Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology

, Volume 36, Issue 1, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Does Executive Function Matter for Preschoolers’ Problem Behaviors?

  • Claire Hughes
  • Rosie Ensor
Original Paper


Early problem behaviors are associated with a variety of cognitive deficits: in verbal ability, executive function (EF) and theory of mind (ToM). Previous studies with different age-groups yield contrasting results: for 2-year-olds, ToM skills appear particularly salient (Hughes & Ensor, 2006), but for 4-year-olds EF appears more important (Hughes, White, Sharpen, & Dunn, 2000). To examine this apparent developmental change in the relative salience of cognitive deficits we followed 122 children from Hughes and Ensor’s (2006) sample at ages 3 and 4. Tests of ToM, EF and verbal ability were included at each time-point and multi-informant, multi-measure, multi-setting ratings provided aggregate measures of problem behaviors. ToM and verbal ability showed non-specific associations with problem behaviors, but associations between EF and problem behaviors were strong and specific. In addition, age-3 EF mediated relations between age-2 verbal ability and age-4 problem behaviors.


Executive function Problem behaviors Longitudinal Theory of mind 



Executive function


Theory of mind



This research was funded by a grant to the first author from the Health Foundation (543/1808). We thank the families who participated in the Toddlers Up study.


  1. Aguilar, B., Sroufe, L. A., Egeland, B., & Carlson, E. (2000). Distinguishing the life-course persistent and adolescent-limited antisocial behaviour types: From birth to 16 years. Development and Psychopathology, 12, 109–132.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Balas, V. (2003). Drôles de plats!. Paris: Nathan.Google Scholar
  3. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A., & Frith, U. (1985). Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition, 21, 37–46.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bayley, N. (1993). Bayley scales of infant development (2nd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, Harcourt Brace & Company.Google Scholar
  5. Beck, A. T., Ward, C. H., Mendelson, M., Mock, J., & Erbaugh, J. (1961). An inventory for measuring depression. Archives of General Psychiatry, 4, 561–571.Google Scholar
  6. Berk, L. (1999). Children’s private speech: An overview of theory and the status of research. In P. Lloyd & C. Fernyhough (Eds.), Lev vygotsky: Critical assessments: Thought and language (vol. II, pp. 33–70). Florence, KY, USA: Taylor & Frances/Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Carlson, S., & Moses, L. (2001). Individual differences in inhibitory control and children’s theory of mind. Child Development, 72, 1032–1053.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carlson, S., Moses, L., & Breton, C. (2002). How specific is the relation between executive function and theory of mind? Contributions of inhibitory control and working memory. Infant and Child Development, Special Issue on Executive Functions and Development, 11, 73–92.Google Scholar
  9. Charman, A., Carroll, F., & Sturge, C. (2001). Theory of mind, executive function and social competence in boys with ADHD. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 6, 31–49.Google Scholar
  10. Coldwell, J., Pike, A., & Dunn, J. (2006). Household chaos–links with parenting and child behaviour. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 1116–1122.Google Scholar
  11. Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group. (1999). Initial impact of the fast track prevention trial for conduct problems: I. The high-risk sample. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 67, 631–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Crnic, K., & Greenberg, M. T. (1990). Minor parenting stresses with young children. Child Development, 61, 1628–1637.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Deater-Deckard, K., Pylas, M., & Petrill, S. (1997). Parent-child interactive system (PARCHISY). London.Google Scholar
  14. Dunn, L., Dunn, L., Whetton, C., & Pintillie, D. (1982). British picture vocabulary scale. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  15. Elliott, C., Murray, D., & Pearson, L. (1983). British abilities scales. Windsor, UK: NFER-Nelson.Google Scholar
  16. Fergusson, D., & Horwood, L. (1998). Early conduct problems and later life opportunities. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 1097–1108.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fergusson, D., & Lynskey, M. (1998). Conduct problems in childhood and psychosocial outcomes in young adulthood: A prospective study. Journal of Emotional and Behavioural Disorders, 6, 2–18.Google Scholar
  18. Frith, C., & Frith, U. (2001). The physiological basic of theory of mind: Functional neuroimagining studies. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspective from developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 334–356). Second Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Frye, D., Zelazo, P. D., & Palfai, T. (1995). Theory of mind and rule-based reasoning. Cognitive Development, 10, 483–527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Goodman, R. (1997). The strengths and difficulties questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581–586.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goodman, R., Ford, T., Simmons, H., Gatward, R., & Meltzer, H. (2000). Using the strengths and difficulties questionnaire (SDQ) to screen for child psychiatric disorders in a community sample. British Journal of Psychiatry, 177, 534–539.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gresham, F., & Elliott, S. (1990). Social skills rating system. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
