Advertisement

International Tax and Public Finance

, Volume 14, Issue 5, pp 563–582 | Cite as

Taxpayers' responsiveness to tax rate changes and implications for the cost of taxation in Sweden

  • Åsa Hansson
Article

Abstract

Historically, labor supply elasticities have been used to evaluate tax policy and predict tax revenue effects. They are likely to underestimate taxpayers' response to tax rate changes, and hence to underestimate changes in potential tax revenues, however, because they measure only how taxpayers alter hours worked. Taxpayers can also respond to tax rate changes by altering, for instance, their work effort and form of compensation. An alternative measure that accounts for these responses as well as hours worked is the elasticity of taxable income. This paper estimates the elasticity of earned taxable income for Swedish taxpayers using two different approaches and a number of control variables and the 1990/1991 tax reform as a “natural experiment”. The preferred elasticity estimates fall in the range of 0.4–0.5, comparable with recent estimates for the U.S. and larger than most of the labor supply elasticity estimates used to evaluate tax policy in Scandinavia previously, which suggests that deadweight losses are two to three times higher than previously thought.

Keywords

Tax reform Elasticity of taxable income Deadweight loss 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aarbu, K. O., & Thoresen, T. O. (2001). Income responses to tax changes—evidence from the norwegian tax reform. National Tax Journal, 54(2), 319–335.Google Scholar
  2. Agell, J., Englund, P., & Södersten, J. (1995). Svensk skattepolitik i teori och praktik: 1991 års skatterefom (Swedish tax policy in theory and practice; the 1991 tax reform). Supplement to SOU 1995:104.Google Scholar
  3. Aronsson, T., & Palme, M. (1998). A decade of tax and benefit reforms in Sweden: Effects on labor supply, welfare and inequality. Economica, 65, 39–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ashenfelter, O. C., & Layard, R. (1986). Handbook of labor economics, vol. 1. North Holland: Amsterdam.Google Scholar
  5. Auerbach, A. J., & Slemrod, J. (1997). The economic effects of the tax reform act of 1986. Journal of Economic Literature, 35(2), 589–632.Google Scholar
  6. Auten, G., & Carroll, R. (1999). The effect of income taxes on household income. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81(4), 681–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ballard, C. L., Shoven, J. B., & Whalley, J. (1985). General equilibrium computations of the marginal welfare cost of taxes in the United States. American Economic Review, 75, 128–138.Google Scholar
  8. Blomquist, N. S., & Hansson-Brusewitz, U. (1990). The effects of taxes on male and female labor supply in Sweden. Journal of Human Resources, 25(3), 317–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browning, E. K. (1987). On the marginal welfare cost of taxation. American Economic Review, 77, 11–23.Google Scholar
  10. Carroll, R. (1998). Do taxpayers really respond to changes in tax rates? Evidence from the1993 tax act. Office of Tax Analysis Working Paper No. 78, Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Treasury.Google Scholar
  11. Feldstein, M. (1995). The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: A panel study of the 1986 tax reform act. Journal of Political Economy, 103, 551–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Feldstein, M. (1999). Tax avoidance and the deadweight loss of the income tax. Review of Economics and Statistics, 81, 674–680.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Goolsbee, A. (1998). It’s not about the money: why natural experiments don’t work on the rich. NBER Working Paper No. 6395, NBER.Google Scholar
  14. Gruber, J. & Saez, E. S. (2002). The elasticity of taxable income: Evidence and implications. Journal of Public Economics, 84, 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gustafsson, B., & Palmer, E. (2002). Was the burden of the deep Swedish recession equally shared? Review of Income and Wealth, 48(4), 537–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hansson, I. (1984), Marginal cost of public funds for different tax instruments and government expenditures. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 86(2), 115–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hansson, I., & Stuart, C. (1985). Tax revenue and the marginal cost of public funds in Sweden. Journal of Public Economics, 27, 331–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hansson, Å. (2004). Taxpayers responsiveness to tax rate changes and the implication for the cost of taxation. Scandinavian Working Papers in Economics 2004:5, Lund University.Google Scholar
  19. Harberger, A. C. (1964). Taxation, resource allocation, and welfare. In John Due (Ed.), The role of direct and indirect taxes in the federal tax system. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Lindsey, L. (1987). Individual taxpayer response to tax cuts: 1982–1984. Journal of Public Economics, 33, 173–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Moffitt, R. A., & Wilhelm, M. (1998). Taxation and labour supply decisions of the affluent. NBER Working Paper No. 6621, NBER.Google Scholar
  22. Parry, I. W. H. (2002). Tax deductions and the marginal welfare cost of taxation. International Tax and Public Finance, 9, 531–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. RSV (2003). Tax statistical yearbook of Sweden.Google Scholar
  24. Saez, E. S. (2004). Reported incomes and marginal tax rates, 1960–2000: Evidence and policy implications. NBER Working Paper No. 10273.Google Scholar
  25. SCB (2003). Statistical yearbook of Sweden. SCB, Statistiska Central Byrån (Statistical Sweden), 2003, LINDA, http://www.scb.se/statistik/le1900/le1900%5Fmer.asp
  26. Selèn, J. (2002). Taxable income responses to tax chenges—a panel analysis of 1990/91 Swedish reform. FIEF Working Paper No. 177.Google Scholar
  27. Sillamaa, M.-A., & Veall, M. R. (2000). The effect of marginal tax rates on taxable income: A panel of the 1988 tax flattening in Canada. QSEP Research Report No. 354.Google Scholar
  28. Slemrod, J. (1998), Methodological issues in measuring and interpreting taxable income elasticities. National Tax Journal, 51, 773–788.Google Scholar
  29. Slemrod, J., & Kopczuk, W. (2002). The optimal elasticity of taxable income. Journal of Public Economics, 84, 91–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Stuart, C. (1984). Welfare costs per dollar of additional tax revenue in the United States. American Economic Review, 74, 352–362.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsLund UniversityLundSweden

Personalised recommendations