Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 485–501 | Cite as

Assessing Personal Constructs of Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Person-Centered Measure of Social Cognition

Original Paper

Abstract

Many protocols assessing social communication skills of adolescents with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are based on behavioral observations. It has been suggested, however, that social cognition encompasses processes underlying observable behaviors. Such processes include personal constructs, which can be assessed using repertory grids. Personal constructs of five adolescents with ASD with average or above average intelligence and receptive and expressive language skills were explored using repertory grids in this study. With visual structure and verbal scaffolding, all participants successfully engaged in the repertory grid process. Data suggest participants had well organized, complex construct systems, a significant understanding of social roles, and were interested in social interactions. Repertory grids may provide additional person-centered information for assessing social communication skills in ASD.

Keywords

Autism Adolescent Person-centered assessment Personal constructs Social cognition Repertory grid 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was not supported by grants or other financial supports. Colleagues who assisted in the study included Terese Conrad, MA, CCC-SLP, Clinical Supervisor at the Wichita State University Evelyn Hendren Cassat Speech-Language Hearing Clinic; Mary Beasley, MA, CCC-SLP, Director of the Wichita State University Evelyn Hendren Cassat Speech-Language Hearing Clinic; and Patrice Rawlins, APRN, Teaching Associate for the University of Kansas’ Department of Pediatrics and Child Development. This study has been taken from the doctoral dissertation “An Exploration of Personal Constructs and Cognitive Complexities of Adolescents with Autism Spectrum Disorder”, which was submitted to the Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders and the faculty of the Graduate School of Wichita State University in Wichita, KS, USA in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctorate of Philosophy by Sean Hess in December, 2015.

Author Contributions

SH conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, performed the measurements and statistical analyses, participated in interpreting the data, and drafted the manuscript. TS and AD conceived of the study, participated in its design and coordination, participated in interpreting the data, and helped draft the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Funding

This study was not funded.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declares that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in this study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed Consent

Informed consent and informed assent were obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. American Psychological Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th edn.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Applebee, A. N. (1975). Developmental changes in consensus in construing within a specified domain. British Journal of Psychiatry, 66, 473–480.Google Scholar
  3. Applebee, A. N. (1976). The development of children’s responses to repertory grids. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 15, 101–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on theory of mind and autism. Cambridge, MA: Bradford Book, MIT Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bell, R. C. (1990). Analytic issues in the use of repertory grid technique. In G. J. Neimeyer & R. A. Neimeyer (Eds.), Advances in personal construct psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 25–48). Greenwich, CT: JAI.Google Scholar
  6. Bellini, S. (2006). Building social relationships: A systematic approach to teaching social interaction skills to children and adolescents with autism spectrum disorders and other social difficulties. Shawnee Mission, KS: Autism Asperger Publishing.Google Scholar
  7. Blowers, G. H., & O’Connor, K. P. (1996). Personal construct psychology in the clinical context. Ottawa, CA: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bowers, L., Huisingh, R., & LoGiudice, C. (2007). Test of problem solving: Adolescent. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  9. Bowers, L., Huisingh, R., & LoGiudice, C. (2010). Social language development test: Adolescent. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  10. Brown, L., Sherbenou, R. J., & Johnson, S. K. (1997). Test of nonverbal intelligence (3rd edn.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  11. Caputi, P., & Keynes, N. (2001). A note on the stability of structural measures based on repertory grids. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 14, 51–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Carrow-Woolfolk, E. (1999). Comprehensive assessment of spoken language. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  13. Coelho, C., Ylvisaker, M., & Turkstra, L. S. (2005). Nonstandardized assessment approaches for individuals with traumatic brain injuries. Seminars in Speech and Language, 26(4), 223–241.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Constantino, J. N., & Gruber, C. F. (2012). Social responsiveness scale (2nd edn.). Torrence, CA: WPS.Google Scholar
  15. Dagnan, D., & Ruddick, L. (1995). The use of analogue scales and personal questionnaires for interviewing people with learning disabilities. Clinical Psychology Forum, 79, 21–24.Google Scholar
  16. Dalton, P. (1996). When words fail: A personal construct approach to children’s construing. Educational and Child Psychology, 13, 21–28.Google Scholar
  17. Dempsey, D. J., & Neimeyer, R. A. (1995). Organization of personal knowledge: Convergent validation of implications grids and repertory grids as measures of system structure. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 8, 251–261.Google Scholar
  18. Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, D. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th edn.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Clinical.Google Scholar
  19. Feixas, G., Moliner, J. L., Montes, J. N., Mari, M. T., & Neimeyer, R. A. (1992). The stability of structural measures derived from repertory grids. International Journal of Personal Construct Psychology, 5, 25–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fransella, F. (2003). International handbook of personal construct psychology. West Sussex: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fransella, F., Bell, R., & Bannister, D. (2004). A manual for repertory grid technique (2nd edn.). West Sussex: Wiley.Google Scholar
  22. Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Autism: Beyond “theory of mind”. Cognition, 50, 115–132.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (2009). Rep 5 conceptual representation software. Cobble Hill, BC: Centre for Person-Computer Studies.Google Scholar
  24. Garcia-Winner, M. (2011). Social thinking-social communication profile. Retrieved August 25, 2014, from http://www.socialthinking.com/Articles?name=Social%20Thinking%20Social%20Communication%20Profile.
  25. Gilliam, J. E., & Miller, L. (2006). Pragmatic language skills inventory. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  26. Gresham, F. M., & Elliott, S. N. (2008). Social skills improvement system (SSIS). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
  27. Hare, D. J., Jones, J. P. R., & Paine, C. (1999). Approaching reality: The use of personal construct assessment in working with people with Asperger syndrome. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 3, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ijaz, T., & Mahmood, Z. (2012). Personal construct system of a runaway adolescent: An illustrative case study. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 25, 325–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jackson, D. N., & Paunonen, S. V. (1981). Personality structure and assessment. Annual Review of Psychology, 31, 503–551.Google Scholar
  30. Janzen, J. E. (2003). Understanding the nature of autism: A guide to the autism spectrum disorders (2nd edn.). Austin, TX: Hammill Institute on Disabilities.Google Scholar
  31. Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs: Volume one: A theory of personality. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  32. Kleiman, L. I. (2003). Functional communication profile revised. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  33. Lohaus, A. (1986). Standardizations in methods of data collection; Adverse effects on reliability? Australian Psychologist, 21, 241–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mathison, S. (2005). Encyclopedia of evaluation. SAGE Publications. doi: 10.4135/9781412950558.
  35. Neimeyer, R. A. (1985). The development of personal construct psychology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
  36. Neimeyer, R. A. (1993). Constructivist approaches to the measurement of meaning. In G. J. Neimeyer (Ed.), Constructivist assessment: A casebook (pp. 58–103). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  37. Nippold, M. A. (2007). Later language development: School-age children, adolescents, and young adults (3rd edn.). Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  38. Ozonoff, S., Pennington, B. F., & Rogers, S. J. (1991). Executive function deficits in high-functioning autistic children: Relationship to theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 32, 1081–1106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Phelps-Teraski, D., & Phelps-Gunn, T. (2007). Test of pragmatic language. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  40. Schopler, E., Brehm, S. S., Kinsbourne, M., & Reichler, R. J. (1971). Effect of treatment structure on development in autistic children. Archives of General Psychiatry, 24(5), 415–421.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Schopler, E., Van Bourgondien, M., Wellman, J., & Love, S. R. (2010). Childhood autism rating scale (2nd edn.). Torrance, CA: WPS.Google Scholar
  42. Semel, E., Wiig, E., & Secord, W. (2013). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (5th edn.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson Clinical.Google Scholar
  43. Shaw, M. L. G. (1980). On becoming a personal scientist: Interactive computer elicitation of personal models of the world. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  44. Sinha, P., Kjelgaard, M. M., Ghandi, T. K., Tsourides, K., Cardinaux, A. L., Pantazis, D., Diamond, S. P., & Held, R. M. (2014). Autism as a disorder of prediction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Washington, D. C.Google Scholar
  45. University of North Carolina Medical Center. (2014). TEACCH Autism Program. Retrieved 03 Jan 2015 from http://teacch.com/about-us/what-is-teacch.
  46. Winter, D. A. (1992). Personal construct psychology in clinical practice: Theory, research and applications. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Wesley Medical CenterWichitaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Communication Sciences & DisordersWichita State UniversityWichitaUSA

Personalised recommendations