Advertisement

Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders

, Volume 44, Issue 8, pp 2064–2071 | Cite as

Brief Report: Generalisation of Word–Picture Relations in Children with Autism and Typically Developing Children

  • Calum Hartley
  • Melissa L. Allen
Brief Report

Abstract

We investigated whether low-functioning children with autism generalise labels from colour photographs based on sameness of shape, colour, or both. Children with autism and language-matched controls were taught novel words paired with photographs of unfamiliar objects, and then sorted pictures and objects into two buckets according to whether or not they were also referents of the newly-learned labels. Stimuli matched depicted referents on shape and/or colour. Children with autism extended labels to items that matched depicted objects on shape and colour, but also frequently generalised to items that matched on only shape or colour. Controls only generalised labels to items that matched the depicted referent’s shape. Thus, low-functioning children with autism may not understand that shape constrains symbolic word–picture–object relations.

Keywords

Autism Words Understanding pictures Generalisation Shape bias Colour 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the children and staff at Hillside Specialist School, Preston (UK), Sunny Brow Day Nursery, Kendal (UK), Castle Park School, Kendal (UK), and Burton Preschool, Burton-in-Kendal (UK).

References

  1. Anderson, D. K., Lord, C., Risi, S., DiLavore, P. S., Shulman, C., Thurm, A., et al. (2007). Patterns of growth in verbal abilities among children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 75, 594–604. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.75.4.594.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baron-Cohen, S., Baldwin, D. A., & Crowson, M. (1997). Do children with autism use the speaker’s direction of gaze strategy to crack the code of language? Child Development, 68, 48–57. doi: 10.2307/1131924.
  3. Bloom, P. (2002). Mindreading, communication and the learning of names for things. Mind and Language, 17, 37–54. doi: 10.1111/1468-0017.00188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. M., Whetton, C., & Burley, J. (1997). The British picture vocabulary scale (2nd ed.). Windsor: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  5. Frith, U., & Happé, F. (1994). Language and communication in autistic disorders. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, 346, 97–104. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Frost, L., & Bondy, A. (2002). PECS training manual. Newark, DE: Pyramid Educational Consultants.Google Scholar
  7. Hartley, C., & Allen, M. Symbolic understanding of pictures in low-functioning children with autism: The effects of iconicity and naming. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders. doi: 10.1007/s10803-013-2007-4.
  8. Joseph, R. M., & Tanaka, J. (2003). Holistic and part-based face recognition in children with autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 44, 529–542. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00142.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Klinger, L. G., & Dawson, G. (2001). Prototype formation in autism. Development and Psychopathology, 13, 111–124. doi: 10.1017/S0954579401001080.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Landau, B., Smith, L. B., & Jones, S. S. (1988). The importance of shape in early lexical learning. Cognitive Development, 3, 299–321. doi: 10.1016/0885-2014(88)90014-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lord, C., Rutter, M., DiLavore, P. C., & Risi, S. (2002). Autism diagnostic observation schedule (WPS edition). Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
  12. Lord, C., Rutter, M., & Le Couteur, A. (1994). Autism diagnostic interview-revised: A revised version of a diagnostic interview for caregivers of individuals with possible pervasive developmental disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24(5), 659–685. doi: 10.1007/BF02172145.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304–308. doi: 10.1037/h0028558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Preissler, M. A. (2008). Associative learning of pictures and words by low-functioning children with autism. Autism, 12(3), 229–246. doi: 10.1177/1362361307088753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Preissler, M. A., & Carey, S. (2004). Do both pictures and words function as symbols for 18- and 24-month-old children? Journal of Cognition and Development, 5, 185–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Roid, G. H., & Miller, L. J. (1997). Leiter international performance scale-revised. Wood Dale, IL: Stoelting.Google Scholar
  17. Samuelson, L., & Smith, L. B. (1999). Early noun vocabularies: Do ontology, category structure, and syntax correspond? Cognition, 71, 1–33. doi: 10.1016/S0010-0277(99)00034-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schopler, E., Reichler, R., DeVellis, R., & Daly, K. (1980). Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood autism rating scale (CARS). Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 10, 91–103. doi: 10.1007/BF02408436.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., Landau, B., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science, 13, 13–19. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00403.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Son, J. Y., Smith, L. B., & Goldstone, R. L. (2006). Generalizing from simple instances: An uncomplicated lesson from kids learning object categories. In Proceedings of the twenty-eighth annual conference of the cognitive science society. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  21. Tek, S., Jaffery, G., Fein, D., & Naigles, L. R. (2008). Do children with autism spectrum disorders show a shape tekbias in word learning? Autism Research, 1, 208–222. doi: 10.1002/aur.38.PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Younger, B. (1990). Infant categorization: Memory for category-level and specific item information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50, 131–155. doi: 10.1016/0022-0965(90)90036-8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyLancaster UniversityLancashireUK

Personalised recommendations