Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

, Volume 35, Issue 9, pp 837–843 | Cite as

Correlation between accelerated corrosion tests and atmospheric corrosion tests on steel

  • Chuen-Chang Lin
  • Chi-Xiang Wang


Three kinds of steel [soft steel (SPHC), carbon steel (SS400), and weathered steel (A588)] were prepared for accelerated corrosion and atmospheric corrosion tests. The results of atmospheric corrosion tests were similar to those of accelerated corrosion tests. A correlation was developed for prediction of atmospheric corrosion rates of steel using atmospheric corrosion factors (i.e. Cl deposition fluxes, time of wetness, and temperatures). The comparisons between predicted and measured thickness losses due to atmospheric corrosion showed an average error of 31.6%. In addition, Tafel plots were employed to evaluate the corrosion behaviour of the three kinds of steel. The morphology of the cross-sections of specimens exposed outdoors was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results of the Tafel extrapolation tests and SEM observations of the surface morphology were similar to those seen in the atmospheric corrosion tests.

Key words:

accelerated corrosion atmospheric corrosion sodium chloride steel 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    ISO 9223, ‘Corrosion of Metal and Alloys – Classification of Corrosivity of Atmospheres’Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    ASTM G50-76, ‘Standard Recommended Practice for Conducting Atmospheric Corrosion Tests on Metals’Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    A. Philip and P.E. Schweitzer, ‘Corrosion and Corrosion Protection Handbook’, 2nd ed. (Marcel Dekker Inc., Atmospheric Corrosion Tests on Metals, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, 1988)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    ISO 8407, ‘Corrosion of Metal and Alloys – Removal of Corrosion Products from Corrosion Test Specimens’Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    ISO 9225, ‘Corrosion of Metal and Alloys – Corrosivity of Atmospheres – Methods of Measurement of Pollution’Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Corvo, F., Haces, C., Betancourt, N., Maldonado, L., Veleva, L., Echeverria, M., De Rincon, O.T., Rincon, A. 1997Corrosion Sci.39823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mendoza, A.R., Corvo, F. 1999Corrosion Sci.4175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Morcillo, M. 2000Corrosion Sci.4291CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Vera Cruz, R.P., Nishikata, A., Tsura, T. 1998Corrosion Sci.40125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ericsson, R. 1978Werkstoffe und Korrosion29400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Oesch, S. 1996Corrosion Sci.381357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sereda, P.J. 1974Corrosion in Natural EnvironmentsASTM Spec. Tech. Publ.Philadelphia558Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    S.W. Dean, in R. Baboian (ed.), ‘Electrochemical Technique for Corrosion Engineering’, (NACE, 1986)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical EngineeringNational Yunlin University of Science and TechnologyYunlinTaiwan, R.O.C.

Personalised recommendations