The teacher–community of practice–student interaction in the New Zealand technology classroom

  • Wendy Slatter
  • Bev France


In New Zealand in order to provide authentic learning experiences teachers are counselled to access Communities of Practice (CoP) (Ministry of Education 2007). This research provides information about teachers’ interactions with CoPs and the implication of this access on their pedagogy. A range of interactions occurred which was influenced by how teachers perceived this use of a CoP representative in their classrooms. These styles of interactions were used by the teachers to create a ‘deep, broad learning experience’ for their students as they developed their technological practice. Two interaction strategies occurred that placed either the CoP in control or the teacher in control. When the teacher was in control four interaction styles occurred with the teacher managing the interaction of the CoP representative. This management allowed the teacher to filter the degree of direct interaction. This research shows that technology teachers’ belief systems affected the pedagogy of the CoP-student interaction.


Community of practice Situated learning Locus of control Authentic learning 


  1. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 32–42.Google Scholar
  2. Compton, V., & Harwood, C. (2003). Enhancing technological practice: An assessment framework for technology education in New Zealand. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 1–26.Google Scholar
  3. Compton, V., & Harwood, C. (2006). Discussion document: Design ideas for future technology programmes. Retrieved December 28, 2006 from
  4. Head, G., & Dakers, J. (2005). Vérillon’s trio and Wenger’s community: learning in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Hill, A. M., & Smith, H. A. (2005). Research in purpose and value for the study of technology education in secondary schools: a theory of authentic learning. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 15, 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hirsch, D. (1992). School and business: A new partnership. France: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Google Scholar
  7. Jones, A., & Compton, V. (1998). Towards a model for teacher development in technology education: From research to practice. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 13, 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Jones, A., & Moreland, J. (2004). Enhancing practicing primary school teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge in technology. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 121–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lave, J. (1988). Cognition in practice: Mind, mathematics, and culture in everyday life. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning, Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  11. McCormick, R. (2004). Issues of learning and knowledge in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 14, 21–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ministry of Education. (1995). Technology in the New Zealand curriculum. Wellington: Learning Media.Google Scholar
  13. Ministry of Education (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Retrieved November 29, 2007 from
  14. New Zealand Qualifications Authority (2007). NCEA. Retrieved July 23, 2009 from
  15. Slatter, N. W. (2007). Making technology education real: Accessing a community of practice. Unpublished masters thesis. University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  16. Slatter, W., & France, B. (2008). Accessing the community of practice in technology education. In H. Middleton & M. Pavlova (Eds.), Exploring technology education: Solutions to issues in a globalised world (Vol. 2, pp. 137–146). Surfers Paradise, Queensland, Australia: Griffith Institute for Educational Research.Google Scholar
  17. Turnbull, W. (2002). The place of authenticity in technology in the New Zealand curriculum. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 12, 23–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. W. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L.S. Vygotsky, Vol 1, Problems of general psychology. (N. Minick, Trans.). New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  19. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Epsom Girls Grammar SchoolAucklandNew Zealand
  2. 2.University of AucklandAucklandNew Zealand

Personalised recommendations