Skip to main content
Log in

Electroremediation of sodium bentonite contaminated with phenanthrene and its modeling with a Nernst-Planck equation

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the removal of PAHs from a clay-based soil, using electrokinetic remediation, was explored. The experiments used phenanthrene-spiked bentonite as a simplified model representative of a Vertisol soil polluted by hydrocarbons. Experiments were performed using a 1-D cell where 80 cm3 of phenanthrene-spiked bentonite was subjected to electrokinetic remediation using a constant current density. The results obtained from these experiments were compared with those predicted by a mathematical model based on a Nernst-Plank equation for the description of electromigration, electroosmosis and diffusion. Although significant electro-osmotic flow was observed, comparison between the experimental and predicted results indicated that the removal of phenanthrene was experimentally faster than predicted by the model. The greatest differences were found in the soil regions closer to the anode. To account for this behavior a first-order reaction in the aqueous phase in the regions closer to the anode was postulated and introduced into the model as the observed sink for phenanthrene. Under these conditions, much better agreement was observed between the experimental and model results.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Volke T, Velasco J (2004) Tecnologías de remediación de suelos. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Mexico

    Google Scholar 

  2. Reddy R, Saicheck E (2004) Enhanced electrokinetic removal of phenantrene from clay soil by periodic electric potential application. J Environ Sci Health A39(5):1189–1212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ribeiro A, Rodríguez-Maroto J, Mateus EP, Gomes H (2005) Removal of organic contaminants from soils by an electrokinetic process. The case of atrazine. Chemosphere 59:1229–1239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ribeiro A, Mateus E, Rodríguez-Maroto J (2011) Removal of organic contaminants from soils by an electrokinetic process. The case of molinate and bentazone. Sep Purif Technol 79(2):193–203

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Vieira dos Santos E, Souza F, Saez C, Cañizares P, Lanza MRV, Martinez-Huitle CA, Rodrigo MA (2016) Application of electrokinetic soil flushing to four herbicides: a comparison. Chemosphere 153:205–211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia-Gutierrez M, Gomez-Lahoz C, Rodriguez-Maroto JM, Vererda-Alonso C, García-Herruzo F (2007) Electrokinetic remediation of a soil contaminated by the pyritic sludge spill of Aznalcollar (SW, Spain). Electrochim Acta 52(10):3372–3379

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson D, Rodriguez-Maroto JM, Gomez-Lahoz C (1995) Electrokinetic remediation II. Amphoteric metals and enhancement with a weak acid. Sep Sci Technol 30(16):3111–3128

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddy K, Cameselle C (2009) Electrochemical remediation technologies for polluted soils, sediments and groundwater. Wiley, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Lima T, Ottosen LM, Heister K, Gustav JP (2012) Assesing PAH removal from clayey soil by means of electroosmosis and electrodialysis. Sci Total Environ 435(436):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. López-Vizcaino R, Alonso J, Cañizares P, León MJ, Navarro V, Rodrigo MA, Sáez C (2014) Electroremediation of natural soil polluted with phenantrene in a pilot plant. J Hazard Mater 265:142–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Alcantara MT (2008) Electrochemical remediation of phenantrene from contaminated kaolinite. Environ Geochem Health 30:89–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Harvey RG (1991) Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: chemistry and carcinogenicity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  13. Laflame R, Hites RA (1978) The global distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in recent sediments. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 42:289–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Arzayus K, Canuel E (2001) Fate of atmospherically deposited polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in Chesapeake Bay. Environ Sci Technol 35:2178–2183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Pedersen K, Lejon T, Jensen P, Ottosen L (2017) Simultaneous electrodialytic removal of PAH, PCB. J Environ Manag 198:192–202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tian Y, Boulange-Lecomte C, Benamar A, Giusti-Petrucciani N, Duflot A, Olivier S, Frederick (2017) Application of a crustacean bioassay to evaluate a multicontaminated. Sci Total Environ 607:944–953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kuppusamy S, Thavamani P, Venkateswarlu K, Lee Y, Naidu R, Megharaj M (2017) Remediation approaches for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) contaminated soils: technological constraints, emerging trends and future directions. Chemosphere 168:944–968

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Méndez-Albores E (2012) Estudio de la interacción suelo-hidrocarburo durante un proceso de electroremediación. CIDETEQ, Querétaro

    Google Scholar 

  19. Dabestani R, Ivanov IN (2009) A compilation of physical, spectroscopic and photophysical properties of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Photochem Photobiol 70(1):10–34

    Google Scholar 

  20. Acar B, Alshawabkeh NA (1993) Principles of electrokinetic remediation. Environ Sci Technol 27(13):2638–2647

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. García-Melo J (2011) Construcción del modelo de partición de fenantreno en montmorillonita antes y después del proceso de electroremediación en condiciones básicas. CIDETEQ, Querétaro

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paz-García JM, Baek K, Alshawabkeh ID, Alshawabkeh A (2012) A generalized model for trasnport of contaminants in soil by electric fields. J Environ Sci Health 47:308–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Paz-García JM, Johannesson B, Ottosen LM, Ribeiro AB, Rodríguez-Maroto JM (2013) Simulation-based analysis of the differences in the removal rate of chlorides, nitrates and sulfates by electrokinetic desalination treatments. Electrochim Acta 89:436–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Shapiro A, Probstein R (1993) Removal of contaminants from saturated Caly by electroosmosis. Environ Sci Technol 27(2):283–291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lindgren E, Mattson E, Kosak M (1994) Electrokinetic remediation of unsaturated soils. Am Chem Soc Ser 554:33–50

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Laursen S (1997) Laboratory investigation of electroosmosis in bentonites and natural clays. Can Geotec J 43:664–671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Villen-Guzman M, García-Rubio A, Paz-García JM, Rodriguez-Maroto JM, Garcia-Herruzo F, Vereda-Alonso C, Gomez-Lahoz C (2015) The use of ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid as enhancing agent for the remediation of a lead polluted soil. Electrochim Acta 181:82–89

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Vane L, Zang GM (1997) Effect of aqueous phase properties on clay particle zeta potential and electroosmotic permeability: implications for electrokinetic soil remediation processes. J Hazard Mater 55:1–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kaya A, Yukselen Y (2005) Zeta potential of soils with surfactants and its relevance to electrokinetic remediation. J Hazard Mater B120:119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmad KS (2017) Green electrokinetic remediation of thiabendazole adsorbed soils. Agrochimica 61(3):190–205

    Google Scholar 

  31. Pazos M, Ricart MT, Sanroman MA, Cameselle C (2007) Enhanced electrokinetic remediation of polluted kaolinite with an azo dye. Electrochim Acta 52:3393–3398

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support received to develop this research from the National Council of Science and Technology of Mexico (CONACyT) and the assistance of Richard Lindeke, PhD, Professor Emeritus, University of Minnesota Duluth and U.S. Peace Corps Volunteer, CIATEC, Leon, Mexico, for his revision of English in this manuscript. Maribel Pérez-Corona would also like to thank CONACyT for the grant received to accomplish his doctoral degree at CIDETEQ and the grant for international mobility, as well as the University of Malaga (Spain) for the facilities provided during this project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Bustos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pérez-Corona, M., Rodríguez-Maroto, J.M., Gómez-Lahoz, C. et al. Electroremediation of sodium bentonite contaminated with phenanthrene and its modeling with a Nernst-Planck equation. J Appl Electrochem 48, 1373–1380 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-018-1219-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-018-1219-x

Keywords

Navigation