Advertisement

The role of interest-driven participatory game design: considering design literacy within a technology classroom

  • Farzan Baradaran Rahimi
  • Beaumie Kim
Article

Abstract

Adolescents develop skills and ideas from their interest-driven practices, which shape a type of literacy that may differ from the traditional ideas of literacy. This paper takes a qualitative approach to identify adolescents’ activities through interest-driven participatory design. We interacted with grade 9 students at a Western Canadian school who were designing games in a Career and Technology Studies classroom. We collected data through weekly observations, group presentations, written individual reflections on their own designs, oral and written group peer feedback, and final interviews with group members. Based on literature review and our observations, we drew on a framework focusing on adolescents’ participation in exploring, developing, and creating designs based on their own interest. We advocate for adopting interest-driven participatory game design in technology classroom, to engage learners more in learning and developing necessary skills to thrive in their lives.

Keywords

Interest-driven practices Participatory design Technology education Game design 

Notes

Funding

Funding was provided by Partner Research Schools Initiative of the Werklund School of Education at the University of Calgary.

References

  1. Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres and other late essays. (C. Emerson & M. Holquist, Eds., V. W. McGee, Trans.) (Second Printing edition). Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bertrand, J. T., Brown, J. E., & Ward, V. M. (1992). Techniques for analyzing focus group data. Evaluation Review, 16(2), 198–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boivin, N. (2008). Material cultures, material minds. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Clark, A. (1991). Microcognition: Philosophy, cognitive science, and parallel distributed processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  6. Clark, A. (1993). Associative engines: Connectionism, concepts, and representational change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  7. Clark, A. (1998). Being there: Putting brain, body, and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.Google Scholar
  8. Cortés, C. E. (1991). Pluribus & unum: The quest for community amid diversity. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning, 23(5), 8–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  10. Eisenkraft, A. (2010). Retrospective analysis of technological literacy of K-12 students in the USA. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 20(3), 277–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Felicia, P., & Pitt, I. (2007). Evaluating the effect of personality on the design of educational games. In Proceedings of the 1st European conference on games-based learning (ECGBL).Google Scholar
  12. Fields, D., Vasudevan, V., & Kafai, Y. B. (2015). The programmers’ collective: fostering participatory culture by making music videos in a high school Scratch coding workshop. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 613–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fu, F. L., Su, R. C., & Yu, S. C. (2009). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education, 52(1), 101–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Galloway, A. R. (2006). Gaming: Essays on algorithmic culture (Vol. 18). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  15. Gee, J. P. (2005). Semiotic social spaces and affinity spaces: From the age of mythology to today’s schools. In D. Barton & K. Tusting (Eds.), Beyond communities of practice: Language, power and social context (pp. 214–232). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gee, J. P. (2008). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (3rd ed.). Oxon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Greenhow, C., & Robelia, B. (2009). Old communication, new literacies: Social network sites as social learning resources. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 14(4), 1130–1161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  19. Ito, M., Horst, H., Bittanti, M., Boyd, D., Herr-Stephenson, B., Lange, P. G., et al. (2008). Living and learning with new media: Summary of findings from the Digital Youth Project. Chicago: The John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation.Google Scholar
  20. Jenkins, H., Purushotma, R., Weigel, M., Clinton, K., & Robison, A. J. (2009). Confronting the challenges of participatory culture: Media education for the 21st century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  21. Kafai, Y. B. (2006). Playing and making games for learning: Instructionist and constructionist perspectives for game studies. Games and Culture, 1(1), 36–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kafai, Y. B., Burke, Q., & Mote, C. (2012). What makes competitions fun to participate?: the role of audience for middle school game designers. In Proceedings of the 11th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 284–287). ACM.Google Scholar
  23. Kafai, Y. B., & Vasudevan, V. (2015). Constructionist gaming beyond the screen: Middle school students’ crafting and computing of touchpads, board games, and controllers. In Proceedings of the workshop in primary and secondary computing education (pp. 49–54). ACM.Google Scholar
  24. Kiili, K. (2005). Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(1), 13–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kim, B., Bastani, R., & Baradaran, F. (2017). Affordances of learner’s game design practices. In Selected proceedings of the IDEAS Conference 2017 Leading Educational Change (pp. 7–16). Calgary, Canada: University of Calgary.Google Scholar
  26. Kim, B., Tan, L., & Bielaczyc, K. (2015). Learner-generated designs in participatory culture: What they are and how they are shaping learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(5), 545–555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Maguire, M. (2001). Methods to support human-centred design. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 55(4), 587–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mawson, W. B. (2013). Emergent technological literacy: what do children bring to school? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 443–453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Merchant, G., & Carrington, V. (2009). Literacy and identity. Literacy, 43(2), 63–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Peppler, K., Warschauer, M., & Diazgranados, A. (2010). Game critics: Exploring the role of critique in game-design literacies. E-learning and Digital Media, 7(1), 35–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Resnick, M. (2007). All I really need to know (about creative thinking) I learned (by studying how children learn) in kindergarten. In Proceedings of the 6th ACM SIGCHI conference on creativity & cognition (pp. 1–6). New York, NY: ACM.Google Scholar
  32. Ricci, K. E. (1994). The use of computer-based videogames in knowledge acquisition and retention. Journal of Interactive Instruction Development, 7(1), 17–22.Google Scholar
  33. Richard, G. T., & Kafai, Y. B. (2015). Making physical and digital games with e-textiles: a workshop for youth making responsive wearable games and controllers. In Proceedings of the 14th international conference on interaction design and children (pp. 399–402). ACM.Google Scholar
  34. Tan, L., & Kim, B. (2015). Learning by doing in the digital media age. In T. Lin, V. Chen & C. S. Chai (Eds.), New media and learning in the 21st century (pp. 181–197). Singapore: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Virvou, M., Katsionis, G., & Manos, K. (2005). Combining software games with education: Evaluation of its educational effectiveness. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 54–65.Google Scholar
  36. Walsh, C. (2010). Systems-based literacy practices: Digital games research, gameplay and design. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 33(1), 24.Google Scholar
  37. Wenger, E. (2008). Identity in practice. In K. Hall, P. Murphy, & J. Soler (Eds.), Pedagogy and practice: Culture and identities (pp. 105–114). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Wijers, M., Jonker, V., & Kerstens, K. (2008). MobileMath: The phone, the game and the math. In Proceedings of the European conference on game based learning, Barcelona (pp. 507–516).Google Scholar
  39. Zimmerman, E. (2009). Gaming literacy: Game design as a model for literacy in the twenty-first century. The Video Game Theory Reader, 2, 23–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computational Media Design ProgramUniversity of CalgaryCalgaryCanada
  2. 2.Werklund School of Education, University of CalgaryCalgaryCanada

Personalised recommendations