Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Technology education in preschool: providing opportunities for children to use artifacts and to create

  • Published:
International Journal of Technology and Design Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In recent years, technology has been emphasized as an important area in early childhood curricula; however, in many countries preschool does not have the tradition of teaching specific subjects, and research shows that many preschool staff members are unsure about what teaching technology should include and how it should be taught. Therefore, with the ambition of outlining recommendations for both preschool practice and the preschool-teacher program, we investigated what elements staff members include in educating preschool children in technology. We investigated the research question What do preschool staff members include as elements of technology education in preschool? through open-ended items on a questionnaire completed by 102 preschool teachers and daycare attendants in Sweden. The answers were analyzed inductively, resulting in a set of seven categories: Artifacts and systems in children’s environments, Create, Problem solving, The concept of technology, Experiments, Techniques/Motor skills, and Natural science. Some key results emerged. First, artifacts have a central place in preschool technology education, and at least three verbs relate to how these artifacts are addressed: use, create, and understand. Second, the content of technology education in government regulatory documents is described to varying extents by the participants, and sometimes not at all. Third, expected elements like play and the important role of the staff are not expressed in the answers. Possible explanations and implications for the results are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anning, A. (1997). Drawing out ideas: Graphicacy and young children. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7(3), 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Brophy, S. (2011). Early engineering in young children’s exploratory play with tangible materials. Children Youth and Environments, 21(2), 212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bairaktarova, D., Evangelou, D., Bagiati, A., & Dobbs-Oates, J. (2012). The role of classroom artifacts in developmental engineering. Accessed December 18, 2013, from http://www.asee.org/search?search=the+role+of+classroom+artifacts+in+developmental+engineering.

  • Bennett, J. (2005). Curriculum issues in national policy-making. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 13(2), 5–23. doi:10.1080/13502930585209641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, C., & Treleven, T. (2011). Designerly thinking in the foundation stage. In C. Benson & J. Lunt (Eds.), International handbook of primary technology education: Reviewing the past twenty years (Vol. 7, pp. 137–150). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Broström, S., Sandberg, A., Johansson, I., Margetts, K., Nyland, B., Frøkjaer, T., et al. (2015). Preschool teachers’ views on children’s learning: An international perspective. Early Child Development and Care, 185(5), 824–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, C. (2010). The technological knowledge of early childhood pre-service educators. In TERC 2010: Proceedings of the 6th Biennal International Conference on Technology Education Research: Knowledge on Technology Education (pp. 83–91). Surfers Paradise, QLD: The International Technology Education Association.

  • Campbell, C., & Jobling, W. (2008). Technology education in early childhood settings. In H. E. Middleton & M. B. Pavlova (Eds.), Exploring technology education: Solutions to issues in a globalised world (Vol. 1). Nathan: Griffith University, Centre for Learning Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier-Reed, B. I. (2006). Pupils’ experiences of technology—Exploring dimensions of technological literacy. Cape Town: University of Cape Town.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cutter-Mackenzie, A., & Edwards, S. (2013). Toward a model for early childhood environmental education: Foregrounding, developing, and connecting knowledge through play-based learning. The Journal of Environmental Education, 44(3), 195–213. doi:10.1080/00958964.2012.751892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engdahl, I., & Ärlemalm-Hagsér, E. (Eds.). (2015). Att bli förskollärare: Mångfacetterad komplexitet. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evangelou, D., Dobbs-Oates, J., Bagiati, A., Liang, S., & Choi, J. Y. (2010). Talking about artifacts: Preschool children’s explorations with sketches, stories, and tangible objects. Early Childhood Research and Practice, 12(2). http://ecrp.illinois.edu/v12n2/evangelou.html. Accessed 13 July 2016.

