International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 19, Issue 3, pp 393–423 | Cite as

Empirical evidence on the effects of tax incentives

  • Alexander Klemm
  • Stefan Van Parys


This paper considers two empirical questions about tax incentives: (i) are incentives used as tools of tax competition and (ii) how effective are incentives in attracting investment? To answer these, we prepared a new dataset of tax incentives in over 40 Latin American, Caribbean and African countries for the period 1985–2004. Using spatial econometrics techniques for panel data to answer the first question, we find evidence for strategic interaction in tax holidays, in addition to the well-known competition over the corporate income tax (CIT) rate. We find no robust evidence, however, for competition over investment allowances and tax credits. Using dynamic panel data econometrics to answer the second question, we find evidence that lower CIT rates and longer tax holidays are effective in attracting FDI in Latin America and the Caribbean but not in Africa. None of the tax incentives is effective in boosting gross private fixed capital formation.


Tax incentives Tax competition Investment Developing countries 

JEL Classification

H25 H87 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. Altshuler, R., & Goodspeed, T. J. (2002). Follow the leader? Evidence on European and US tax competition. Rutgers University Department of Economics Working Papers, 200226. Google Scholar
  2. Anselin, L. (1988). Spatial econometrics: methods and models. Hingham: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
  3. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. R. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variables estimation of error components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 29–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Asiedu, E. (2002). On the determinants of foreign direct investment to developing countries: is Africa different. World Development, 30(1), 107–119. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asiedu, E. (2006). Foreign direct investment in Africa: the role of natural resources, market size, government policy, institutions and political instability. The World Economy, 29(1), 63–77. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Azemar, C., & Delios, A. (2008). Tax competition and FDI: the special case of developing countries. Journal of Japanese International Economics, 22, 85–105. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Azemar, C., Desbordes, R., & Mucchielli, J.-L. (2007). Do tax sparing agreements contribute to the attraction of FDI in developing countries? International Tax and Public Finance, 14, 543–562. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baldwin, R., & Krugman, P. (2004). Agglomeration, integration and tax harmonization. European Economic Review, 48, 1–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Besley, T., & Case, A. (1995). Incumbent behavior: vote-seeking, tax-setting, and Yardstick competition. American Economic Review, 85, 25–45. Google Scholar
  11. Bird, R. M. (2000). Tax incentives for investment in developing countries. In G. Perry, J. Whalley, & G. McMahon (Eds.), Fiscal reform and structural change in developing countries (Vol. 1, pp. 201–221). New York: McMillan. Google Scholar
  12. Blonigen, B. A., Davies, R., Waddell, G. R., & Naughton, H. (2007). FDI in space: spatial autoregressive relationships in foreign direct investment. European Economic Review, 51(5), 1303–1325. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blonigen, B. A., & Wang, M. (2004). Inappropriate pooling of wealthy and poor countries in empirical FDI studies. NBER working paper, 10378. Google Scholar
  14. Bloom, N., Griffith, R., & Van Reenen, J. (2002). Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries, 1979–1997. Journal of Public Economics, 85, 1–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Blundell, R., & Bond, S. (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 11–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bolnick, B. (2009). Investing in Mozambique: the role of fiscal incentives. Nathan Associates Inc., Arlington. Produced for USAID under the Mozambique Trade and Investment Project.
  17. Bondonio, D., & Greenbaum, R. T. (2007). Do local tax incentives affect economic growth? What mean impacts miss in the analysis of enterprise zone policies. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 37, 121–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brueckner, J. K. (2003). Strategic interaction among governments: an overview of empirical studies. International Regional Science Review, 26, 175–188. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bucovetsky, S. (1991). Asymmetric tax competition. Journal of Urban Economics, 30, 167–181. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Crabbé, K., & Vandenbussche, H. (2009). Are your firm’s taxes set in Warsaw? Spatial tax competition in Europe. CEPR discussion papers 7159. Google Scholar
  21. Davies, R. B., & Voget, J. (2010). Tax competition in an expanding European Union. GEE papers 0033. Google Scholar
  22. De Mooij, R. A., & Ederveen, S. (2003). Taxation and foreign direct investment: a synthesis of empirical research. International Tax and Public Finance, 10(6), 673–693. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Devereux, M. P., Griffith, R., & Klemm, A. (2002). Corporate income tax reforms and international tax competition. Economic Policy, 17(35), 451–495. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Devereux, M. P., Griffith, R., & Simpson, H. (2007). Firm location decisions, regional grants and agglomeration externalities. Journal of Public Economics, 91, 413–435. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Devereux, M., Lockwood, B., & Redoano, M. (2008). Do countries compete over corporate tax rates. Journal of Public Economics, 92, 1210–1235. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dreher, A. (2006). The influence of globalization on taxes and social policy: an empirical analysis for OECD countries. European Journal of Political Economy, 22, 179–201. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Elhorst, J. P. (2010). Spatial panel data models. In M. M. Fischer & A. Getis (Eds.), Handbook of applied spatial analysis (pp. 377–407). Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foucault, M., Madies, T., & Paty, S. (2008). Public spending interactions and local politics. Empirical evidence from French municipalities. Public Choice, 137, 57–80. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Harris, M. N., Matyas, L., & Sevestre, P. (2008). Dynamic models for short panels. In L. Matyas (Ed.), The econometrics of panel data: fundamentals and recent developments in theory and practice (pp. 249–278). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  30. Hasset, K. A., & Hubbard, R. G. (2002). Tax policy and business investment. In A. Auerbach & M. Feldstein (Eds.), Handbook of public economics (Vol. 3). Amsterdam: Elsevier. Google Scholar
