Abstract
The present study focuses on the relationship between the acquisition of design knowledge by novice design students and the quality of their designs. Design learning is typically based on action and reflection. Knowledge of solution processes, being part of this reflection, is found to be crucial in monitoring and controlling the design process and in reaching an optimal, creative result. The studies described in this article suggest a close relationship between the amount of process knowledge – knowledge of managing and monitoring the solution finding process – reported by novice designers, and the creativity of the designed product.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ö. Akin (1986) Psychology of Architectural Design Pion Limited London
P. A. Alexander J. E. Judy (1988) ArticleTitle‘The Interaction of Domain-Specific and Strategic Knowledge in Academic Performance’ Review of Educational Research 58 375–404
P.A. Alexander D.L. Schallert V.C. Hare (1991) ArticleTitle‘Coming to Terms: How Researchers in Learning and Literacy Talk about Knowledge’ Review of Educational Research 61 315–343
P.A. Alexander T.L. Jetton J.M. Kulikowich (1996) ArticleTitle‘Interrelationship of Knowledge, Interest and Recall: Assessing a Model of Domain Learning’ Journal of Educational Psychology 87 559–575 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-0663.87.4.559
T. M. Amabile (1983) The Social Psychology of Creativity Springer-Verlag New York
T. A. Amabile (2001) ArticleTitle‘Beyond Talent: John Irving and the Passionate Craft of Creativity’ American Psychologist 56 IssueID4 333–336 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0003-066X.56.4.333 Occurrence Handle11330231
Archer B. (1963) ‘Systematic Method for Designers’, Design4
J.R. Anderson (1987) ArticleTitle‘Skill Acquisition: Compilation of Weak-method Problem Solutions’ Psychological Review 94 192–210 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0033-295X.94.2.192
J. R. Anderson (1996) ArticleTitle‘ACT: A Simple Theory of Complex Cognition’ American Psychologist 51 IssueID4 355–365 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0003-066X.51.4.355
Anzai Y. (1991) ‘Learning and Use of Representations for Physics Expertise’. In: Ericsson K.A., Smith J. (ed). Toward a General Theory of Expertise, Cambridge University Press, New York, pp. 64–92
J. Bransford R. Sherwood N. Vye J. Rieser (1986) ArticleTitle‘Teaching Thinking and Problem Solving’ American psychologist 41 1078–1089 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1078
M.T. Chi P.J Feltovitch R. Glaser (1981) ArticleTitle‘Categorization and Representation of Physics Problems by Experts and Novices’ Cognitive Science 5 121–152
Christiaans, H. H. C. M.: 1992, Creativity in Design. The Role of Domain Knowledge in Designing, Lemma B.V., Utrecht
H. H. C. M. Christiaans (2002b) ArticleTitle‘Creativity as a Design Criterion’ Creativity Research Journal 14 41–54 Occurrence Handle10.1207/S15326934CRJ1401_4
Christiaans H.H.C.M. (2002a), Book Review of C. Eastman, M. McCracken,, W. Newstetter (eds.), (2001). Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education. Elsevier, Oxford. Design Studies23(4) 2002, 433–434
J. Cohen (1960) ArticleTitle‘A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales’ Educational and Psychological Measurement 20 37–46
G. Cooper J. Sweller (1987) ArticleTitle‘The Effects of Schema Acquisition and Rule Automation on Mathematical Problem-solving Transfer’ Journal of Educational Psychology 79 347–362 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-0663.79.4.347
Eastman C. M. (1969) ‘On the Analysis of Intuitive Design Processes’. In: Moore G.T. (ed). Emerging Methods in Environmental Design and Planning. The MIT Press, Cambridge,Massachusetts
C. Eastman M. McCracken W. Newstetter (Eds) (2001) Design Knowing and Learning: Cognition in Design Education Elsevier Oxford
R. Elio P. B. Scharf (1990) ArticleTitle‘Modelling Novice-to-expert Shifts in Problem Solving Strategy and Knowledge Organization’ Cognitive Science 14 579–639 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0364-0213(90)90010-T
K.A. Ericsson J. Smith (1991) Toward a General Theory of Expertise Cambridge University Press New York
Eyk, G. H. A. van.: 1982, ‘The Writing of Learning Experiences as a Teaching Tool’, in R. Langdon, K. Baynes, P. Roberts (eds.), Design Education: Vol.5. Proceedings of the Design Policy Conference,London, 1982, Design Council, London
R.M. Gagné (1970) The Conditions of Learning Holt EditionNumber2 Rinehart Winston
J. G. Greeno (1980) ‘Trends in the Theory of Knowledge for Problem Solving’ D. T. Tuma F. Reif (Eds) Problem Solving and Education Erlbaum Illsdale, NJ 9–25
Groot, A. D. de: 1974, ‘To What Purpose, to What Effect? Some Problems of Method and Theory in the Evaluation of Higher Education’, in W. A. Verreck (ed.), Methodological Problems in Research and Development, Swets, Zeitlinger, Amsterdam
D.F. Halpern (1998) ArticleTitle‘Teaching Critical Thinking for Transfer Across Domains: Dispositions, Skills, Structure Training and Metacognitive Monitoring’ American Psychologist 53 IssueID4 449–455 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0003-066X.53.4.449 Occurrence Handle9572008
A. Hedge B.R. Lawson (1979) ‘Creative Thinking’ W.T. Singleton (Eds) Compliance and Excellence. The Study of Real Skills. MTP press ltd Lancaster 280–305
T.de Jong M. G. M. Ferguson-Hessler (1986) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Structures of Good and Poor Novice Problem Solvers in Physics’ Journal of Educational Psychology 78 279–288 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-0663.78.4.279
P. Kirschner P. Van Vilstercn H. Hummel M. Wigman (1997) ArticleTitle‘The Design of a Study Environment for Acquiring Academic and Professional Competence’ Studies in Higher Education 22 151–171 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075079712331381014
P. Langley H.A. Simon G.L. Bradshaw J.M. Zytkow (1987) Scientific Discovery Computational Explorations of the Creative Processes The MIT Press Cambridge, MA
J. Larkin J. McDermott D. Simon H. Simon (1980) ArticleTitle‘Models of Competence in Solving Physics Problems’ Cognitive Science 4 317–348 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0364-0213(80)80008-5
R.E. Mayer (1987) Educational Psychology: A Cognitive Approach Little Brown, Boston
Pietersen, C.: 2002, ‘Research as a Learning Experience: A Phenomenological Explication’, The Qualitative Report7(2). http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR7-2/pietersen.html
D. A. Schön (1983) The Reflective Practitioner Basic Books New York
H. A. Simon (1973) ArticleTitle‘Structure of Ill Structured Problems’ Artificial Intelligence 4 181–201 Occurrence Handle10.1016/0004-3702(73)90011-8
D. K. Simonton (2000) ArticleTitle‘Creativity: Cognitive, Personal, Developmental and Social Aspects’ American Psychologist 55 IssueID1 151–158 Occurrence Handle10.1037//0003-066X.55.1.151 Occurrence Handle11392859
Sternberg R. J., Lubart T. I. (1996) ‘Investing in Creativity’. American psychologist 677–688
J. Sweller (1989) ArticleTitle‘Cognitive Technology: Some Procedures for Facilitating Learning and Problem Solving in Mathematics and Science’ Journal of Educational Psychology 81 457–466 Occurrence Handle10.1037/0022-0663.81.4.457
P. Tynjala (1998) ArticleTitle‘Traditional Studying for Examination Versus Constructivist Learning Tasks: Do Learning Outcome Differ?’ Studies in Higher Education 23 173–189 Occurrence Handle10.1080/03075079812331380374
Venselaar K., Gerritsen van de Hoop W., Drunen P. van (1987) ‘The Knowledge Base of the Designer’, in P. R. J. Simons, G. Beukhof (eds.), Regulation of learning,pp. 121–135, SVO, The Hague.
R. W. Weisberg (1986) Creativity. Genius and Other Myths Freeman New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Christiaans, H., Venselaar, K. Creativity in Design Engineering and the Role of Knowledge: Modelling the Expert. Int J Technol Des Educ 15, 217–236 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-1904-4
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-004-1904-4