Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A Clinical Assessment Tool for Advanced Theory of Mind Performance in 5 to 12 Year Olds

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 20 February 2010

Abstract

One hundred forty typically developing 5- to 12-year-old children were assessed with a test of advanced theory of mind employing Happé’s strange stories. There was no significant difference in performance between boys and girls. The stories discriminated performance across the different ages with the lowest performance being in the younger children who nevertheless managed to achieve a third of their potential total. However, some of the individual mentalising concepts such as persuasion were too difficult for these younger children. This normative data provides a useful clinical tool to measure mentalising ability in more able children with autism spectrum disorder.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baird, G., Simonoff, E., Pickles, A., Chandler, S., Loucas, T., Meldrum, D., et al. (2006). Prevalence of disorders of the autism spectrum in a population cohort of children in south Thames: The special needs and autism project (SNAP). Lancet, 368(9531), 210–215. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(06)69041-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1989). The autistic child’s theory of mind: A case of specific developmental delay. Journal of Clinical Psychology and Psychiatry, 30, 285–298. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.1989.tb00241.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). Mind blindness—an essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge: Massachussets Institute of Technology. ISBN 0-262-02384-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brent, E., Rios, P., Happe, F., & Charman, T. (2004). Performance of children with autism spectrum disorder on advanced theory of mind tasks. Autism, 8(3), 283–299. doi:10.1177/1362361304045217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burgess, A. F., & Gutstein, S. E. (2007). Quality of life for people with autism: Raising the standard for evaluating successful outcomes. Child and Adolescent Mental Health, 12(2), 80–86. doi:10.1111/j.1475-3588.2006.00432.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpendale, J. I. M., & Lewis, C. (2004). Constructing an understanding of the mind: The development of children’s social understanding within social interaction. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27, 79–151.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, M. (2000). Language and social cognition in children with specific language impairment. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 41(5), 627–636. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00649.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, N., & Happe, F. (2005). A training study of theory of mind and executive function in children with autistic spectrum disorders. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 35(6), 757–771. doi:10.1007/s10803-005-0022-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, P. C., Happé, F., Frith, U., Baker, S. C., Dolan, R. J., Frackowiak, R. S. J., et al. (1995). Other minds in the brain: A functional imaging study of ‘theory of mind’ in story comprehension. Cognition, 57, 109–128. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(95)00692-R.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, H. L., Happé, F., Brunswick, N., Fletcher, P. C., Frith, U., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Reading the mind in cartoons and stories: An fMRI study of ‘theory of mind’ in verbal and nonverbal tasks. Neuropsychologia, 38, 11–21. doi:10.1016/S0028-3932(99)00053-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F. (1994). An advanced test of theory of mind: Understanding the story character’s thoughts and feelings by able autistic, mentally handicapped and normal children and adults. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 24, 2. doi:10.1007/BF02172093.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843–855. doi:10.2307/1131954.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Happé, F., Ehlers, S., Fletcher, P., Frith, U., Johansson, M., Gillberg, C., et al. (1996). ‘Theory of Mind’ in the brain: Evidence from a PET scan study of Asperger syndrome. NeuroReport, 8, 197–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, M. J., O’Hare, A. E., Campbell, H., Adamson, A., & McNeilage, J. (2006). Prevalence of autistic spectrum disorders in Lothian, Scotland and estimate using the capture-recapture technique. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 91(1), 16–19. doi:10.1136/adc.2004.049601.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, J. M., & Astington, J. W. (1996). Cognitive factors and family structure associated with theory of mind development in young children. Developmental Psychology, 32(1), 70–78. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.32.1.70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolliffe, T., & Baron-Cohen, S. (1999). The strange stories test: A replication with high functioning adults with autism or Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 29, 395–406. doi:10.1023/A:1023082928366.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaland, N., Möller-Nielsen, A., Callesen, K., Mortensen, E. L., Gottlieb, D., & Smith, L. (2002). A new advanced ‘test’ of theory of mind: Evidence in children and adolescents with Asperger’s syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 43(4), 517–528. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00042.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klin, A., Jones, W., Schultz, R., Volkmar, F., & Cohen, D. (2002). Defining and quantifying the social phenotype in autism. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 895–908. doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.159.6.895.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ozonoff, S., & Miller, J. N. (1995). Teaching theory of mind: A new approach to social skills training for individuals with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25, 415–433. doi:10.1007/BF02179376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C. C. (2004). Theory-of-mind development in oral deaf children with cochlear implants or conventional hearing aids. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 45(6), 1096–1106. doi:10.1111/j.1469-7610.2004.t01-1-00302.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premack, T., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 515–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2000). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (3rd ed.). London, UK: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thiemann, K. S., & Goldstein, H. (2001). Social stories, written text cues and video feedback; affects on social communication of children with autism. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 34, 425–446. doi:10.1901/jaba.2001.34-425.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wechsler, D. (2003). Wechsler intelligence scale for children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellman, H. M., Baron-Cohen, S., Caswell, R., Gomez, J. C., Swettenham, J., Toye, E., et al. (2002). Thought-bubbles help children with autism acquire an alternative to a theory of mind. Autism, 6(4), 343–363. doi:10.1177/1362361302006004003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wimmer, H., & Hartl, J. (1991). Against the Cartesian view on mind: Young children’s difficulty with own false beliefs. The British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 9(1), 125–138.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziatas, K., & Durkin, K. (1998). Belief term development in children with autism, Asperger’s syndrome, specific language impairment and normal development: Links to theory of mind development. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(5), 755–763. doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Community Child Health Endowment Fund, Royal Hospital for Sick Children Edinburgh and the Autism Research and Development Fund, Sick Kids Friends Foundation, Edinburgh.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne E. O’Hare.

Additional information

An erratum to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-010-0971-5

Appendices

Appendix 1

Twelve ‘Strange Stories’ employed in study. Happé 1994.

Lie (Dentist)

John hates going to the dentist because every time he goes to the dentist he needs a filling, and that hurts a lot. But John knows that when he has toothache, his mother always takes him to the dentist. Now John has bad toothache at the moment, but when his mother notices he is looking ill and asks him “Do you have toothache, John?”. John says “No, Mummy”.

  1. 1.

    Is it true what John says to his mother?

  2. 2.

    Why does John say this?

White Lie (Hat)

One day Aunt Jane came to visit Peter. Now Peter loves his aunt very much, but today she is wearing a new hat; a new hat which Peter thinks is very ugly indeed. Peter thinks his aunt looks silly in it, and much nicer in her old hat. But when Aunt Jane asks Peter, “How do you like my new hat?” Peter says, “Oh, it’s very nice”.

  1. 1.

    Was it true what Peter said?

  2. 2.

    Why did he say it?

Misunderstanding (Glove)

A burglar who has just robbed a shop is making his getaway. As he is running home, a policeman on his beat sees him drop his glove. He doesn’t know the man is a burglar, he just wants to tell him he dropped his glove. But when the policeman shouts out to the burglar, “Hey you, Stop!”, the burglar turns round, sees the policeman and gives himself up. He puts his hands up and admits that he did the break-in at the local shop.

  1. 1.

    Was the policeman surprised by what the burglar did?

  2. 2.

    Why did the burglar do this, when the policeman just wanted to give him back his glove?

Sarcasm (Picnic)

Sarah and Tom are going on a picnic. It is Tom’s idea, he says it is going to be a lovely sunny day for a picnic. But just as they are unpacking the food, it starts to rain and soon they are both soaked to the skin. Sarah is cross. She says “Oh yes, a lovely day for a picnic alright!”

  1. 1.

    Is it true what Sarah says?

  2. 2.

    Why does she say this?

Persuasion (Kittens)

Jill wanted to buy a kitten, so she went to see Mrs. Smith who had lots of kittens she didn’t want. Now Mrs. Smith loved the kittens and she wouldn’t do anything to harm them, though she couldn’t keep them all herself. When Jill visited she wasn’t sure she wanted one of Mrs. Smith’s kittens, since they were all males and she had wanted a female. But Mrs. Smith said, “If no one buys the kittens, I’ll just have to drown them!”

  1. 1.

    Was it true what Mrs. Smith said?

  2. 2.

    Why did Mrs. Smith say this to Jill?

Contrary Emotions (Swings)

Today, Katy wants to go on the swings in the playground. But to get to the playground she knows she has to pass old Mr. Jones house. Mr. Jones has a nasty fierce dog and every time Katy walks past the house, the dog jumps up at the gate and barks. It scares Katy awfully and she hates walking past the house because of the nasty dog. But Katy does so want to play on the swings. Katy’s mother asks her “Do you want to go out to the playground?” Katy says “No”.

  1. 1.

    Is it true what Katy says?

  2. 2.

    Why does she say she doesn’t want to go to the playground, when she so wants to go on the swings that are there?

Pretend (Banana)

Katie and Emma are playing in the house. Emma picks up a banana from the fruit bowl and holds it up to her ear. She says to Katie “Look! This banana is a telephone!”

  1. 1.

    Is it true what Emma says?

  2. 2.

    Why does Emma say this?

Joke (Haircut)

Daniel and Ian see Mrs. Thompson coming out of the hairdressers 1 day. She looks a bit funny because the hairdresser has cut her hair much too short. Daniel says to Ian, “She must have been in a fight with a lawnmower!”

  1. 1.

    Is it true what Daniel says?

  2. 2.

    Why does he say this?

Figure of Speech (Cough)

Emma has a cough. All through lunch she coughs and coughs and coughs. Father says “Poor Emma, you must have a frog in your throat!”

  1. 1.

    Is it true what Father says to Emma?

  2. 2.

    Why does he say that?

Double Bluff (Ping-Pong Bat)

Simon is a big liar. Simon’s brother Jim knows this, he knows that Simon never tells the truth! Now yesterday Simon stole Jim’s ping-pong bat and Jim knows Simon has hidden it somewhere, though he can’t find it. He’s very cross. So he finds Simon and he says “Where is my ping-pong bat? You must have hidden it either in the cupboard or under your bed, because I’ve looked everywhere else. Where is it, in the cupboard or under your bed?” Simon tells him the bat is under his bed.

  1. 1.

    Was it true what Simon told Jim?

  2. 2.

    Where will Jim look for his ping-pong bat?

  3. 3.

    Why will Jim look there for his bat?

Appearance/Reality (Santa Claus)

On Christmas Eve, Alice’s mother takes her to the big department store in town. They go to look in the toy department. In the toy department Mr. Brown, Alice’s next door neighbour, is dressed up as Santa Claus, giving out sweets to all the children. Alice thinks she recognises Mr. Brown, so she runs up to him and asks “Who are you?” Mr. Brown answers “I’m Santa Claus!”.

  1. 1.

    Is it true what Mr. Brown says?

  2. 2.

    Why does he say this?

Forget (Doll)

Yvonne is playing in the garden with her doll. She leaves her doll in the garden when her mother calls her in for lunch. While they are having lunch, it starts to rain. Yvonne’s mother asks Yvonne “Did you leave your doll in the garden?” Yvonne says “No, I brought her in with me, Mummy”.

  1. 1.

    Is it true what Yvonne says?

  2. 2.

    Why does Yvonne say this?

Appendix 2

Lie (dentist): Q2 (Table 2).

Table 2  

White lie (hat): Q2 (Table 3).

Table 3  

Misunderstanding (glove): Q2 (Table 4).

Table 4  

Sarcasm (picnic): Q2 (Table 5).

Table 5  

Persuasion (kittens): Q2 (Table 6).

Table 6  

Contrary emotion (swings): Q2 (Table 7).

Table 7  

Pretend (banana): Q2 (Table 8).

Table 8  

Joke (haircut): Q2 (Table 9).

Table 9  

Figure of speech (cough): Q2 (Table 10).

Table 10  

Double bluff (ping-pong bat): Q2, in the cupboard (Table 11).

Table 11  

Appearance/reality (Santa Claus): Q2 (Table 12).

Table 12  

Forget (doll): Q2 (Table 13).

Table 13  

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Hare, A.E., Bremner, L., Nash, M. et al. A Clinical Assessment Tool for Advanced Theory of Mind Performance in 5 to 12 Year Olds. J Autism Dev Disord 39, 916–928 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0699-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10803-009-0699-2

Keywords

Navigation