Skip to main content
Log in

Brief Report: Theory of Mind, Relational Reasoning, and Social Responsiveness in Children With and Without Autism: Demonstration of Feasibility for a Larger-Scale Study

  • Brief Report
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Understanding the underpinnings of social responsiveness and theory of mind (ToM) will enhance our knowledge of autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We hypothesize that higher-order relational reasoning (higher-order RR: reasoning necessitating integration of relationships among multiple variables) is necessary but not sufficient for ToM, and that social responsiveness varies independently of higher-order RR. A pilot experiment tested these hypotheses in n = 17 children, 3–14, with and without ASD. No child failing 2nd-order RR passed a false belief ToM test. Contrary to prediction, Social Responsiveness Scale scores did correlate with 2nd-order RR performance, likely due to sample characteristics. It is feasible to translate this comparative cognition-inspired line of inquiry for full-scale studies of ToM, higher-order RR, and social responsiveness in ASD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Notes

  1. We do not in any way imply that there is anything less human about individuals with autism, young children, or those with intellectual disability because of limitations in certain forms of RR. Indeed, part of the supporting evidence for our work includes noting that some individuals with autism demonstrate above-average fluid reasoning. RR is only a small part of what makes all humans human.

  2. Our prediction that no child failing higher-order relational reasoning could pass False Belief was tested by assessing the exact binomial probability of n children failing higher-order relational reasoning but passing False Belief.

  3. Adjustment for unequal variances.

References

  • Andrews, G., Halford, G. S., Bunch, K. M., Bowden, D., & Jones, T. (2003). Theory of mind and relational complexity. Child Development, 74(5), 1476–1499.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21(1), 37–46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blair, C. (2006). How similar are fluid cognition and general intelligence? A developmental neuroscience perspective on fluid cognition as an aspect of human cognitive ability. Behavioral Brain Sciences, 29(2), 109–125. discussion 125–160.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, P., & German, T. P. (2000). Two reasons to abandon the false belief task as a test of theory of mind. Cognition, 77(1), B25–B31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, J. (2012). Putting theory of mind in its place: Psychological explanations of the socio-emotional-communicative impairments in autistic spectrum disorder. Autism, 16(3), 226–246. doi:10.1177/1362361311430403.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bruinsma, Y., Koegel, R. L., & Koegel, L. K. (2004). Joint attention and children with autism: A review of the literature. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 10(3), 169–175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, P. A., Just, M. A., & Shell, P. (1990). What one intelligence test measures: A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test. Psychological Review, 97(3), 404–431.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Colle, L., Baron-Cohen, S., & Hill, J. (2007). Do children with autism have a theory of mind? A non-verbal test of autism vs. specific language impairment. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(4), 716–723.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Constantino, J., & Gruber, C. (2005). Social responsiveness scale. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.

  • Constantino, J. N., & Todd, R. D. (2000). Genetic structure of reciprocal social behavior. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157(12), 2043–2045.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Crone, E. A., Wendelken, C., van Leijenhorst, L., Honomichl, R. D., Christoff, K., & Bunge, S. A. (2009). Neurocognitive development of relational reasoning. Developmental Science, 12(1), 55–66. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00743.x.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, M., Soulieres, I., Gernsbacher, M. A., & Mottron, L. (2007). The level and nature of autistic intelligence. Psychological Science, 18(8), 657–662.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, N., & Happe, F. (2005). A training study of theory of mind and executive function in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(6), 757–771. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0022-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, C. M., Riggs, K. J., & Boucher, J. (2004). Counterfactual and mental state reasoning in children with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34(2), 177–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hayashi, M., Kato, M., Igarashi, K., & Kashima, H. (2008). Superior fluid intelligence in children with Asperger’s disorder. Brain and Cognition, 66(3), 306–310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasari, C., Gulsrud, A., Freeman, S., Paparella, T., & Hellemann, G. (2012). Longitudinal follow-up of children with autism receiving targeted interventions on joint attention and play. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 51(5), 487–495. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2012.02.019.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kasari, C., Gulsrud, A. C., Wong, C., Kwon, S., & Locke, J. (2010). Randomized controlled caregiver mediated joint engagement intervention for toddlers with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 40(9), 1045–1056. doi:10.1007/s10803-010-0955-5.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kroger, J. K., Sabb, F. W., Fales, C. L., Bookheimer, S. Y., Cohen, M. S., & Holyoak, K. J. (2002). Recruitment of anterior dorsolateral prefrontal cortex in human reasoning: A parametric study of relational complexity. Cerebral Cortex, 12(5), 477–485.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H, Jr, Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism Diagnostic Interview-Revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5), 659–685.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mackey, A. P., Hill, S. S., Stone, S. I., & Bunge, S. A. (2011). Differential effects of reasoning and speed training in children. Developmental Science, 14(3), 582–590. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01005.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marrus, N., Faughn, C., Shuman, J., Petersen, S. E., Constantino, J. N., Povinelli, D. J., & Pruett, J. R, Jr. (2011). Initial description of a quantitative, cross-species (chimpanzee-human) social responsiveness measure. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 50(5), 508–518. doi:10.1016/j.jaac.2011.01.009.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, C. A., Murray, D. S., Kinsman, A., Castillo, H., Mitchell, T., Hickey, F. J., & Patterson, B. (2009). Differences in the clinical presentation of Trisomy 21 with and without autism. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 53(2), 143–151.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, E. (2007). Links between theory of mind and executive function in young children with autism: Clues to developmental primacy. Developmental Psychology, 43(4), 974–990. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.43.4.974.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pellicano, E. (2010). Individual differences in executive function and central coherence predict developmental changes in theory of mind in autism. Developmental Psychology, 46(2), 530–544. doi:10.1037/a0018287.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D. C., Holyoak, K. J., & Povinelli, D. J. (2008). Darwin’s mistake: Explaining the discontinuity between human and nonhuman minds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 31(2), 109–130. discussion 130–178.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D. C., & Povinelli, D. J. (2007). On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 731–744.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perner, J., & Leekam, S. (2008). The curious incident of the photo that was accused of being false: Issues of domain specificity in development, autism, and brain imaging. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (Colchester), 61(1), 76–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, D. J. (2012). World without weight: Perspectives on an alien mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. (2004). Psychology. Is language the key to human intelligence? [Comment]. Science, 303(5656), 318–320. doi:10.1126/science.1093993.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raven, J. C. (1958). Standard progressive matrices. Manual. New York: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richland, L. E., Chan, T. K., Morrison, R. G., & Au, T. K. (2010). Young children’s analogical reasoning across cultures: Similarities and differences. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 105(1–2), 146–153. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2009.08.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richland, L. E., Morrison, R. G., & Holyoak, K. J. (2006). Children’s development of analogical reasoning: Insights from scene analogy problems. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94(3), 249–273.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richland, L. E., Zur, O., & Holyoak, K. J. (2007). Mathematics. Cognitive supports for analogies in the mathematics classroom. Science, 316(5828), 1128–1129. doi:10.1126/science.1142103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, F. J., Baron-Cohen, S., & Leslie, A. (1999). ‘If pigs could fly’: A test of counterfactual reasoning and pretence in children with autism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 349–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent, J. L., Patel, G. H., Fox, M. D., Snyder, A. Z., Baker, J. T., Van Essen, D. C., et al. (2007). Intrinsic functional architecture in the anaesthetized monkey brain. Nature, 447(7140), 83–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Cross, D., & Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., Burack, J. A., Benedetto, E., & Frye, D. (1996). Theory of mind and rule use in individuals with Down’s syndrome: A test of the uniqueness and specificity claims. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 37(4), 479–484.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zelazo, P. D., Jacques, S., Burack, J. A., & Frye, D. (2002). The relation between theory of mind and rule use: Evidence from Persons with autism-spectrum disorders. Infant and Child Development, 11, 171–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Derek C. Penn, Keith Holyoak, John N. Constantino, Dorothy K. Grange, Lawrence McEvoy, and Victoria Sorrentino for their significant contributions to this work. Britt Gott assisted with manuscript preparation. Funding included K12 EY016336 (Pruett), JSMF Centennial Fellowship (Povinelli), and The Drs. John R. (Sr.) and Patricia O. Pruett Fund (for research in Theory of Mind and for undergraduate training).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John R. Pruett Jr..

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pruett, J.R., Kandala, S., Petersen, S.E. et al. Brief Report: Theory of Mind, Relational Reasoning, and Social Responsiveness in Children With and Without Autism: Demonstration of Feasibility for a Larger-Scale Study. J Autism Dev Disord 45, 2243–2251 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2357-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-015-2357-1

Keywords

Navigation