Identifying design process patterns: a sequential analysis study of design thinking
- 35 Downloads
Design is a key element of both the teaching and learning of engineering and technology. However, the process of engineering design has yielded limited research results. This study explored the iterative design process by searching for sequential design thinking patterns. The researchers collected nine concurrent think-aloud protocols from fourth-grade elementary students. The study identified that idea generation plays a central role in design that features the dominant use of time. In addition, the researchers revealed significant pathways in design thinking and built a design pattern model. The results will not only help engineering and technology educators the understanding of design behavior, but also support the harmonious matching of learning and teaching styles in engineering and technology education.
KeywordsDesign process Design iteration Design pattern Protocol analysis Design cognition
This work was made possible by National Science Foundation Grant (DUE 0962840). Any opinions, and findings expressed in this material are the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of NSF.
- Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., Sorensen, C. K., & Walker, D. (2014). Introduction to research in education. Belmont, CA: Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
- Atman, C. J., Adams, R. S., Cardella, M. E., Turns, J., Mosborg, S., & Saleem, J. (2007). Engineering design process: A comparison of students and expert practitioners. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(4), 359–379. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2007.tb00945.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Atman, C. J., & Bursic, K. M. (1998). Verbal protocol analysis as a method to document engineering student design processes. Journal of Engineering Education, 87(2), 121–132. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.1998.tb00332.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bakeman, R., & Gottman, J. M. (1986). Observing interaction: An introduction to sequential analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
- Bakeman, R., & Quera, V. (2015). Generalized sequential [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.gsu.edu/~psyrab/gseq/. Accessed May 2017.
- Blount, R. L., Corbin, S. M., Sturges, J. W., Wolfe, V. V., Prater, J. M., & James, L. D. (1989). The relationship between adults’ behavior and child coping and distress during BMA/LP procedures: A sequential analysis. Behavior Therapy, 20(4), 585–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-7894(89)80136-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Bucciarelli, L. L. (2003). Engineering philosophy. Delft: Delft University Press.Google Scholar
- Clarkson, J., & Eckert, C. (2004). Design process improvement: A review of current practice. London: Springer.Google Scholar
- Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Crismond, D. P., & Adams, R. S. (2012). The informed design teaching and learning matrix. Journal of Engineering Education, 101(4), 738–797. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2012.tb01127.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cross, N. (2000). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design. New York, NY: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Cross, N. (2008). Engineering design methods: Strategies for product design (4th ed.). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Dym, C. L., Agogino, A. M., Eris, O., Frey, D. D., & Leifer, L. J. (2005). Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2168-9830.2005.tb00832.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1998). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineering Education, 78(7), 674–681.Google Scholar
- Halfin, H. H. (1973). Technology: A process approach. (Doctoral dissertation, West Virginia University) Dissertation Abstracts International, (1) 1111A.Google Scholar
- Hubka, V. (1982). Principles of engineering design. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
- Indiana Department of Education. (2010). Indiana Academic Standards for Science. Retrieved from http://www.doe.in.gov/standards/science-computer-science. Accessed May 2017.
- International Technology Education Association. (2000/2002/2007). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, VA: Author.Google Scholar
- Justice, L. M., Weber, S. E., Ezell, H. K., & Bakeman, R. (2002). A sequential analysis of children’s responsiveness to parental print references during shared book-reading interactions. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 11(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1044/1058-0360(2002/004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Katehi, L., Pearson, G., & Feder, M. (2009). Engineering in K-12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
- Kelley, T. R. (2010). Design assessment: Consumer reports style. The Technology Teacher, 69(8), 12–16.Google Scholar
- Koen, B. V. (2003). Discussion of the method: Conducting the engineer’s approach to problem solving. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Kolodner, J. L. (2002). Facilitating the learning of design practices: Lessons learned from an inquiry into science education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education, 39(3), 9–40.Google Scholar
- Lawson, B. R., & Dorst, K. (2009). Design expertise. Burlington, MA: Elsevier.Google Scholar
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Mosborg, S., & Adams, R., & Kim, R., & Cardella, M., & Atman, C., & Turns, J. (2005). Conceptions of the engineering design process: An expert study of advanced practicing professionals. Paper presented at 2005 Annual Conference, Portland, OR. Retrieved from https://peer.asee.org/14999. Accessed June 2005.
- National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar