Advertisement

A model of creative design process for fostering creativity of students in design education

  • Yi Lin Wong
  • Kin Wai Michael Siu
Article

Abstract

Creativity, which is concerned with problem solving, is essential if we are to generate new solutions to the massive and complex problems in the unknown future. Our next generation needs an educational platform where they can be taught to possess creativity. Design education is such a way to foster students’ creativity. Therefore, it is essential to understand the creative design process and its routine in order to show how students can generate creative output and how teachers can guide students in the design process. Consequently, the aim of this paper is to investigate the creative design process as it is employed in producing creative designs, and further recommend how students can practise and learn to be creative based on the model process developed in this paper. The model is expected to provide a guideline for teachers to facilitate students along the creative thinking process.

Keywords

Creativity Creative thinking process Design process Creative design process Design education Design and technology education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank The Hong Kong Polytechnic University and the K. C. Wong Education Foundation for the support of this study. The authors would also like to thank the anonymous reviewers’ and the editors’ constructive and insightful comments.

References

  1. Adair, J. (1990). The art of creative thinking. Surrey: Talbot Adair Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amabile, T. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amabile, T. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to the social psychology of creativity. Boulder, CO: West View Press.Google Scholar
  4. Archer, L. B. (1984). Systematic method for designers. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  5. Aspelund, K. (2006). The design process. New York, NY: Fairchild.Google Scholar
  6. Atkinson, S. (2000). Does the need for high levels of performance curtail the development of creativity in design and technology project work? International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 10, 255–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baer, J. (2003). Evaluative thinking, creativity, and task specificity: Separating wheat from chaff is not the same as finding needles in haystacks. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  8. Barlex, D. (2007). Creativity in school design and technology in England: A discussion of influences. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 17(2), 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Chand, I., & Runco, M. (1992). Problem finding skills as components in the creative process. Personality and Individual Differences, 14, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Diakidoy, I.-A. N., & Kanari, E. (1999). Student teachers’ beliefs about creativity. British Educational Research Journal, 25(2), 225–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dorst, K. (2003). Understanding design: 150 reflections on being a designer. Amsterdam: BIS Publishers.Google Scholar
  13. Dudek, S. Z., & Côté, R. (1994). Problem finding revisited. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Problem finding, problem solving and creativity. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
  14. Eggleston, J. (2001). Teaching design and technology (3rd ed.). Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Eris, O. (2003). Manifestation of divergent-convergent thinking in question asking and decision making processes of design teams: A performance dimension. In U. Lindemann (Ed.), Human behaviour in design: Individuals, teams, tools. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  16. Gero, J. S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004). The situated function-behaviour-structure-framework. Design Studies, 25(4), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Getzels, J. W. (1987). Problem finding and creative achievement. Gifted Students Institute Quarterly, 12(4), B1–B4.Google Scholar
  18. Guildford, J. P. (1987). Creativity research: Past, present and future. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basic. Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar
  19. Hausman, C. R. (2009). Criteria of creativity. In M. Krausz, D. Dutton, & K. Bardsley (Eds.), The idea of creativity. Boston, MA: Brill.Google Scholar
  20. Hicks, M. J. (2004). Problem solving and decision making: Hard, soft and creative approaches (2nd ed.). London: Thomson.Google Scholar
  21. Howard, T. J., Culley, S. J., & Dekoninck, E. (2008). Describing the creative design process by the integration of engineering design and cognitive psychology literature. Design Studies, 29(2), 160–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Howard-Jones, P. A. (2002). A dual-state model of creative cognition for supporting strategies that foster creativity in the classroom. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12(3), 215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Isaksen, S. G., & Murkock, M. C. (1993). The emergence of a discipline: Issues and approaches to the study of creativity. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), The emergence of a discipline. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publication Corporation.Google Scholar
  24. Jones, J. C. (1984). A method of systematic design. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  25. Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Oxford: Elsevier/Architectural.Google Scholar
  26. Leung, T. P. (2004). Design education. In T. P. Leung (Ed.), Hong Kong: Better by design. Hong Kong: School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University.Google Scholar
  27. Luckman, J. (1984). An approach to the management of design. In N. Cross (Ed.), Developments in design methodology. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  28. Martin, D. J., Dakers, J., Duvernet, L., Kipperman, D., Kumar, K., Siu, K. W. M., et al. (2003). In search of a sustainable future: An international overview of the contribution from design and technology education. The Journal of Design and Technology Education, 8(3), 137–149.Google Scholar
  29. Mayer, R. E. (1999). Fifty years of creativity research. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Meador, K. S. (1997). Creative thinking and problem solving for young learners. Englewood, CO: Teacher Ideas Press.Google Scholar
  31. Ministry of Education. (2006). Design and technology syllabus: Lower secondary–special/express/normal (academic). Singapore: Curriculum Planning & Development Division, Ministry of Education.Google Scholar
  32. Moore, D. J. (2007). Design and the creative process. Clifton Park, NY: Thomson/Delmar Learning.Google Scholar
  33. Necka, E. (2003). Creative interaction: A conceptual schema for the process of producing ideas and judging the outcomes. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  34. Nicholl, B., & McLellan, R. (2008). We’re all in this game whether we like it or not to get a number of As to Cs: Design and technology teachers’ struggles to implement creativity and performativity policies. British Educational Research Journal, 34(5), 585–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Osborn, A. F. (1979). Applied imagination: Principles and procedures of creative problem-solving (3rd ed.). New York: Scribner.Google Scholar
  36. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1996). Engineering design: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). London: Springer.Google Scholar
  37. Peto, J. (1999). Design process, progress, practice. London: Design Museum.Google Scholar
  38. Pigrum, D. (2009). Teaching creativity: multi-mode transitional practices. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  39. Rhodes, M. (1961). An analysis of creativity. Phi Delta Kappan, 42(7), 305–310.Google Scholar
  40. Rhodes, M. (1987). An analysis of creativity. In S. G. Isaksen (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research: Beyond the basics. Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar
  41. Roberto, M. A. (2000). Strategic decision-making processes: Achieving efficiency and consensus simultaneously (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Boston, M.A., USA: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  42. Runco, M. A. (2003). Idea evaluation, divergent thinking, and creativity. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  43. Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rutland, M. (2009). Art and design and design and technology: Is there creativity in the designing? Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 14(1), 56–67.Google Scholar
  45. Rutland, M., & Barlex, D. (2008). Perspectives on pupil creativity in design and technology in the lower secondary curriculum in England. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(2), 139–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Saaty, T. L. (2006). Creative thinking, problem solving and decision making. Pittsburgh, PA: RWS Publications.Google Scholar
  47. Sawyer, R. K. (2006). Explaining creativity: The science of human innovation. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  48. Siu, K. W. M. (1998). Relay thinking in action: A Hong Kong case study. The Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 8(2), 29–46.Google Scholar
  49. Siu, K. W. M. (2000). A comparative study of relay thinking activities in degree and secondary level students. Educational Research Journal, 15(1), 45–68.Google Scholar
  50. Siu, K. W. M. (2002). Meeting the new needs: Curriculum development and assessment of technology subjects. In 25th anniversary commemorative album of the Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Examinations and Assessment Authority.Google Scholar
  51. Siu, K. W. M. (2009). Review on the development of design education in Hong Kong: The need to nurture the problem finding capability of design students. Educational Research Journal, 23(2), 179–202.Google Scholar
  52. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  53. Tunstall, G. (2006). Managing the building design process. Oxford: Elsevier Butterworkth-Heinemann.Google Scholar
  54. Wallas, G. (1926). The art of thought. London: J. Cape.Google Scholar
  55. Warr, A. M. (2007). Understanding and supporting creativity in design (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Bath, U.K.: University of Bath.Google Scholar
  56. Webster, A., Campbell, C., & Jane, B. (2006). Enhancing the creative process for learning in primary technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 16(3), 221–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wise, D. (1990). The design process. East Sussex: Wayland.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of DesignThe Hong Kong Polytechnic UniversityHung Hom, KowloonHong Kong

Personalised recommendations