International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 22, Issue 5, pp 723–740 | Cite as

Optimal redistributive pensions and the cost of self-control

  • Pier-André Bouchard St-Amant
  • Jean-Denis Garon


We examine how the introduction of self-control preferences influences the tradeoff between two fundamental components of a public pension system: the contribution rate and its degree of redistribution. The pension regime affects individuals’ welfare by altering how yielding to temptation (i.e., not saving, or saving less) is attractive. We show that proportional taxation increases the cost of self-control, and that this adverse effect is more acute when public pensions become more redistributive.


Taxation Redistribution Pensions Self-control 

JEL Classification

H55 H21 D03 



We thank Charles Bellemarre, Robin Boadway, Helmuch Cremer, Sean Horan, Sumon Majumdar, Pierre-Carl Michaud, Marie-Louise Vierø, Tim Worall, Pierre-Yves Yanni, seminar participants at Université Laval and two anonymous referees for their suggestions and comments.


  1. Ameriks, J., Caplin, A., Leahy, J., & Tyler, T. (2007). Measuring self-control problems. American Economic Review, 97(3), 966–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Angeletos, G.-M., Laibson, D., Repetto, A., Tobacman, J., & Weinberg, S. (2001). The hyberbolic consumption model: Calibration, simulation, and empirical evaluation. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(3), 47–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ariely, D., & Wertenbroch, K. (2002). Procrastination, deadlines and performance. Psychological Bulletin, 82, 463–496.Google Scholar
  4. Ashraf, N., Karlan, D., & Yin, W. (2006). Tying odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment savings product in the philippines. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(2), 635–672.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumeister, R. F. (2002). Yielding to temptation: Self-control failure, impulsive purchasing, and consumer behavior. Journal of Consumer Research, 28, 670–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bernheim, B. D., Skinner, J., & Weinberg, S. (2001). What accounts for the variation in retirement wealth among U.S. households? American Economic Review, 91, 832–857.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bernheim, D., & Rangel, A. (2007). Public economics: Welfare and policy analysis with non-standard decision-makers. In P. Diamon & H. Vartiaine (Eds.), Behavioral economics and its applications (pp. 7–77). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bernhei, D., Ray, D., & Yeltekin, S. (2012). Poverty and self-control. New York: Mimeo.Google Scholar
  9. Bucciol, A. (2011). A note on social security welfare with self-control problems. Macroeconomic Dynamics, 15, 579–594.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bucciol, A. (2012). Measuring self-control problems: A structural estimation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 2, 668–675.Google Scholar
  11. Cremer, H., de Donder, P., Maldonado, D., & Pestieau, P. (2008). Designing a linear pension scheme with forced savings and wage heterogeneity. International Tax and Public Finance, 15(5), 547–562.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cremer, H., & Pestieau, P. (2011). Myopia, redistribution and pensions. European Economic Review, 55, 165–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fehr, H., Habermann, C., & Kindermann, F. (2008). Social security with rational and hyperbolic consumers. Review of Economic Dynamics, 11(4), 884–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’Donoghue, T. (2002). Time-discounting and time-preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, XL, 351–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gul, F., & Pesendorfer, W. (2001). Temptation and self-control. Econometrica, 69(6), 1403–1435.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gul, F., & Pesendorfer, W. (2004). Self-control and the theory of consumption. Econometrica, 72(1), 119–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Haliassos, M. & Reiter, M. (2005). Credit card debt puzzles. Economics Working Papers 901, Department of Economics and Business, Universitat Pompeu Fabra.Google Scholar
  18. Huang, K., Liu, Z., & Zhu, Q. (2013). Temptation and self-control: Some evidence and applications. New York: Mimeo.Google Scholar
  19. Imrohoroglu, A., Imrohoroglu, S., & Joines, D. H. (2003). Time-inconsistent preferences and social security. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(2), 745–784.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirby, K., & Herrenstein, R. (1995). Preference reversals due to myopic discounting of delayed reward. Psychological Science, 6, 83–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Krussel, P., Kuruscu, B., & Simth, A, Jr. (2010). Temptation and taxation. Econometrica, 78, 2063–2084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumru, C. S., & Thanopoulos, A. (2008). Social security and self-control preferences. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 32, 757–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumru, C. S., & Thanopoulos, A. (2011). Social security reform and self-control preferences. Journal of Public Economics, 95, 886–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Laibson, D. (1997). Golden eggs and hyperbolic discounting. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 443–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Laibson, D., Repetto, A., & Tobacman, J. (2003). A debt puzzle. In S. Phelps (Ed.), In knowledge, information, and expectations in modern economics (pp. 228–266). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  26. Lindbeck, A., & Persson, M. (2003). The gains from pension reform. Journal of Economic Literature, 41, 74–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Loewenstein, G. (1996). Out of control: Visceral influences on behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 65, 272–292.Google Scholar
  28. Mani, A., Mulainathan, S., Shafir, E., & Zhao, J. (2013). Poverty impedes cognitive function. Science, 341, 976–980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Mullainathan, S. & Banerjee, A. (2010). The shape of temptation: Implications for the economic lives of the poor. NBER Working Papers.Google Scholar
  30. Phelps, E. S., & Pollak, R. (1968). On second-best national saving and game-equilibrium growth. Review of Economic Studies, 35, 185–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Samuelson, P. (1937). A note on measurement of utility. Review of Economic Studies, 4, 155–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shah, A., Mulainatha, S., & Shafir, E. (2012). Some consequences of having too little. Science, 338, 682–685.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Spears, D. (2011). Economic decision-making in poverty depletes behavioral control. B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis and Policy, 11, 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Strotz, R. H. (1955). Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utlity maximization. Review of Economic Studies, 23, 165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wertenbroch, K. (1998). Consumption self-control by rationing purchase quantities of virtue and vice. Marketing Science, 17, 317–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Pier-André Bouchard St-Amant
    • 1
  • Jean-Denis Garon
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for New Economic ThinkingNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Département des sciences économiquesUniversité du Québec à Montréal and CESIfo.MontréalCanada

Personalised recommendations