Human Versus Non-Human Face Processing: Evidence from Williams Syndrome
- 190 Downloads
Increased motivation towards social stimuli in Williams syndrome (WS) led us to hypothesize that a face’s human status would have greater impact than face’s orientation on WS’ face processing abilities. Twenty-nine individuals with WS were asked to categorize facial emotion expressions in real, human cartoon and non-human cartoon faces presented upright and inverted. When compared to both chronological and mental age-matched controls, WS participants were able to categorize emotions from human, but not from non-human faces. The use of different perceptual strategies to process human and non-human faces could not explain this dissociation. Rather, the findings suggest an increased sensitivity to socially relevant cues, such as human facial features, possibly related to the hallmark feature of WS—hypersociability.
KeywordsFacial expressions Cartoon faces Inversion effect Williams syndrome
We are grateful to all the participants, their parents and the Regional Williams Syndrome Associations. Andreia Santos was supported by a grant from the FCT-MCTES (Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia, Ministério Da Educação, Tecnologia e do Ensino Superior, SFRH/BD/18820/2004) to conduct this study. We are also grateful to Duncan Milne for his insightful comments on this manuscript.
- Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., & Cohen, D. J. (2000). Understanding other minds (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bellugi, U., Marks, S., Bihrle, A., & Sabo, H. (1988a). Dissociation between language and cognitive functions in Williams syndrome. In D. Bishop & K. Mogford (Eds.), Language development in exceptional circumstances (pp. 177–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bellugi, U., Sabo, H., & Vaid, J. (1988b). Spatial deficits in children with Williams syndrome. In J. Stiles-Davis, U. Kritchevshy, & U. Bellugi (Eds.), Spatial cognition: Brain bases and development (pp. 273–297). Hillsdale, New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Bellugi, U., Wang, P. P., & Jernigan, T. L. (1994). Williams syndrome: An unusual neuropsychological profile. In S. H. Broman & J. Grafman (Eds.), Atypical cognitive deficits in developmental disorders: Implications for brain function (pp. 23–56). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
- Deruelle, C., Rondan, C., Mancini, J., & Livet, M. O. (2003). Exploring face processing in Williams syndrome. Cognition, Brain and Behaviour, 7(2), 157–172.Google Scholar
- Johnson, M. H., & Morton, J. (1991). Biology and cognitive development. The case of face recognition. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Martinez, A. M., & Benavente, R. (1998). The AR Face Database. CVC Technical Report, #24 June 1998.Google Scholar
- Pober, B. R., & Dyckens, E. M. (1996). Williams syndrome: An overview of medical, cognitive, and behavioural features. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 5, 929–943.Google Scholar
- Santos, A., Milne, D., Rosset, D., & Deruelle, C. (2007). Challenging symmetry on mental retardation: Evidence from Williams syndrome. In E. B. Heinz (Ed.), Mental retardation research advances (pp. 147–174). NY: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (1996). Manual for intelligence scale for children (3rd ed.). New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
- Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler adult intelligence scale (3rd ed.). New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar