International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 375–396 | Cite as

Federal coordination of local housing demolition in the presence of filtering and migration

  • Kristof Dascher


Vacant housing and even housing demolition have recently become an issue in a number of countries. Given this renewed interest in demolition, this paper contributes to the literature on (i) housing demolition and (ii) policy coordination. The paper extends Sweeney’s (Econometrica 42:147–167, 1974a) analysis of demolition and filtering, by letting households also choose their location. Then when demolishing part of its housing stock, a city effectively evicts some of its residents not just out of the housing quality it demolishes but out of every other of its qualities, too. The paper shows that demolition’s coordination strengthens local governments’ incentive to demolish part of their stock, by shutting down inter city migration within qualities.—A case study on Germany’s East illustrates the effects of coordinated, simultaneous every-city demolition.


Housing demolition Policy coordination Regional migration Filtering 

JEL Classification

H73 D61 R21 



I am very grateful for the comments I received from an anonymous referee, the editor (John Wilson), Lutz Arnold, Frank Barry, Alexander Haupt, Aron Kiss, Sven Knoth and Gabe Lee. I am also very grateful for stimulating discussion with participants of: the DFG workshop on “Fiscal Federalism and Tax Competition”, a seminar at the Halle Institute of Economic Research, the Regensburg workshop on Real Estate Economics and Finance, and seminar presentations at Paderborn University, Technical University Dresden, and at Helmut-Schmidt University Hamburg. Finally, access to Mikrozensus data at the Federal Statistical Office Berlin (FDZ) is gratefully acknowledged. Any remaining errors are mine.


  1. Arnott, R., Davidson, R., & Pines, D. (1986). Spatial aspects of housing quality, density and maintenance. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 190–217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnott, R., Braid, R., Davidson, R., & Pines, D. (1999). A general equilibrium spatial model of housing quality and quantity. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 29, 283–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. (BMVBS) Federal Ministry for Traffic, Construction and Urban Planning (2006). Statusbericht. Stadtumbau Ost. Stand und Perspektive. Google Scholar
  4. Braid, R. (1981). The short-run comparative statics of a rental housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 10, 286–310. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Braid, R. (1984). The effects of government housing policies in a vintage filtering model. Journal of Urban Economics, 16, 272–296. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cooper, R., & John, A. (1988). Coordinating coordination failures in Keynesian models. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 103(3), 441–463. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dascher, K. (2012). Home voters, house prices, and the political economy of zoning and demolition. Working paper. Google Scholar
  8. (FAZ) Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (2006). Erste Anzeichen für eine Besserung auf den Wohnungsmärkten, No. 149, June 30: 61. Google Scholar
  9. Glaeser, E., & Gyourko, J. (2008). The case against housing price supports. Economists’ Voice. Google Scholar
  10. Graybill, F. (1983). Matrices with applications in statistics (2nd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth. Google Scholar
  11. Irish Independent (2011). Nama boss says foreign banks may bulldoze ghost sizes, June 24th 2011. Google Scholar
  12. Ito, T. (2007). Effects of quality changes in rental housing markets with indivisibilities. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 602–617. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kaneko, M., Ito, T., & Osawa, Y. (2006). Duality in comparative statics in rental housing markets with indivisibilities. Journal of Urban Economics, 59, 142–170. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Oates, W. (2011). Fiscal federalism. Cheltenham Glos: Elgar. Google Scholar
  15. Ohls, J. (1975). Public policy toward low-income housing and filtering in housing markets. Journal of Urban Economics, 2, 144–171. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Simon, C., & Blume, L. (1994). Mathematics for economists. New York: Norton. Google Scholar
  17. Sweeney, J. (1974a). Quality, commodity hierarchies and housing markets. Econometrica, 42, 147–167. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sweeney, J. (1974b). A commodity hierarchy model of the rental housing market. Journal of Urban Economics, 1, 288–323. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Takayama, A. (1985). Mathematical economics (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
  20. Topkis, D. (1998). Supermodularity and complementarity. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  21. Wooldridge, J. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (2nd ed.). Cambridge: MIT Press. Google Scholar
  22. Zabel, J., & Dalton, M. (2011). The effect of minimum lot size regulations on house prices in Eastern Massachusetts. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41, 571–583. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zodrow, G., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation and the under-provision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356–370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ManagementTouro College BerlinBerlinGermany

Personalised recommendations