ABA Versus TEACCH: The Case for Defining and Validating Comprehensive Treatment Models in Autism
- 5.2k Downloads
The authors analyzed the results of a social validation survey to determine if autism service providers including special education teachers, parents, and administrators demonstrate a preference for the intervention components of Applied Behavior Analysis or Training and Education of Autistic and other Communication Handicapped Children. They also investigated the comprehensiveness of these treatment models for use in public school programs. The findings indicate no clear preference for either model, but a significantly higher level of social validity for components inherent in both approaches. The authors discuss the need for research to define what is meant by comprehensive programming in autism.
KeywordsSocial validation Expert validation ABA vs. TEACCH Autism treatment model
We wish to thank Julie Ray and Stacey Callaway, UNT Project STARS autism research and leadership doctoral program, for their assistance in data collection and analysis and identifying subject matter experts. We also thank Kristin Farmer, Autism Comprehensive Education Services, Inc., California, for her assistance with the expert validation process.
- Alberto, P. A., & Troutman, A. C. (2008). Applied behavior analysis for teachers (8th ed.). Columbus, OH: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
- Arick, J. R., Krug, D. A., Fullerton, A., Loos, L., & Falco, R. (2005). School-based programs. In F. R. Volkmar, R. Paul, A. Klin, & D. Cohen (Eds.), Handbook of autism and pervasive developmental disorders (pp. 1003–1028). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Gresham, F. M., Beebe-Frankenberger, M. E., & MacMillan, D. L. (1999). A selective review of treatments for children with autism: Description and methodological considerations. School Psychology Review, 28, 559–575.Google Scholar
- Gresham, F. M., Cook, C. R., Crews, S. D., & Kern, L. (2004). Social skills training for children and youth with emotional and behavioral disorders: Validity considerations and future directions. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 32–46.Google Scholar
- Horner, R. H., Carr, E. G., Halle, J., McGee, G., Odom, A., & Wolery, M. (2005). The use of single-subject research to identify evidence-based practice in special education. Exceptional Children, 71, 165–179.Google Scholar
- Howlin, P. (2005). The effectiveness of interventions for children with autism. Neurodevelopmental Disorders (pp. 101–119). Vienna: Springer.Google Scholar
- Kern, L., & Manz, P. (2004). A look at current validity issues of school-wide behavior support. Behavioral Disorders, 30, 47–59.Google Scholar
- Maurice, C., Green, G., & Luce, S. C. (Eds.). (1996). Behavioral intervention for young children with autism: A manual for parents and professionals. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
- Mesibov, G. (2001). Interview with Professor Gary Mesibov. Looking Up: The Monthly International Autism Newsletter, 2(10). Retrieved from http://www.lookingupautism.org/Articles/GaryMesibov.html.
- Mesibov, G. B., Shea, V., & Schopler, E. (2006). The TEACCH approach to autism spectrum disorders. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2001). Educating children with autism. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Odom, S., Boyd, B., Hall, L., & Hume, K. (2008). Meta-evaluation of comprehensive treatment programs for children with Autism Spectrum Disorder. Paper presented at the 4th annual international meeting for Autism research, London, England.Google Scholar
- Prizant, B. M. (2009). Is ABA the only way? Social Thinking. Retrieved from http://www.socialthinking.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=106:is-aba-the-only-way-&catid=69:published-articles&Itemid=122.
- Rimland, B. (1999). The ABA controversy. Autism Research Review International, 13(3), 3. Retrieved from http://www.autism.com/ari/editorials/ed_aba.htm.
- Schoen, A. A. (2003). What potential does the Applied Behavior Analysis approach have for the treatment of children and youth with autism? Journal of Instructional Psychology, 30, 125–129.Google Scholar
- Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., & Lansing, M. (1980). Individualized assessment and treatment for autistic and developmentally disabled children. Volume II. Teaching strategies of parents and professionals. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.Google Scholar
- Wilczynski, S. M. (2007, March). The National Standards Project: Using evidence-based practice to create environments in which individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders can succeed. Paper presented at the 4th international conference on positive behavior support, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
- Yell, M. L., Katsiyannis, A., & Shiner, J. G. (2006). The No Child Left Behind Act, adequate yearly progress, and students with disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 38(4), 32–39.Google Scholar