  23. Gurd, J., & Marshall, J. (2003). Dissociations: Double or quits. Cortex, 39, 192–195.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Happé, F. (1995). The role of age and verbal ability in the theory of mind task performance of subjects with autism. Child Development, 66, 843–855.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Happé, F., & Frith, U. (1996). Theory of mind and social impairment in children with conduct disorder. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 14, 385–398.Google Scholar
  26. Hay, D., Pawlby, S., Sharp, D., Schmuecker, G., Mills, A., Allen, H., et al. (1999). Parents’ judgments about young children’s problems: Why mothers and fathers might disagree yet still predict later outcomes. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 40, 1249–1258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hughes, C. (1998a). Executive function in preschoolers: Links with theory of mind and verbal ability. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 16, 233–253.Google Scholar
  28. Hughes, C. (1998b). Finding your marbles: Does preschoolers’ strategic behaviour predict later understanding of mind? Developmental Psychology, 34, 1326–1339.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hughes, C., & Dunn, J. (1997). “Pretend you didn’t know”: Preschoolers’ talk about mental states in pretend play. Cognitive Development, 12, 477–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hughes, C., & Dunn, J. (2000). Hedonism or empathy?: Hard-to-manage children’s moral awareness, and links with cognitive and maternal characteristics. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 18, 227–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hughes, C., Dunn, J., & White, A. (1998). Trick or treat?: Uneven understanding of mind and emotion and executive function among “hard to manage” preschoolers. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 981–994.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2005). Theory of mind and executive function in 2-year-olds: A family affair? Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 645–668.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (2006). Behavioural problems in two-year-olds: Links with individual differences in theory of mind, executive function and negative parenting. Journal of Child Psychology & Psychiatry, 47, 488–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (submitted-a). Positive and protective: Effects of early theory of mind on preschool problem behaviours.Google Scholar
  35. Hughes, C., & Ensor, R. (submitted-b). Theory of mind and executive function: Reciprocal relations from 2 to 4.Google Scholar
  36. Hughes, C., White, A., Sharpen, J., & Dunn, J. (2000). Antisocial, angry and unsympathetic: ‘Hard to manage’ preschoolers’ peer problems, and possible social and cognitive influences. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 41, 169–179.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Johnston, C., & Mash, E. J. (1989). A measure of parenting satisfaction and efficacy. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 18, 167–175.Google Scholar
  38. Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  39. Luria, A. R. (1973). The working brain: An introduction to neuropsychology. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  40. Mannuzza, S., Klein, R. G., Bessler, A., Malloy, P., & LaPadula, M. (1993). Adult outcome of hyperactive boys: Educational achievement, occupational rank, and psychiatric status. Archives of General Psychiatry, 50, 565–576.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Mannuzza, S., Klein, R. G., Bonagura, N., Malloy, P., Giampino, T. L., & Addalli, K. A. (1991). Hyperactive boys almost grown up: V. Replication of psychiatric status. Archives of General Psychiatry, 48, 77–83.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. McNeil, C. B., Eyberg, S., Eisenstadt, T. H., Newcomb, K., & Funderburk, B. (1991). Parent-child interaction therapy with behavior problem children: Generalization of treatment effects to the school setting. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 20, 140– 151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Meltzoff, A. N. (1999). Elements of a developmental theory of imitation. In A. N. Meltzoff & W. Prinz (Eds.), The imitative mind: Development, evolution, and brain bases (pp. 19–41). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Mesman, J., Bongers, I., & Koot, H. (2001). Preschool developmental pathways to preadolescent internalizing and externalizing problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 679–689.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mezzacappa, E. (2004). Alerting, orienting, and executive attention: Developmental properties and sociodemographic correlates in an epidemiological sample of young, urban children. Child Development, 75, 1373–1386.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Moerbeek, K. (1994). Can’t sleep. London: Western Publishing Company.Google Scholar
  47. Moffitt, T. (1990). Juvenile delinquency and attention deficit disorder: Boys’ developmental trajectories from age 3 to age 15. Child Development, 61, 893–910.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Moffitt, T. (1993). The neuropsychology of conduct disorder. Development & Psychopathology, 5, 135–152.Google Scholar
  49. Moffitt, T., & the E-Risk Study Team. (2002). Contemporary teen aged mothers in Britain. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 43, 727–742.Google Scholar
  50. Nelson, J. R., Martella, R. M., Marchand-Martella, N. (2002). Maximizing student learning: The effects of a comprehensive school-based program for preventing problem behaviors. Journal of Emotional & Behavioral Disorders, 10(3), 136–148. Google Scholar
  51. Noble, K., Norman, M. F., & Farah, M. (2005). Neurocognitive correlates of socioeconomic status in kindergarten children. Developmental Science, 8, 74–87.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pennington, B., & Bennetto, L. (1993). Main effects or transactions in the neuropsychology of conduct disorder. A commentary on the neuropsychology of conduct disorder. Development and Psychopathology, 5, 153–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perner, J., Kain, W., & Barchfield, P. (2002). Executive control and higher-order theory of mind in children at risk of ADHD. Infant and Child Development, Special Issue on Executive Functions and Development, 11, 141–158.Google Scholar
  54. Perner, J., & Lang, B. (1999). Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 337–344.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Peterson, C., & Siegal, M. (1995). Deafness, conversation and theory of mind. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 36, 459–474.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Peterson, C., & Slaughter, V. (2006). Telling the story of ToM: Deaf and hearing children’s narratives and mental state understanding. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24, 151–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Preacher, K., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 36, 717–731.Google Scholar
  58. Preacher, K., & Hayes, A. (submitted). SPSS and SAS Macros for estimating and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models.Google Scholar
  59. Preacher, K., & Leonardelli, G. (2001). Calculation for the Sobel Test. An interactive calculation tool for mediation tests. Retrieved Friday 26th March, 2004, from∼preacher/ sobel/sobel.htm.Google Scholar
  60. Robison, L. M., Sclar, D. A., Skaer, T. L., & Galin, R. S. (1999). National trends in the prevalence of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and the prescribing of methylphenidate among school-age children. Clinical Pediatrics, 38, 209–217.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Rutter, M., & Quinton, D. (1984). Parental psychiatric disorder: Effects on children. Psychological Medicine, 14, 853–880.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Saxe, R., Carey, S., & Kanwisher, N. (2004). Understanding other minds: Linking developmental psychology and functional neuroimaging. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 87–124.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Seguin, J. R., Boulerice, B., Harden, P. W., Tremblay, R. E., & Pihl, R. O. (1999). Executive functions and physical aggression after controlling for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, general memory and IQ. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 1197–1208.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments in planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B298, 199– 209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Speltz, M., Deklyen, M., Calderon, R., Greenberg, M., & Fisher, P. (1999). Neuropsychological characteristics and test behaviors of boys with early onset conduct problems. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 315–325.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Sutton, J., Smith, P., & Swettenham, J. (1999a). Bullying and “theory of mind’: A critique of the “social skills deficit’ view of anti-social behaviour. Social Development, 8, 117–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sutton, J., Smith, P., & Swettenham, J. (1999b). Social cognition and bullying: Social inadequacy or skilled manipulation? British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 17, 435–450.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tager-Flusberg, H. (2001). Language and understanding minds: Connections in autism. In S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, & D. J. Cohen (Eds.), Understanding other minds: Perspective from developmental cognitive neuroscience (pp. 334–356). Second Edition. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  70. Thorndike, R. L., Hagen, E. P., & Sattler, J. M. (1986). Stanford-binet intelligence scales. Chicago, IL: Riverside Publishing Co.Google Scholar
  71. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Wimmer, H., & Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13, 103–128.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Winsler, A., Diaz, R. M., McCarthy, E. M., Atencio, D. J., & Chabay, L. A. (1999). Mother-child interaction, private speech, and task performance in preschool children with behaviour problems. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40, 891–904.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Wood, D. (1998). How children think and learn (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
  75. Yeung, J., Linver, M. R., & Brooks-Gunn, J. (2002). How money matters for young children’s development: Parental investment and family processes. Child Development, 73, 1861–1879.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Zelazo, P., & Frye, D. (1997). Cognitive complexity and control: A theory of the development of deliberate reasoning and intentional action. In M. Stamenov (Ed.), Language structure, discourse, and the access to consciousness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Family ResearchUniversity of CambridgeCambridgeUK

Personalised recommendations