Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 48, Issue 4, pp 463–469 | Cite as

A study on the effect of inter-electrode gap and pulse voltage on current density in electrochemical additive manufacturing

Research Article
  • 93 Downloads

Abstract

Electrochemical Additive Manufacturing—a novel non-thermal metal additive manufacturing process offers some advantages over traditional energy beam-based layered manufacturing processes, which have several inherent limitations such as thermal damages, residual stress, and part size restrictions. In this process, the principle of localized electrochemical deposition of metals is combined with the additive manufacturing procedure to manufacture metal parts at room temperature directly from computer-aided design files. The focus of research work presented in this paper is on the modeling of the current density produced in the electrochemical deposition system based on the Fick’s law of diffusion and electrode kinetics using the Butler–Volmer equation. The current densities involved in the micro-electrochemical additive manufacturing on nickel have been found to be several orders of magnitude higher than the standard electroplating studies, making it a very high overpotential deposition. The model developed in this work was used to study the effects of applied potential, pulse duty cycle, inter-electrode gap, and concentration on the current density and the transient diffusion layer thickness. The model predicted that lower inter-electrode gaps facilitated higher current density leading to faster deposition rates. The pulse voltage was found to produce higher current densities during the pulse-on time. The modeled current density values were validated with experimental results using the in-house-built electrochemical additive manufacturing setup.

Graphical Abstract

Keywords

Pulse electrodeposition model Electrochemical additive manufacturing Inter-electrode gap High current density nickel deposition 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant Nos. CMMI-1400800 and CMMI-1454181.

References

  1. 1.
    ASTM-52900-15 (2015) Standard terminology for additive manufacturing—general principles—terminology. ASTM International.  https://doi.org/10.1520/ISOASTM52900-15
  2. 2.
    Schmidt M, Merklein M, Bourell D, Dimitrov D, Hausotte T, Wegener K, Overmeyer L, Vollertsen F, Levy GN (2017) Laser based additive manufacturing in industry and academia. CIRP Ann.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.011 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vaezi M, Seitz H, Yang S (2012) A review on 3D micro-additive manufacturing technologies. Int J Adv Manuf Technol.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4605-2 Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sundaram M, Kamaraj A, Kumar V (2015) Mask-less electrochemical additive manufacturing: a feasibility study. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4029022 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Madden J, Hunter I (1996) Three-dimensional microfabrication by localized electrochemical deposition. J Microelectromech Syst 5(1):24–32.  https://doi.org/10.1109/84.485212 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    El-Giar E, Said R, Bridges G, Thomson D (2000) Localized electrochemical deposition of copper microstructures. J Electrochem Soc 147(2):586–591.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393237 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lin C, Lee C, Yang J, Huang Y (2005) Improved copper microcolumn fabricated by localized electrochemical deposition. Electrochem Solid State Lett 8(9):C125–C129.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1999911 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lin J, Chang T, Yang J, Chen Y, Chuang C (2010) Localized electrochemical deposition of micrometer copper columns by pulse plating. Electrochim Acta 55(6):1888–1894.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2009.11.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Jansson A, Thornell G, Johansson S (2000) High resolution 3D microstructures made by localized electrodeposition of nickel. J Electrochem Soc 147(5):1810–1817.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1393439 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Schindler W, Hofmann D, Kirschner J (2001) Localized electrodeposition using a scanning tunneling microscope tip as a nanoelectrode. J Electrochem Soc 148(2):C124-C130.  https://doi.org/10.1149/1.1343107 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lin J, Chang T, Yang J, Jeng J, Lee D, Jiang S (2009) Fabrication of a micrometer Ni-Cu alloy column coupled with a Cu micro-column for thermal measurement. J Micromech Microeng.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/19/1/015030 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pellicer E, Pane S, Panagiotopoulou V, Fusco S, Sivaraman K, Surinach S, Baro M, Nelson B, Sort J (2012) Localized electrochemical deposition of porous Cu-Ni microcolumns: insights into the growth mechanisms and the mechanical performance. Int J Electrochem Sci 7(5):4014–4029Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Braun T, Schwartz D (2015) Localized electrodeposition and patterning using bipolar electrochemistry. J Electrochem Soc 162(4):D180–D185.  https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1031504jes CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Choo RTC, Toguri JM, El-Sherik AM, Erb U (1995) Mass transfer and electrocrystallization analyses of nanocrystalline nickel production by pulse plating. J Appl Electrochem 25(4):384–403.  https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00249659 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Popov K, Keča D, Vidojković S, Lazarević B, Milojković V (1976) Mathematical model and digital simulation of pulsating overpotential copper electrodeposition. J Appl Electrochem 6(4):365–370CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scharf I, Sieber M, Lampke T (2014) Calculation approach for current-potential behaviour during pulse electrodeposition based on double-layer characteristics. Trans Inst Met Finish 92(6):325–335.  https://doi.org/10.1179/0020296714z.000000000205 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saraby-Reintjes A, Fleischmann M (1984) Kinetics of electrodeposition of nickel from watts baths. Electrochim Acta 29(4):557–566.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0013-4686(84)87109-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Lantelme F, Seghiouer A, Derja A (1998) Model of nickel electrodeposition from acidic medium. J Appl Electrochem 28(9):907–913.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1003404118601 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang F, Wang F, He H (2016) Parametric electrochemical deposition of controllable morphology of copper micro-columns. J Electrochem Soc 163(10):E322–E327.  https://doi.org/10.1149/2.1191610jes Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Brant AM, Sundaram MM, Kamaraj AB (2015) Finite element simulation of localized electrochemical deposition for maskless electrochemical additive manufacturing. J Manuf Sci Eng 137(1):011018–011018.  https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4028198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kamaraj A, Lewis S, Sundaram M (2016) Numerical study of localized electrochemical deposition for micro electrochemical additive manufacturing. Proced CIRP 42:788–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Skeel R, Berzins M (1990) A method for the spatial discretization of parabolic equations in one space variable. SIAM J Sci Stat Comput 11(1):1–32.  https://doi.org/10.1137/0911001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cui CQ, Lee JY (1994) Effects of oxygen reduction on nickel deposition from unbuffered aqueous solutions: I. Deposition process and deposit structure. J Electrochem Soc 141(8):2030–2035CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ibrahim MAM (2006) Black nickel electrodeposition from a modified Watts bath. J Appl Electrochem 36(3):295–301.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-005-9077-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Haghdoost A, Pitchumani R (2011) Numerical analysis of electrodeposition in microcavities. Electrochim Acta 56(24):8260–8271.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2011.06.084 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kim S-M, Jin S-H, Lee Y-J, Lee MH (2017) Design of nickel electrodes by electrodeposition: effect of internal stress on hydrogen evolution reaction in alkaline solutions. Electrochim Acta 252(Supplement C):67–75.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2017.08.157 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Oldham KB, Myland JC, Bond AM (2011) Transport. In: Electrochemical science and technology. Wiley, Chichester, pp 145–170.  https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119965992.ch8
  28. 28.
    Ibl N (1980) Some theoretical aspects of pulse electrolysis. Surf Technol 10(2):81–104.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0376-4583(80)90056-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical and Materials EngineeringUniversity of CincinnatiCincinnatiUSA

Personalised recommendations