAS). Mental Health Services Research, 6(2), 61–74.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Auert, E. -J., Trembath, D., Arciuli, J., & Thomas, D. (2012). Parents’ expectations, awareness, and experiences of accessing evidence-based speech-language pathology services for their children with autism. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(2), 109–118.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Boynton, J. (2012). Facilitated Communication—what harm it can do: Confessions of a former facilitator. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 6(1), 3–13.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2012.674680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carlon, S., Carter, M., & Stephenson, J. (2015). Decision-making regarding early intervention by parents of children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities, 27(3), 285–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Case-Smith, J., & Arbesman, M. (2008). Evidence-based review of interventions for autism used in or of relevance to occupational therapy. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 62(4), 416–429.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2012. Surveillance Summaries, 65(3), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheung, G., Trembath, D., Arciuli, J., & Togher, L. (2013). The impact of workplace factors on evidence-based speech-language pathology practice for children with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 15(4), 396–406.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Deyro, M. C., Simon, E. W., & Guay, J. (2016). Parental awareness of empirically established treatments for autism spectrum disorders. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 31(3), 184–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gorman, B. J. (1998). Facilitated communication in America: Eight years and counting. Skeptic, 6(3), 64–71.Google Scholar
  11. Hennel, S., Coates, C., Symeonides, C., Gulenc, A., Smith, L., Price, A. M. H., & Hiscock, H. (2016). Diagnosing autism: Contemporaneous surveys of parent needs and paediatric practice. Journal of Paediatrics and Child Health, 52(5), 506–511.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Kadar, M., McDonald, R., & Lentin, P. (2012). Evidence-based practice in occupational therapy services for children with autism spectrum disorders in Victoria, Australia. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 59(4), 284–293.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Lang, R., O’Reilly, M., Healy, O., Rispoli, M., Lydon, H., Streusand, W., … Lancioni, G. (2012). Sensory integration therapy for autism spectrum disorders: A systematic review. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(3), 1004–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Lilienfeld, S. O. (2005). Scientifically unsupported and supported interventions for childhood psychopathology: A summary. Pediatrics, 115(3), 761–764.  https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2004-1713.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Lilienfeld, S. O., Marshall, J., Todd, J. T., & Shane, H. C. (2014). The persistence of fad interventions in the face of negative scientific evidence: Facilitated communication for autism as a case example. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 8(2), 62–101.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2014.976332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lord, C., & Bishop, S. L. (2010). Autism spectrum disorders: Diagnosis, prevalence, and services for children and families. Social Policy Report Society for Research in Child Development, 24(2), 1–21.Google Scholar
  17. Lord, C., Wagner, A., Rogers, S., Szatmari, P., Aman, M., Charman, T., … Guthrie, D. (2005). Challenges in evaluating psychosocial interventions for autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(6), 695–708.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Maxwell, S. E., & Delaney, H. D. (2004). Designing experiments and analyzing data: A model comparison perspective (Vol. 2nd). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  19. Metz, B., Mulick, J. A., & Butter, E. M. (2005). Autism: A late-20th-century fad magnet. In J. W. Jacobson, R. M. Foxx, & J. A. Mulick (Eds.), Controversial therapies for developmental disabilities: Fad, fashion and science in professional practice (pp. 237–263) Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  20. Miller, V. A., Schreck, K. A., Mulick, J. A., & Butter, E. (2012). Factors related to parents’ choices of treatments for their children with autism spectrum disorders. Research in Autism Spectrum Disorders, 6(1), 87–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Mostert, M. P. (2010). Facilitated communication and its legitimacy—Twenty-first century developments. Exceptionality, 18(1), 31–41.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09362830903462524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Nail-Chiwetalu, B., & Ratner, N. B. (2007). An assessment of the information-seeking abilities and needs of practicing speech-language pathologists. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 95(2), 182.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. National Autism Centre. (2015). Findings and Conclusions: National Standards Project Phase 2. Retrieved September 29, 2017, from http://www.nationalautismcenter.org/national-standards-project/phase-2/.
  24. National Collaborating Centre for Mental Health. (2013). Autism: The management and support of children and young people on the Autism Spectrum. Leicester: British Psychological Society.Google Scholar
  25. Paynter, J., Ferguson, S., Fordyce, K., Joosten, A., Paku, S., Stephens, M., … Keen, D. (2017). Utilisation of evidence-based practices by ASD early intervention service providers. Autism, 21(2), 167–180.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Paynter, J., & Keen, D. (2015). Knowledge and use of intervention practices by community-based early intervention service providers. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(6), 1614–1623.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Prior, M., & Roberts, J. (2012). Early Intervention for Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders: ‘Guidelines for Good Practice’. Retrieved September 29, 2017, from http://www.fahcsia.gov.au/sites/default/files/documents/11_2012/early_intervention_practice_guidlines.pdf.
  28. Research Autism. (2017). Interventions, Treatments and Therapies for Autism. Retrieved September 29, 2017, from http://www.researchautism.net/interventions.
  29. Ridge, K., & Guerin, S. (2011). Irish clinicians’ views of interventions for children with autistic spectrum disorders. Autism, 15(2), 239–252.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Roberts, J. M. A., Williams, K., Smith, K., & Campbell, L. (2016). Autism spectrum disorder: Evidence-based/evidence-informed good practice for supports provided to preschool children, their families and carers. National Disability Insurance Agency, Australia.Google Scholar
  31. Russell, D. J., Rivard, L. M., Walter, S. D., Rosenbaum, P. L., Roxborough, L., Cameron, D., … Avery, L. M. (2010). Using knowledge brokers to facilitate the uptake of pediatric measurement tools into clinical practice: A before-after intervention study. Implementation Science, 5, 92.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Sackett, D., Rosenberg, W. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t: It’s about integrating individual clinical expertise and the best external evidence. British Medical Journal, 312, 71–72.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Sigafoos, J., & Schlosser, R. (2012). An experiential account of facilitated communication. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 6(1), 1–2.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17489539.2012.710992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stahmer, A. C., Collings, N. M., & Palinkas, L. A. (2005). Early intervention practices for children with autism: Descriptions from community providers. Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, 20(2), 66–79.  https://doi.org/10.1177/10883576050200020301.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  35. Trembath, D., Paynter, J., Keen, D., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2015). “Attention: Myth Follows!” facilitated communication, parent and professional attitudes towards evidence-based practice, and the power of misinformation. Evidence-Based Communication Assessment and Intervention, 9(3), 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Trembath, D., & Vivanti, G. (2014). Problematic but predictive: Individual differences in children with autism spectrum disorders. International Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 16(1), 57–60.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Vallino-Napoli, L. D., & Reilly, S. (2004). Evidence-based health care: A survey of speech pathology practice. Advances in Speech Language Pathology, 6(2), 107–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wilkinson, S. A., Hinchliffe, F., Hough, J., & Chang, A. (2012). Baseline evidence-based practice use, knowledge, and attitudes of allied health professionals: A survey to inform staff training and organisational change. Journal of Allied Health, 41(4), 177–184.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Wong, C., Odom, S. L., Hume, K. A., Cox, A. W., Fettig, A., Kucharczyk, S., … Schultz, T. R. (2015). Evidence-based practices for children, youth, and young adults with autism spectrum disorder: A comprehensive review. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(7), 1951–1966.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Zipoli, R. P., & Kennedy, M. (2005). Evidence-based practice among speech-language pathologists: Attitudes, utilization, and barriers. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 14(3), 208–220.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Menzies Health Institute QueenslandGriffith UniversitySouthportAustralia
  2. 2.Autism Centre of Excellence, School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversityMt GravattAustralia
  3. 3.School of Applied PsychologyGriffith UniversitySouthportAustralia

Personalised recommendations