  • Fleer, M. (2000). Working technologically: Investigations into how young children design and make during technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10(1), 43–59. doi:10.1023/a:1008923410441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graneheim, U. H., & Lundman, B. (2004). Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: Concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today, 24(2), 105–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagberg, J.-E., & Hultén, M. (2005). Skolans unervisning och elevers lärande i teknik—Svensk forskning i internationell kontext. Stockholm: Vetenskapsrådet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartas, D. (2010). Quantitative research as a method of inquiry in education. In D. Hartas (Ed.), Educational research and inquiry—Qualitative and quantitative approaches (pp. 65–81). London: Contimuun International Publishing Group Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellberg, K., & Elvstrand, H. (2013). Pedagogers tankar om teknik i förskolan. Accessed April 02, 2014, from http://www.liu.se/uv/lararrummet/venue/pedagogers-tankar-om-teknik-i-forskolan?l=sv.

  • Hsieh, H., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • International Technology Education Association. (2007). Standards for technological literacy. Content for the study of technology (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansson, E., & Samuelsson, I. P. (2006). Lek och läroplan: Möten mellan barn och lärare i förskola och skola (Göteborg studies in educational sciences: 249). Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A., Buntting, C., & de Vries, M. J. (2013). The developing field of technology education: A review to look forward. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 191–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell, R. (1996). Understanding practice in design and technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knutsdotter Olofsson, B. (2015). Lek för livet. In I. Engdahl & E. Ärlemalm-Hagsér (Eds.), Att bli förskollärare. Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsson, S. (2011). Kvalitativ analys—Exemplet fenomenografi. Accessed January 07, 2014, from http://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:253401/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

  • Lillvist, A., & Sandberg, A. (2015). Play in a Swedish preschool context. In J. L. Roopnarine, M. M. Patte, J. E. Johnson, & D. Kushner (Eds.), International perspectives on children’s play (pp. 175–186). Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lillvist, A., Sandberg, A., Sheridan, S., & Williams, P. (2014). Preschool teacher competence viewed from the perspective of students in early childhood teacher education. Journal of Education for Teaching, 40(1), 3–19. doi:10.1080/02607476.2013.864014.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mawson, W. B. (2011). Emergent technological literacy: What do children bring to school? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(2), 443–453. doi:10.1007/s10798-011-9188-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noffke, S., & Somekh, B. (2009). The SAGE handbook of educational action research. London: SAGE.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Starting strong III: A quality toolbox for early childhood education and care. Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., & Russo, S. (2003). Blocks: A commonly encountered play activity in the early years, or a key to facilitating skills in science, maths and technology? Investigating: Australian Primary & Junior Science Journal, 19(1), 17–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rönnerman, K. (2011). Aktionsforskning i praktiken—Kunskapsproduktion i praktiken. In S. Eklund (Ed.), Forskning om undervisning och lärande, 5. Lärare som praktiker och forskare. Om praxisnära forskningsmodeller (pp. 50–63). Stockholm: Stiftelsen SAF och Lärarförbundet.

  • Säljö, R. (2005). Vygotskij—Forskare, pedagog och visionär. In A. Forsell (Ed.), Boken om pedagogerna (pp. 108–132). Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelsson, I. P., & Pramling, N. (2013). Orchestrating and studying children’s and teachers’ learning: Reflections on developmental research approaches. Education Inquiry, 4(3), 519–536.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sénési, P. H. (1998). Technological knowledge, concepts and attitudes in nursery school. In Paper presented at the IDATER 1998 Conference, Loughborough.

  • Sheridan, S., Samuelsson, I. P., & Johansson, E. (Eds.). (2009). Barns tidiga lärande: En tvärsnittsstudie om förskolan som miljö för barns lärande. Göteborg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, S., Williams, P., Sandberg, A., & Vuorinen, T. (2011). Preschool teaching in Sweden—A Profession in change. Educational Research, 53(4), 415–437.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siraj-Blatchford, J., & Siraj-Blatchford, I. (1998). Learning through making in the early years. In J. S. Smith, & E. W. L. Norman (Eds.), International conference on design and technology educational research and curriculum development; IDATER 98 (pp. 32–36). Loughborough: Dept of Design and Technology Loughborough University.

  • Skolinspektionen. (2012). Förskola, före skola—Lärande och bärande. Kvalitetsgranskningsrapport om förskolans arbete med det förstärkta pedagogiska uppdraget. Accessed January 02, 2014, from http://www.skolinspektionen.se/Documents/Kvalitetsgranskning/forskola-2011/kvalgr-forskolan2-slutrapport.pdf.

  • Skolverket. (2004). Förskola i brytningstid—Nationell utvärdering av förskolan. Stockholm: Skolverket, Fritzes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skolverket. (2010). Läroplan för förskolan—Lpfö98. Reviderad 2010. Stockholm: Fritzes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stables, K. (1997). Critical issues to consider when introducing technology education into the curriculum of young learners. Journal of Technology Education, 8(2), 50–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stemler, S. E. (2004). A comparison of consensus, consistency, and measurement approaches to estimating interrater reliability. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 9(4). http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=9&n=4. Accessed 13 July 2016.

  • Sundqvist, P., Nilsson, T., & Gustafsson, P. (2015). Svensk förskolepersonals beskrivningar av teknik. LUMAT, 3(2), 237–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, M. (2009). Från föremål till system—Mot en undervisningsstrategi i grundskolan. In Å. Ingerman, K. Wagner, & A.-S. Axelsson (Eds.), På spaning efter teknisk bildning (pp. 207–221). Stockholm: Liber.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svensson, M. (2011). Att urskilja tekniska system : didaktiska dimensioner i grundskolan. Theses, Institutionen för samhälls- och välfärdsstudier, Linköpings universitet, Norrköping.

  • Swedish National Agency for Education. (2015). Förskolor. Accessed May 06, 2015, from http://www.skolverket.se/skolutveckling/miljo-och-halsa/hallbar-utveckling/utmarkelsen/utmarkta-skolor/forskolor-1.98136.

  • Teknikdelegationen. (2009). Hur gör man i andra länder?—En internationell kartläggning av nationella satsningar för att öka intresset för naturvetenskap och teknik. Stockholm: Teknikdelegationen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turja, L., Endepohls-Ulpe, M., & Chatoney, M. (2009). A conceptual framework for developing the curriculum and delivery of technology education in early childhood. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(4), 353–365. doi:10.1007/s10798-009-9093-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utbildningsdepartementet. (2010). Förskola i utveckling—Bakgrund till ändringar i förskolans läroplan. Stockholm: Regeringskansliet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vallberg Roth, A.-C. (2011). De yngre barnens läroplanshistoria. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Poel, I. (2010). Philosophy and engineering: Setting the stage. In I. van de Poel, & D. E. Goldberg (Eds.), Philosophy and Engineering (pp. 1–11, Philosophy of engineering and technology 2). Springer.

  • van Meeteren, B., & Zan, B. (2010). Revealing the work of young engineers in early childhood education. In Paper presented at the SEED (STEM in Early Education and Development), Iowa, USA.

  • Vetenskapsrådet. (2011). God forskningssed. Vetenskapsrådets rapportserie 1:2011. Stockholm.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Peter Gustafsson at Mälardalen University for stimulating discussions and for comments that greatly improved the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Education, Culture, and Communication, Mälardalen University, Gurksaltargatan 9, 722 18, Västerås, Sweden

    Pernilla Sundqvist

  2. School of Education, Culture, and Communication, Mälardalen University, Drottninggatan 12, 632 20, Eskilstuna, Sweden

    Tor Nilsson

Authors
  1. Pernilla Sundqvist
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tor Nilsson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pernilla Sundqvist.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sundqvist, P., Nilsson, T. Technology education in preschool: providing opportunities for children to use artifacts and to create. Int J Technol Des Educ 28, 29–51 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9375-y

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-016-9375-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation