Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 44, Issue 4, pp 523–532 | Cite as

Hybrid battery-supercapacitor storage for an electric forklift: a life-cycle cost assessment

Research Article


Supercapacitors, more properly named electrochemical capacitors (EC), have a great potential in constituting the premium power reserve in a variety of energy- and power-intensive applications in transport and in electricity grids. EC may be used in conjunction with electrochemical storage systems, such as the batteries of various chemistries (lead-acid, sodium-nickel chloride or sodium-sulphur, nickel-metal hydride and even lithium-based systems), in a hybrid configuration where the functions of energy and power can be conveniently separated between the two storage devices and then optimized. Recently, an electric forklift has been commercialized with such a hybrid storage system, without any demonstrated specification of the advantages achievable with this configuration. In this article, the effective technical and economical benefits of this EC integration are theoretically and experimentally evaluated, by means of a conventional electric forklift. The reference vehicle drivetrain is modified by combining a conventional traction lead-acid battery, already used in the vehicle, and a commercial EC. The performances of the modified electric forklift are simulated with already developed vehicle and components models and validated with experimental data. Simulations and electrical tests confirm the functional relationship, expressed in exponential form, between battery lifetime and peak current and demonstrate the technical and economical potentialities of the use of these hybrid configurations, such as the increased efficiency and the prolonged battery life (more than doubling the life of the battery without EC), due to the reduced battery operating stress, and an economical saving (about 30 %), able to compensate initial extra-costs for vehicle modification and battery replacement.


Electric forklift Hybrid energy storage systems Lead-acid battery Supercapacitors Modelling Life-cycle cost assessment 



This work is a part of activities supported by the Italian Ministry of Economic Development in the framework of the Program Agreement for the Research on Electric System.


  1. 1.
    Conte M, Pasquali M (2009) Impact of innovative ILHYPOS supercapacitors on a fuel cell vehicle, international electric vehicle symposium EVS-24. Stavanger, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Conte M (2010) Supercapacitors technical requirements for new applications. Fuel Cells 10:806–818. doi: 10.1002/fuce.201000087 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Conte M, Pede G, Rossi E, Vellucci F (2010) Supercapacitors research and applications at ENEA, ESSCAP2010. Bordeaux, FranceGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chiodo E, Lauria D, Pagano M, Pede G, Vellucci F (2013) Experimental performances and life cycle estimation of hybrid electric storage systems, IEEE International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP 2013)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kuperman Alon, Aharon Ilan (2011) Battery-ultracapacitor hybrids for pulsed current loads: A review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:981–992CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Burke A (2007) R&D considerations for the performance and application of electrochemical capacitors. Electrochim Acta 53:1083–1091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cericola D, Kötz R (2012) Hybridization of rechargeable batteries and electrochemical capacitors: principles and limits. Electrochim Acta 72:1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sharma P, Bhatti TS (2010) A review on electrochemical double-layer capacitors. Energy Convers Manag 51:2901–2912CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Van Mierlo J, Van den Bossche P, Maggetto G (2004) Models of energy sources for EV and HEV: fuel cells, batteries, ultracapacitors, flywheels and engine-generators. J Power Sources 128:76–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marie-Francoise JN, Gualous H, Outbib R, Berthon A (2005) 42 V power net with supercapacitor and battery for automotive applications. J Power Sources 143:275–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ashtiani C, Wright R, Hunt G (2006) Ultracapacitors for automotive applications. J Power Sources 154:561–566CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rafika F, Gualous H, Gallay R, Crausaz R, Berthon A (2007) Frequency, thermal and voltage supercapacitors characterization and modeling. J Power Sources 165:928–934CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lajnef W, Vinassa J-M, Briat O, Azzopardi S, Woirgard E (2007) Characterization methods and modelling of ultracapacitors for use as peak power sources. J Power Sources 168:553–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Burke A, Miller M (2011) The power capability of ultracapacitors and lithium batteries for electric and hybrid vehicle applications. J Power Sources 196:514–522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Al Sakka M, Gualous H, Omar N, Van Mierlo J (2012) Batteries and supercapacitors for electric vehicles. In: Stevic G (ed) New generation of electric vehicles. InTech, Rijeka, pp 135–164Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bubna P, Advani SG, Prasad Ajay K (2012) Integration of batteries with ultracapacitors for a fuel cell hybrid transit bus. J Power Sources 199:360–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sglavo V, Vellucci F (2012) Prova vita di batterie piombo acido, con e senza livellamento del carico, ENEA Public Report (in Italian), RdS/2012/121Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Tironi E, Musolino V (2009) Supercapacitor characterization in power electronic applications: proposal of a new model, IEEE International Conference on Clean Electrical Power (ICCEP 2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ceraolo M (2000) New dynamical models of lead-acid batteries. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(4):1184–1190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Barsali S, Pasquali M, Pede G (2002) Definition of an energy management technique for series hybrid vehicle. International Electric Vehicle Symposium EVS-19, Busan, South KoreaGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bertoluzzo M, Buja G, Pede G, A. Puccetti A (2011) Hybrid battery-supercapacitor storage system for electric city cars. European Electric Vehicle Conference (EEVC) Brussels, BelgiumGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tironi E, Piegari L, Musolino V, Grillo S (2011) Indagine di fattibilità tecnico-economica di un accumulo misto per usi di trazione, ENEA Public Report (in Italian)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Thounthong P, Rael S, Davat B (2006) Control strategy of fuel cell/supercapacitors hybrid power sources for electric vehicle. J Power Sources 158:806–814CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. Conte
    • 1
  • A. Genovese
    • 1
  • F. Ortenzi
    • 1
  • F. Vellucci
    • 1
  1. 1.Italian National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA)RomeItaly

Personalised recommendations