Advertisement

Teaching and learning for sustainable development: ESD research in technology education

  • Margarita Pavlova
Article

Abstract

When education for sustainable development (ESD) emerged as part of the educational agenda in the international arena, it was associated with significant shifts in the educational debate about the purpose and nature of education and with the need to respond to crises caused by the modern idea of progress. Scientists from different fields warn humanity that the current trajectory of capitalism is leading towards environmental and cultural decline and that urgent measures are required to deal with the current and emerging issues. Global financial and economic crises, poverty and inequality, climate change and environmental degradation reinforce our understanding that a collaborative effort is required in addressing the existing status quo through education. These changing contexts require transformative education that must play a key role in developing a planetary vision, in “securing sustainable life chances, aspirations and futures for young people”. This paper refers to the essence of SD and the ethics behind it, explores current research on ESD in technology education (TE) and suggests a number of challenges that emerged for technology education as a result of the global SD agenda. They are related to policy and curriculum development, teaching and learning, and teacher training. This paper argues that current and future research on ESD in technology education must be framed by a shared vision about quality education and a society that lives in balance with Earth’s carrying capacity. The paper concludes with suggestions for further directions for research associated with the areas of challenge.

Keywords

Education for sustainable development Research in technology education Transformative education Policy and curriculum development Teaching and learning Teacher training 

References

  1. Argyris, C., & Schön, D. A. (2004). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. In W. Scott & S. Gough (Eds.), Key issues in sustainable development and learning: A critical review (pp. 63–68). London: Routledge Falmer.Google Scholar
  2. Ball, S. J. (1994). Educational reform: A critical and post structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ball, S. J. (1997). Policy sociology and critical social research: A personal review of recent education policy and policy research. British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 257–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bonnett, M. (2002). Education for sustainability as a frame of mind. Environmental Education Research, 8(1), 9–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Campbell, W. J., McMeniman, M. M., & Baikaloff, N. (1992). Visions of a desirable future for Australian society. New Horizons in Education, 87, 17–39.Google Scholar
  6. Cartea, P. Á. M. (2005). In praise of environmental education. Policy Futures in Education, 3(3), 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. De Vries, M., & Dakers, J. R. (2005). Editorial. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 95–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Elshof, L. (2003). Teacher’s interpretation of sustainable development. In J. Dakers & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), PATT-13 international conference on design and technology educational research (pp. 45–51). Glasgow, UK: Faculty of Education University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  9. Elshof, L. (2005). Teacher’s interpretation of sustainable development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 173–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Elshof, L. (2009). Towards sustainable practices in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(2), 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  12. Engeström, Y. (1993). Developmental studies on work as a testbench of activity theory. In S. Chaiklin & J. Lave (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Engeström, Y. (1995). Objects, contradictions and collaboration in medical cognition: An activity-theoretical perspective. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, 7, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Engeström, Y. (1999). Activity theory and individual and social transformation. In Y. Engeström, R. Miettinen, & R.-L. Punamäki (Eds.), Perspectives on activity theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Freire, P., & Macedo, D. P. (1995). A dialogue: Culture, language, race. Harvard Educational Review, 65, 377–402.Google Scholar
  16. Hill, A. M., & Elshof, L. (2007). Sustainable practices as an aspect of technological literacy: Research findings from secondary school teachers’ and their classrooms. In J. Dakers, W. Dow, & M. de Vries (Eds.), Teaching and learning technological literacy in the classroom: The PATT-18 international conference on design and technology educational research (pp. 241–250). Glasgow: University of Glasgow Print Unit.Google Scholar
  17. Holdsworth, I., & Conway, B. (1999). Investigating values in secondary design and technology education. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 4(3), 205–214.Google Scholar
  18. Huckle, J. (2006). Education for sustainable development: A briefing paper for the training and development agency for schools. http://john.huckle.org.uk/download/2708/Education%20for%20Sustainable%20Development,%20a%20briefing%20paper%20for%20the%20Teacher%20Training%20Agency.doc.
  19. Huckle, J., & Sterling, S. (2005). Education for sustainability: An invitation to join a debate. http://john.huckle.org.uk/publications_downloads.jsp.
  20. International Technology Education Association. (2000). Standards for technological literacy: Content for the study of technology. Reston, Virginia: The author.Google Scholar
  21. IUCN, Unep, & WWF. (1991). Caring for the earth: A strategy for sustainable living. Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
  22. Leont’ev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress.Google Scholar
  23. Lundegård, I., & Wickman, P.-O. (2007). Conflicts of interest: An indispensable element of education for sustainable development. Environmental Education Research, 13(1), 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Marginson, S. (1993). Education and public policy in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, M. (2003). Significance of sustainability issues for design and technology education: Rhetoric, reality and resources. In J. Dakers & M. J. de Vries (Eds.), PATT-13 International conference on design and technology educational research (pp. 165–169). Glasgow, UK: Faculty of Education University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
  26. Mezirow, J. (2000). Learning to think like an adult: Core concepts of transformative theory. In J. Mezirow (Ed.), Learning as transformation: Critical perspectives on a theory in progress. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  27. Miller, C., & Pitt, J. (2000). Live Well! Live wisely! Technology for sustainable development. London: Intermediate Technology.Google Scholar
  28. Mooney, B. (2006). Facilitating Socio-cultural learning within technology education. Unpublished Honours dissertation supervised by M. Pavlova. Griffith University: Brisbane.Google Scholar
  29. O’Neill, M. H. (1995). Introduction. In D. S. G. Carter & M. H. O’Neill (Eds.), International perspectives on educational reform and policy implementation (pp. 1–11). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar
  30. Parker, W. C., Ninomiya, A., & Cogan, J. (1999). Educating world citizens: Toward multinational curriculum development. American Educational Research Journal, 36(2), 117–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pavlova, M. (2001). Theorising knowledge in technology education: Policy analysis of four countries. Unpublished PhD Thesis. La Trobe University: Melbourne.Google Scholar
  32. Pavlova, M. (2002). “Teaching” values in technology education: a critical approach for the theoretical framework. In H Middleton, M. Pavlova and D. Roebuck (Ed), Learning in Technology Education: Challenges for the 21st Century, Proceedings of the 2nd Biennial International Conference on Technology Education Research (pp.96 –102).Brisbane: Griffith University.Google Scholar
  33. Pavlova, M. (2005). Knowledge and values in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15(2), 127–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pavlova, M. (2006). Technology education for sustainable futures. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 11(2), 41–53.Google Scholar
  35. Pavlova, M. (2009a). Conceptualisation of technology education within the paradigm of sustainable development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19, 109–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pavlova, M. (2009b). Technology and vocational education for sustainable development: Empowering individuals for the future. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Pavlova, M. (2011). ESD through technology education: contextualisation of approaches. African Journal of Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 15(3), 41–55.Google Scholar
  38. Pavlova, M., & Turner, S. (2007). It’s never too early: education for sustainable development. The International Journal of Environmental, Cultural, Economic and Social Sustainability, 2(7), 69–76.Google Scholar
  39. Pearson, G., & Young, A. T. (Eds.). (2002). Technically speaking: Why all Americans need to know more about technology. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
  40. Peters, M. A., & Gonzalez-Gaudiano, E. (2008). Introduction. In E. González-Gaudiano & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Environmental education: Identity, politics and citizenship (pp. 1–11). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  41. Pitt, J., & Lubben, F. (2009). The social agenda of education for sustainable development within Design & Technology: The case of the sustainable design award. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(2), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. QCA. (2007a). New secondary national curriculum. Retrieved October 21, 2007, from http://www.qca.org.uk/libraryAssets/media/D-and-T_KS3_PoS.pdf.
  43. QCA. (2007b). GCE AS and A level subject criteria for design and technology (September 2006).Retrieved October 21, 2007, from http://www.qca.org.uk/libraryAssets/media/qca-06–2845_design_technology.pdf.
  44. QSA. (2007). Technology studies syllabus. Brisbane: The State of Queensland.Google Scholar
  45. Ritz, J. M. (2009). A new generation of goals for technology education. Journal of Technology Education, 20(2), 50–64.Google Scholar
  46. Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Shamaeva, M. I., Semenova, V. D., & Sitnikova, N. V. (1995). Didakticheskii material ‘Natsional’no –regionalnuj component na urokah anglijskogo jazuka” [Teaching materials “National – regional component for English lessons’]. Yakutsk: Bitchik.Google Scholar
  48. Stables, K. (2009). Educating for environmental sustainability and educating for creativity: Actively compatible or missed opportunities? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 19(2), 199–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education, re-visioning learning and change. Dartington: Green Books.Google Scholar
  50. Sterling, S. (2004). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Schumacher Briefings no. 6. Devon: Green Books, Ltd.Google Scholar
  51. Sterling, S. (2007) From the push of fear, to the pull of hope: Learning by design. Southern African Journal of Environmental Education, 24, 30-34. Retrieved 12 March 2010, from http://www.eeasa.org.za/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64:southern-african-journal-of-environmental-education-volume-24-2007&catid=45:journals&Itemid=72.Google Scholar
  52. Stevenson, R. B. (2006). Tensions and transitions in policy discourse: Recontextualizing a decontextualized EE/ESD debate. Environmental Education Research, 12(3–4), 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor, E. W. (2008). Transformative learning theory. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 119, 5–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. UN. (1992, June). Rio declaration on environment and development. Presented at the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. http://www.un.org/documents/ga/conf151/aconf15126-1annex1.htm.
  55. UNEP (2011). Towards a Green Economy: Pathways to Sustainable Development and Poverty Eradication. Access from www.unep.org/greeneconomy on June 2011.
  56. UNESCO. (1969). Final report.I Intergovernmental conference of experts on the scientific basis for rational use and conservation of the resources of the biosphere, Paris, 4-13 September 1968. Document SC/MD/9. Paris: UNESCO. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0001/000172/017269eb.pdf.
  57. UNESCO. (1997) Educating for a Sustainable Future: A Transdisciplinary Vision for Concerted Action. Prepared for International Conference on Environment and Society: Education and Public Awareness for Sustainablity. Thessalonika (Greece), 8-12 December 1997. Document EPD-97/CONF.401/CLD.1. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  58. UNESCO. (2005). United Nations decade of education for sustainable development 2005–2014. UNESCO Education Sector: International implementation scheme. Paris.Google Scholar
  59. UNESCO. (2006). Framework for the DESD international implementation scheme. Paris: UNESCO Education Sector. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0014/001486/148650E.pdf.
  60. UNESCO. (2009, March-April). Bonn Declaration on Education for Sustainable Development. UNESCO World Conference on Education for Sustainable Development, Bonn, Germany. Bonn: German Commission for UNESCO.Google Scholar
  61. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
  63. Wicklein, R. (Ed.). (2001). Appropriate technology for sustainable living. 50th yearbook of the Council on Technology Teacher Education. VA: ITEA.Google Scholar
  64. Williams, S. H. (2003). Black mama sauce: Integrating the theatre of the oppressed and afrocentricity in transformative learning. In C. A. Wiessner, S. R. Meyer, N. L. Pfhal, and P. G. Neaman (Eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Transformative Learning, (cited in Taylor, 2008).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Griffith Institute for Educational Research, School of Education and Professional StudiesGriffith UniversityMt GravattAustralia

Personalised recommendations