  31. Hines, J. R. (1999). Lessons from behavioral responses to international taxation. National Tax Journal, 52(2), 305–322. Google Scholar
  32. Jorgenson, D. W. (1963). Capital theory and investment behavior. American Economic Review, 53, 247–259. Google Scholar
  33. Judson, R. A., & Owen, A. L. (1999). Estimating dynamic panel data models: a practical guide for macroeconomists. Economics Letters, 1, 9–15. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Keen, M., & Mansour, M. (2009). Revenue mobilization in Sub-Saharan Africa: challenges from globalization. IMF working paper, WP/09/157. Google Scholar
  35. Kelejian, H. H., & Prucha, I. R. (1998). A generalized spatial two-stage least squares procedure for estimating a spatial autoregressive model with autoregressive disturbances. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 17, 99–121. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelejian, H. H., & Prucha, I. R. (2004). Estimation of simultaneous systems of spatially interrelated cross sectional equations. Journal of Econometrics, 118, 27–50. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Klemm, A. (2010). Causes, benefits and risks of tax incentives. International Tax and Public Finance, 17(3), 315–336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kukenova, M. (2008). Spatial dynamic panel model and system GMM: a Monte Carlo investigation. MPRA paper, No. 11569, November. Google Scholar
  39. Lee, L., & Yu, J. (2010). Some recent developments in spatial panel data models. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40, 255–271. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Levine, R., & Renelt, D. (1992). A sensitivity analysis of cross country growth regressions. American Economic Review, 82(4), 942–963. Google Scholar
  41. Madariaga, N., & Poncet, S. (2007). FDI in Chinese cities: spillovers and impact on growth. The World Economy, 30, 837–862. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mankwin, N. G., Phelps, E. S., & Romer, P. M. (1995). The growth of nations. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1995(1), 275–326. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mintz, J. M. (1995). Tax holidays and investment. In A. Shah (Ed.), Fiscal incentives for investment and innovation (pp. 165–194). New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  44. Mutti, J., & Grubert, H. (2004). Empirical asymmetries in foreign direct investment and taxation. Journal of International Economics, 62, 337–358. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nguyen, T. C., Hoang, T. P., Cung, T. V., Freeman, N. J., & Ray, D. (2004). An empirical study of corporate income tax investment incentives for domestic companies in Vietnam. Vietnam National University. USAID.
  46. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica, 49(6), 1417–1426. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. OECD (2001). Corporate tax incentives for foreign direct investment. OECD Tax Policy Study, No. 4. Google Scholar
  48. Overesch, M., & Rinke, J. (2009). What drives corporate tax rates down? A reassessment of globalization, tax competition, and dynamic adjustment to shocks. CESifo working paper, No. 2535. Google Scholar
  49. Price Waterhouse/PriceWaterhouseCoopers, various years. World corporate tax guide. Google Scholar
  50. Redoano, M. (2007). Fiscal interactions among European countries. Does the EU matter? CESIFO working paper, No. 1952, March. Google Scholar
  51. Shah, A. (1995). Fiscal incentives for investment and innovation. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
  52. Sinn, H.-W. (2003). The new systems competition. Oxford: Blackwell. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Swenson, D. L. (1994). The impact of US tax reform on foreign direct investment in the United States. Journal of Public Economics, 54, 243–266. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Squalli, J., & Wilson, K. (2006). A new approach to measuring trade openness. EPRU working paper, 06-07. Google Scholar
  55. Van Parys, S., & James, S. (2009). Why tax incentives may be an ineffective tool to encouraging investment? The role of the investment climate. Mimeo World Bank, December 2009. Google Scholar
  56. Van Parys, S., & James, S. (2010). The effectiveness of tax incentives in attracting investment: panel data evidence from the CFA franc zone. International Tax and Public Finance, 17(4), 400–429. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson, J. D. (1999). Theories of tax competition. National Tax Journal, 52(2), 269–304. Google Scholar
  58. Wells, L. T., & Allen, N. (2001). Tax holidays to attract foreign direct investment: lessons from two experiments. In L. T. Wells, N. J. Allen, J. Morisset, & N. Prinia (Eds.), Using tax incentives to compete for foreign investment—are they worth the costs? Foreign Investment Advisory Service, Occasional Paper 15. Google Scholar
  59. Zee, H. H., Stotsky, J. G., & Ley, E. (2002). Tax incentives for business investment: a primer for policy makers in developing countries. World Development, 30(9), 1497–1516. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zodrow, G. R., & Mieszkowski, P. (1986). Pigou, Tiebout, property taxation and the underprovision of local public goods. Journal of Urban Economics, 19, 356–370. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculteit Economie en BedrijfskundeGhent UniversityGentBelgium
  2. 2.European Central BankFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations