Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 45, Issue 5, pp 1156–1166 | Cite as

Autism Spectrum Disorders and Self-reports: Testing Validity and Reliability Using the NEO-PI-R

  • Eva Hesselmark
  • Jonna M. Eriksson
  • Joakim Westerlund
  • Susanne Bejerot
Original Paper

Abstract

Although self-reported measures are frequently used to assess adults with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), the validity of self-reports is under-researched in ASD. The core symptoms of ASD may negatively affect the psychometric properties of self-reported measures. The aim of the present study was to test the validity and reliability of self-reported data using the NEO personality inventory-revised (NEO-PI-R). Forty-eight adults with ASD and 53 controls completed the NEO-PI-R and a psychiatric interview. Results indicate satisfactory internal consistency of the NEO-PI-R, a satisfactory factor structure, predicted correlations with clinician ratings in the ASD group, and predicted differences in personality between the ASD group and controls. In conclusion, the present results support the use of self-reported measures when assessing adults with ASD .

Keywords

Autism spectrum disorders Self report Psychometrics Validation Personality tests 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors want to express their gratitude towards all participants who agreed to sign up for the study and to Dr. Sabina Bonde who assisted in some of the assessments. Technical support was provided by Christina Arlinde and Ann Lindgren. This study was supported by the St Göran Foundation, The Swedish Society of Medicine and the Thuring Foundation.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of Interest.

References

  1. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Skinner, R., Martin, J., & Clubley, E. (2001). The autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): Evidence from asperger syndrome/high-functioning autism, males and females, scientists and mathematicians. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 31(1), 5–17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Beck, A. T., Steer, R. A., Ball, R., & Ranieri, W. (1996). Comparison of beck depression inventories -IA and -II in psychiatric outpatients. Journal of Personality Assessment, 67(3), 588–597.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bejerot, S., & Eriksson, J. M. (2014). Sexuality and gender role in autism spectrum disorder: A case control study. PloS One, 9(1), e87961.Google Scholar
  5. Bejerot, S., Eriksson, J. M., Bonde, S., Carlström, K., Humble, M. B., & Eriksson, E. (2012). The extreme male brain revisited: Gender coherence in adults with autism spectrum disorder. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 201, 116–123.Google Scholar
  6. Bejerot, S., Eriksson, J. M., & Mörtberg, E. (2014). Social anxiety in adult autism spectrum disorder. Psychiatry Research. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2014.08.030.
  7. Berthoz, S., & Hill, E. L. (2005). The validity of using self-reports to assess emotion regulation abilities in adults with autism spectrum disorder. European Psychiatry : The Journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists, 20(3), 291–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.Google Scholar
  9. Costa, P., & McCrae, R. (1992). Revised NEO personality inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO five-factor inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  10. Costello, A., & Osborne, J. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 10(7), 1–9.Google Scholar
  11. Dunkley, D. M., Sanislow, C. A., Grilo, C. M., & McGlashan, T. H. (2009). Self-criticism versus neuroticism in predicting depression and psychosocial impairment for 4 years in a clinical sample. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 50(4), 335–346.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Griffin, B., Hesketh, B., & Grayson, D. (2004). Applicants faking good: Evidence of item bias in the NEO PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1545–1558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gustavsson, J. P., Asberg, M., & Schalling, D. (1997). The healthy control subject in psychiatric research: impulsiveness and volunteer bias. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 96(5), 325–328.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Hesselmark, E., Plenty, S., & Bejerot, S. (2014). Group cognitive behavioural therapy and group recreational activity for adults with autism spectrum disorders: A preliminary randomized controlled trial. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 18(6), 672–683.Google Scholar
  15. Hoekstra, R. A., Bartels, M., Cath, D. C., & Boomsma, D. I. (2008). Factor structure, reliability and criterion validity of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ): A study in Dutch population and patient groups. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38, 1555–1566.CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Ikeda, E., Hinckson, E., & Krägeloh, C. (2014). Assessment of quality of life in children and youth with autism spectrum disorder: a critical review. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 23, 1069–1085.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Källmén, H., Wennberg, P., & Bergman, H. (2011). Psychometric properties and norm data of the Swedish version of the NEO-PI-R. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 65(5), 311–314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kessler, R. C., Adler, L., Ames, M., Demler, O., Faraone, S., Hiripi, E., et al. (2005). The World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS): A short screening scale for use in the general population. Psychological Medicine, 35(2), 245–256.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, D. V., Weiller, E., Amorim, P., Bonora, I., Sheehan, K. H., et al. (1997). The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI). A short diagnostic structured interview: Reliability and validity according to the CIDI. European Psychiatry, 12(5), 224–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lord, C., Risi, S., Lambrecht, L., Cook, E. H., Leventhal, B. L., DiLavore, P. C., et al. (2000). The autism diagnostic observation schedule-generic: A standard measure of social and communication deficits associated with the spectrum of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 30(3), 205–223.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Lugnegård, T., Hallerbäck, M. U., & Gillberg, C. (2011). Psychiatric comorbidity in young adults with a clinical diagnosis of asperger syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1910–1917.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Malouff, J. M., Thorsteinsson, E. B., & Schutte, N. S. (2005). The relationship between the five-factor model of personality and symptoms of clinical disorders: A meta-analysis. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 27(2), 101–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Rundblad, G., & Annaz, D. (2010). The atypical development of metaphor and metonymy comprehension in children with autism. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 14(1), 29–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schinka, J., Kinder, B., & Kremer, T. (1997). Research validity scales for the NEO-PI-R: Development and initial validation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(1), 127–138.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Schubert, D. S. P., Patterson, M. B., Miller, F. T., & Brocco, K. J. (1984). Informed consent as a source of bias in clinical research. Psychiatry Research, 12(4), 313–320.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., et al. (1998). The Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59 Suppl 2, 22–33.Google Scholar
  28. Shipman, D., Sheldrick, R., & Perrin, E. (2011). Quality of life in adolescents with autism spectrum disorders: Reliability and validity of self-reports. Journal of Developmentaland Behavioral Pediatrics, 32(2), 85–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Steketee, G. (1996). The yale-brown obsessive compulsive scale: Interview versus self-report. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 34(8), 675–684.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Tantam, D. (2014). Adults with ASD. Current Developmental Disorders Reports, 1(1), 1–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Teunisse, J.-P., Van Der Sijde, A., & Berger, H. (2013). Clinical correlates of personality in ASD. In Poster presented at: International Meeting for Autism Research in San Sebastián, Spain.Google Scholar
  32. Wakabayashi, A., Baron-Cohen, S., & Wheelwright, S. (2006). Are autistic traits an independent personality dimension? A study of the autism-spectrum quotient (AQ) and the NEO-PI-R. Personality and Individual Differences, 41(5), 873–883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Williams, J. (2010). Test-retest reliability of self-reports of depression and anxiety among students with high functioning autism spectrum disorders. Univerity at Albany, State Univerity of New York.Google Scholar
  34. Zigmond, A. S., & Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67(6), 361–370.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Eva Hesselmark
    • 1
    • 3
  • Jonna M. Eriksson
    • 1
  • Joakim Westerlund
    • 2
  • Susanne Bejerot
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Clinical NeuroscienceKarolinska InstitutetStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Department of PsychologyStockholm UniversityStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Norra Stockholm Psykiatri/St Görans SjukhusStockholmSweden

Personalised recommendations